Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts

Background<br /> Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) provider...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naomi Fulop, Estela Capelas Barbosa, Melissa Hill, Jean Ledger, Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson, Jonathan Spencer, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Steve Morris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2020-04-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3696_0ac4f9eeebcfc816f2ad6748c1b9ebc7.pdf
id doaj-ae79a350e28f4bf3bcedec7a5ce60df9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ae79a350e28f4bf3bcedec7a5ce60df92020-11-25T03:07:14ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392020-04-019414315110.15171/ijhpm.2019.1003696Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS TrustsNaomi Fulop0Estela Capelas Barbosa1Melissa Hill2Jean Ledger3Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson4Jonathan Spencer5Cecilia Vindrola-Padros6Steve Morris7Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UKDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UKDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UKDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UKResearch Team, The Nuffield Trust, London, UKResearch Team, The Nuffield Trust, London, UKDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UKDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKBackground<br /> Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk of going into SMQ that receive support. There is limited knowledge about whether the interventions used to deliver this support drive improvements in quality, their costs, and whether they strike the right balance between support and scrutiny. The study will seek to determine how provider organisations respond to these interventions, and whether and how these interventions impact organisations’ capacity to achieve and sustain quality improvements over time.<br />  <br /> Methods<br /> This is a multi-site, mixed methods study. We will carry out interviews at national level to understand the programme theory underpinning the interventions. We will conduct 8 NHS case studies to explore the impact and implementation of the interventions that form part of the SMQ and challenged providers programme. We will use a conceptual framework based on models of organisational readiness for change and draw on board maturity research for implementing quality improvement. We will also review the use of quantitative metrics and data for tracking the progress of improvements in quality of care and sustainability upon leaving SMQ, as well as the costs and benefits of the interventions through a cost-consequence analysis (CCA).<br />  <br /> Discussion<br /> High-quality interventions that successfully support struggling healthcare organisations are essential and an issue that is an international concern. Our study will allow a greater understanding of the programme theory, impact, and staff views and experiences of the SMQ and challenged providers regime. Formative feedback will be reported to key stakeholders.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3696_0ac4f9eeebcfc816f2ad6748c1b9ebc7.pdforganisational failurespecial measures for qualitynational health service (nhs)mixed methods research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naomi Fulop
Estela Capelas Barbosa
Melissa Hill
Jean Ledger
Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson
Jonathan Spencer
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
Steve Morris
spellingShingle Naomi Fulop
Estela Capelas Barbosa
Melissa Hill
Jean Ledger
Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson
Jonathan Spencer
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
Steve Morris
Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
organisational failure
special measures for quality
national health service (nhs)
mixed methods research
author_facet Naomi Fulop
Estela Capelas Barbosa
Melissa Hill
Jean Ledger
Christopher Sherlaw-Johnson
Jonathan Spencer
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
Steve Morris
author_sort Naomi Fulop
title Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_short Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_full Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_fullStr Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_full_unstemmed Special Measures for Quality and Challenged Providers: Study Protocol for Evaluating the Impact of Improvement Interventions in NHS Trusts
title_sort special measures for quality and challenged providers: study protocol for evaluating the impact of improvement interventions in nhs trusts
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
issn 2322-5939
2322-5939
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Background<br /> Healthcare organisations in England rated as inadequate in terms of leadership and one other domain enter the Special Measures for Quality (SMQ) regime to receive increased support and oversight. There is also a ‘watch list’ of challenged National Health Service (NHS) providers at risk of going into SMQ that receive support. There is limited knowledge about whether the interventions used to deliver this support drive improvements in quality, their costs, and whether they strike the right balance between support and scrutiny. The study will seek to determine how provider organisations respond to these interventions, and whether and how these interventions impact organisations’ capacity to achieve and sustain quality improvements over time.<br />  <br /> Methods<br /> This is a multi-site, mixed methods study. We will carry out interviews at national level to understand the programme theory underpinning the interventions. We will conduct 8 NHS case studies to explore the impact and implementation of the interventions that form part of the SMQ and challenged providers programme. We will use a conceptual framework based on models of organisational readiness for change and draw on board maturity research for implementing quality improvement. We will also review the use of quantitative metrics and data for tracking the progress of improvements in quality of care and sustainability upon leaving SMQ, as well as the costs and benefits of the interventions through a cost-consequence analysis (CCA).<br />  <br /> Discussion<br /> High-quality interventions that successfully support struggling healthcare organisations are essential and an issue that is an international concern. Our study will allow a greater understanding of the programme theory, impact, and staff views and experiences of the SMQ and challenged providers regime. Formative feedback will be reported to key stakeholders.
topic organisational failure
special measures for quality
national health service (nhs)
mixed methods research
url https://www.ijhpm.com/article_3696_0ac4f9eeebcfc816f2ad6748c1b9ebc7.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT naomifulop specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT estelacapelasbarbosa specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT melissahill specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT jeanledger specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT christophersherlawjohnson specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT jonathanspencer specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT ceciliavindrolapadros specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
AT stevemorris specialmeasuresforqualityandchallengedprovidersstudyprotocolforevaluatingtheimpactofimprovementinterventionsinnhstrusts
_version_ 1724671735505092608