Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives

Narrative data analysis aims to understand the stories’ content, structure, or function. However narrative data can also be used to examine how context influences self-concepts, relationship dynamics, and meaning-making. This methodological paper explores the potential of narrative analysis to disco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denise Saint Arnault, Laura Sinko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-08-01
Series:Global Qualitative Nursing Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211020722
id doaj-af2020b86b264610af225911740fbe5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-af2020b86b264610af225911740fbe5b2021-08-17T21:33:23ZengSAGE PublishingGlobal Qualitative Nursing Research2333-39362021-08-01810.1177/23333936211020722Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in NarrativesDenise Saint Arnault0Laura Sinko1University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor MI, USATemple University, Philadelphia, PA, USANarrative data analysis aims to understand the stories’ content, structure, or function. However narrative data can also be used to examine how context influences self-concepts, relationship dynamics, and meaning-making. This methodological paper explores the potential of narrative analysis to discover and compare the processes by which culture shapes selfhood and meaning making. We describe the development of the Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method as an analytic procedure to systematically compare narrators’ experiences, meaning making, decisions, and actions across cultures. This analytic strategy seeks to discover shared themes, examine culturally distinct themes, and illuminate meta-level cultural beliefs and values that link shared themes. We emphasize the need for a shared research question, comparable samples, shared non-biased instruments, and high-fidelity training if one uses this qualitative method for cross-cultural research. Finally, specific issues, trouble-shooting practices, and implications are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211020722
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Denise Saint Arnault
Laura Sinko
spellingShingle Denise Saint Arnault
Laura Sinko
Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives
Global Qualitative Nursing Research
author_facet Denise Saint Arnault
Laura Sinko
author_sort Denise Saint Arnault
title Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives
title_short Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives
title_full Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives
title_fullStr Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method: Comparing Culture in Narratives
title_sort comparative ethnographic narrative analysis method: comparing culture in narratives
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Global Qualitative Nursing Research
issn 2333-3936
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Narrative data analysis aims to understand the stories’ content, structure, or function. However narrative data can also be used to examine how context influences self-concepts, relationship dynamics, and meaning-making. This methodological paper explores the potential of narrative analysis to discover and compare the processes by which culture shapes selfhood and meaning making. We describe the development of the Comparative Ethnographic Narrative Analysis Method as an analytic procedure to systematically compare narrators’ experiences, meaning making, decisions, and actions across cultures. This analytic strategy seeks to discover shared themes, examine culturally distinct themes, and illuminate meta-level cultural beliefs and values that link shared themes. We emphasize the need for a shared research question, comparable samples, shared non-biased instruments, and high-fidelity training if one uses this qualitative method for cross-cultural research. Finally, specific issues, trouble-shooting practices, and implications are discussed.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211020722
work_keys_str_mv AT denisesaintarnault comparativeethnographicnarrativeanalysismethodcomparingcultureinnarratives
AT laurasinko comparativeethnographicnarrativeanalysismethodcomparingcultureinnarratives
_version_ 1721204119142662144