Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de

The goal of this study was to investigate the retrieval effectiveness of three popular German Web search services. For this purpose the engines Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de were compared with each other in terms of the precision of their top 20 results. The test panelists were based on a col...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joachim Griesbaum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Borås 2004-01-01
Series:Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper189.html
id doaj-ae581957bef545728ecc3af840e095a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae581957bef545728ecc3af840e095a42020-11-24T20:53:07ZengUniversity of BoråsInformation Research: An International Electronic Journal1368-16132004-01-0194189Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.deJoachim GriesbaumThe goal of this study was to investigate the retrieval effectiveness of three popular German Web search services. For this purpose the engines Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de were compared with each other in terms of the precision of their top 20 results. The test panelists were based on a collection of 50 randomly selected queries, and relevance assessments were made by independent jurors. Relevance assessments were acquired separately a) for the search results themselves and b) for the result descriptions on the search engine results pages. The basic findings were: 1.) Google reached the best result values. Statistical validation showed that Google performed significantly better than Altavista, but there was no significant difference between Google and Lycos. Lycos also attained better values than Altavista, but again the differences reached no significant value. In terms of top 20 precision, the experiment showed similar outcomes to the preceding retrieval test in 2002. Google, followed by Lycos and then Altavista, still performs best, but the gaps between the engines are closer now. 2.) There are big deviations between the relevance assignments based on the judgement of the results themselves and those based on the judgements of the result descriptions on the search engine results pages.http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper189.htmlEvaluationretrieval testsearch engines
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joachim Griesbaum
spellingShingle Joachim Griesbaum
Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
Evaluation
retrieval test
search engines
author_facet Joachim Griesbaum
author_sort Joachim Griesbaum
title Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
title_short Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
title_full Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
title_fullStr Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of three German search engines: Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de
title_sort evaluation of three german search engines: altavista.de, google.de and lycos.de
publisher University of Borås
series Information Research: An International Electronic Journal
issn 1368-1613
publishDate 2004-01-01
description The goal of this study was to investigate the retrieval effectiveness of three popular German Web search services. For this purpose the engines Altavista.de, Google.de and Lycos.de were compared with each other in terms of the precision of their top 20 results. The test panelists were based on a collection of 50 randomly selected queries, and relevance assessments were made by independent jurors. Relevance assessments were acquired separately a) for the search results themselves and b) for the result descriptions on the search engine results pages. The basic findings were: 1.) Google reached the best result values. Statistical validation showed that Google performed significantly better than Altavista, but there was no significant difference between Google and Lycos. Lycos also attained better values than Altavista, but again the differences reached no significant value. In terms of top 20 precision, the experiment showed similar outcomes to the preceding retrieval test in 2002. Google, followed by Lycos and then Altavista, still performs best, but the gaps between the engines are closer now. 2.) There are big deviations between the relevance assignments based on the judgement of the results themselves and those based on the judgements of the result descriptions on the search engine results pages.
topic Evaluation
retrieval test
search engines
url http://informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper189.html
work_keys_str_mv AT joachimgriesbaum evaluationofthreegermansearchenginesaltavistadegoogledeandlycosde
_version_ 1716797990061998080