Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital

Background and Aims: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunanda Gupta, Udita Naithani, C Madhanmohan, Ajay Singh, Pradeep Reddy, Apoorva Gupta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Gupta
id doaj-aee3de061ff24c42a6e91084074dc9f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aee3de061ff24c42a6e91084074dc9f02020-11-24T21:38:08ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology0970-91852017-01-01331647010.4103/0970-9185.202197Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospitalSunanda GuptaUdita NaithaniC MadhanmohanAjay SinghPradeep ReddyApoorva GuptaBackground and Aims: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30 min, and a delay of more than75 min in the presence of maternal or fetal compromise can lead to poor outcome. This prospective 1-year study was conducted on emergency CS in a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the DDI, factors affecting it and to analyze their effects on maternal and neonatal outcome. Material and Methods: A structured proforma was used to analyze the data from all women undergoing emergency CS, during a 1-year period, included in Category 1 and 2 of NICE guidelines for CS. Results: A total of 453 emergency CSs were evaluated, with a mean DDI of 36.3 ± 17.2 min for Category 1 CS and 38.1 ± 17.7 min for Category 2 CS (P > 0.05). Only 42.4% emergency CSs confirmed to the 30 min DDI while 57.6% had a DDI of more than 30 min. Reasons of delay were identified as a delay in shifting the patient to operation theater (22.1%), anesthesia factors (18.1%), and lack of resources or manpower (16.1%). Maternal complications occurred in 15 (3.3%) patients with 3 (0.7%) nonsurvivors having a DDI of 91.0 ± 97.0 min as compared to survivors with a DDI of 36.8 ± 15.7 min, P = 0.001. There was no significant association between DDI and occurrence of neonatal complications. Conclusion: Failure to meet the current recommendations was associated with adverse maternal outcomes, but not with adverse neonatal outcome.http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=GuptaDecision-to-delivery intervaldecision-to-delivery intervalemergency cesarean sectionmaternal outcomeneonatal outcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sunanda Gupta
Udita Naithani
C Madhanmohan
Ajay Singh
Pradeep Reddy
Apoorva Gupta
spellingShingle Sunanda Gupta
Udita Naithani
C Madhanmohan
Ajay Singh
Pradeep Reddy
Apoorva Gupta
Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
Decision-to-delivery interval
decision-to-delivery interval
emergency cesarean section
maternal outcome
neonatal outcome
author_facet Sunanda Gupta
Udita Naithani
C Madhanmohan
Ajay Singh
Pradeep Reddy
Apoorva Gupta
author_sort Sunanda Gupta
title Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
title_short Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
title_full Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
title_fullStr Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
title_sort evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: a 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology
issn 0970-9185
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background and Aims: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30 min, and a delay of more than75 min in the presence of maternal or fetal compromise can lead to poor outcome. This prospective 1-year study was conducted on emergency CS in a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the DDI, factors affecting it and to analyze their effects on maternal and neonatal outcome. Material and Methods: A structured proforma was used to analyze the data from all women undergoing emergency CS, during a 1-year period, included in Category 1 and 2 of NICE guidelines for CS. Results: A total of 453 emergency CSs were evaluated, with a mean DDI of 36.3 ± 17.2 min for Category 1 CS and 38.1 ± 17.7 min for Category 2 CS (P > 0.05). Only 42.4% emergency CSs confirmed to the 30 min DDI while 57.6% had a DDI of more than 30 min. Reasons of delay were identified as a delay in shifting the patient to operation theater (22.1%), anesthesia factors (18.1%), and lack of resources or manpower (16.1%). Maternal complications occurred in 15 (3.3%) patients with 3 (0.7%) nonsurvivors having a DDI of 91.0 ± 97.0 min as compared to survivors with a DDI of 36.8 ± 15.7 min, P = 0.001. There was no significant association between DDI and occurrence of neonatal complications. Conclusion: Failure to meet the current recommendations was associated with adverse maternal outcomes, but not with adverse neonatal outcome.
topic Decision-to-delivery interval
decision-to-delivery interval
emergency cesarean section
maternal outcome
neonatal outcome
url http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2017;volume=33;issue=1;spage=64;epage=70;aulast=Gupta
work_keys_str_mv AT sunandagupta evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital
AT uditanaithani evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital
AT cmadhanmohan evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital
AT ajaysingh evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital
AT pradeepreddy evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital
AT apoorvagupta evaluationofdecisiontodeliveryintervalinemergencycesareansectiona1yearprospectiveauditinatertiarycarehospital
_version_ 1725935429535924224