Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites

This study evaluates the performances of the new version (v.5.1) of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (FEM) in simulating gross primary productivity (GPP), against eddy covariance GPP data for 10 FLUXNET forest sites across Europe. A new carbon allocation module, coupled with new both phenological and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Collalti, S. Marconi, A. Ibrom, C. Trotta, A. Anav, E. D'Andrea, G. Matteucci, L. Montagnani, B. Gielen, I. Mammarella, T. Grünwald, A. Knohl, F. Berninger, Y. Zhao, R. Valentini, M. Santini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-02-01
Series:Geoscientific Model Development
Online Access:http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/479/2016/gmd-9-479-2016.pdf
id doaj-aeb29846f39748c2bb5e87a41e5c1c74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aeb29846f39748c2bb5e87a41e5c1c742020-11-25T00:10:45ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032016-02-019247950410.5194/gmd-9-479-2016Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sitesA. Collalti0S. Marconi1A. Ibrom2C. Trotta3A. Anav4E. D'Andrea5G. Matteucci6L. Montagnani7B. Gielen8I. Mammarella9T. Grünwald10A. Knohl11F. Berninger12Y. Zhao13R. Valentini14M. Santini15Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change – Division on Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), 01100 Viterbo, ItalyEuro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change – Division on Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), 01100 Viterbo, ItalyCentre for Ecosystems and Environmental Sustainability, Dept. Chem. Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Roskilde, DenmarkUniversity of Tuscia – Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), 01100 Viterbo, ItalyCollege of Engineering, Mathematics, and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UKCNR-IBAF – National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Agroenvironmental and Forest Biology, 00015 Monterotondo Scalo, RM, ItalyCNR-IBAF – National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Agroenvironmental and Forest Biology, 00015 Monterotondo Scalo, RM, ItalyForest Services, Autonomous Province of Bolzano, 39100, Bolzano, Italy; and Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, ItalyResearch Group of Plant and Vegetation Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, BelgiumUniversity of Helsinki – Department of Physics, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandTechnische Universität (TU) Dresden, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Chair of Meteorology, 01062 Dresden, GermanyBioclimatology, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Büsgenweg 2, 37077 Göttingen, GermanyDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, POBox 27, 00014, HelsinkiLOCEAN/IPSL, UMR 7159, Sorbonne Universitès, Unitè mixte UPMC-CNRS-IRD-MNHN, 4 place Jussieu, 75005, Paris, FranceEuro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change – Division on Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), 01100 Viterbo, ItalyEuro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change – Division on Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), 01100 Viterbo, ItalyThis study evaluates the performances of the new version (v.5.1) of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (FEM) in simulating gross primary productivity (GPP), against eddy covariance GPP data for 10 FLUXNET forest sites across Europe. A new carbon allocation module, coupled with new both phenological and autotrophic respiration schemes, was implemented in this new daily version. Model ability in reproducing timing and magnitude of daily and monthly GPP fluctuations is validated at intra-annual and inter-annual scale, including extreme anomalous seasons. With the purpose to test the 3D-CMCC FEM applicability over Europe without a site-related calibration, the model has been deliberately parametrized with a single set of species-specific parametrizations for each forest ecosystem. The model consistently reproduces both in timing and in magnitude daily and monthly GPP variability across all sites, with the exception of the two Mediterranean sites. We find that 3D-CMCC FEM tends to better simulate the timing of inter-annual anomalies than their magnitude within measurements' uncertainty. In six of eight sites where data are available, the model well reproduces the 2003 summer drought event. Finally, for three sites we evaluate whether a more accurate representation of forest structural characteristics (i.e. cohorts, forest layers) and species composition can improve model results. In two of the three sites results reveal that model slightly increases its performances although, statistically speaking, not in a relevant way.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/479/2016/gmd-9-479-2016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Collalti
S. Marconi
A. Ibrom
C. Trotta
A. Anav
E. D'Andrea
G. Matteucci
L. Montagnani
B. Gielen
I. Mammarella
T. Grünwald
A. Knohl
F. Berninger
Y. Zhao
R. Valentini
M. Santini
spellingShingle A. Collalti
S. Marconi
A. Ibrom
C. Trotta
A. Anav
E. D'Andrea
G. Matteucci
L. Montagnani
B. Gielen
I. Mammarella
T. Grünwald
A. Knohl
F. Berninger
Y. Zhao
R. Valentini
M. Santini
Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
Geoscientific Model Development
author_facet A. Collalti
S. Marconi
A. Ibrom
C. Trotta
A. Anav
E. D'Andrea
G. Matteucci
L. Montagnani
B. Gielen
I. Mammarella
T. Grünwald
A. Knohl
F. Berninger
Y. Zhao
R. Valentini
M. Santini
author_sort A. Collalti
title Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
title_short Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
title_full Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
title_fullStr Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
title_full_unstemmed Validation of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 European forest sites
title_sort validation of 3d-cmcc forest ecosystem model (v.5.1) against eddy covariance data for 10 european forest sites
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geoscientific Model Development
issn 1991-959X
1991-9603
publishDate 2016-02-01
description This study evaluates the performances of the new version (v.5.1) of 3D-CMCC Forest Ecosystem Model (FEM) in simulating gross primary productivity (GPP), against eddy covariance GPP data for 10 FLUXNET forest sites across Europe. A new carbon allocation module, coupled with new both phenological and autotrophic respiration schemes, was implemented in this new daily version. Model ability in reproducing timing and magnitude of daily and monthly GPP fluctuations is validated at intra-annual and inter-annual scale, including extreme anomalous seasons. With the purpose to test the 3D-CMCC FEM applicability over Europe without a site-related calibration, the model has been deliberately parametrized with a single set of species-specific parametrizations for each forest ecosystem. The model consistently reproduces both in timing and in magnitude daily and monthly GPP variability across all sites, with the exception of the two Mediterranean sites. We find that 3D-CMCC FEM tends to better simulate the timing of inter-annual anomalies than their magnitude within measurements' uncertainty. In six of eight sites where data are available, the model well reproduces the 2003 summer drought event. Finally, for three sites we evaluate whether a more accurate representation of forest structural characteristics (i.e. cohorts, forest layers) and species composition can improve model results. In two of the three sites results reveal that model slightly increases its performances although, statistically speaking, not in a relevant way.
url http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/9/479/2016/gmd-9-479-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT acollalti validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT smarconi validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT aibrom validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT ctrotta validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT aanav validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT edandrea validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT gmatteucci validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT lmontagnani validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT bgielen validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT imammarella validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT tgrunwald validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT aknohl validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT fberninger validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT yzhao validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT rvalentini validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
AT msantini validationof3dcmccforestecosystemmodelv51againsteddycovariancedatafor10europeanforestsites
_version_ 1725407304473378816