Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery

Introduction: It is believed that the outcomes of robotic surgery depends not only on the experience of the console surgeon but also the patient-side assistant. However, objective data supporting it is lacking. The aim of this study was to objectively determine change in operative outcomes with incr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rishi Nayyar, Siddharth Yadav, Prabhjot Singh, Prem Nath Dogra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2016;volume=32;issue=3;spage=204;epage=209;aulast=Nayyar
id doaj-af7458f6642b47aea2eddd045423e346
record_format Article
spelling doaj-af7458f6642b47aea2eddd045423e3462020-11-25T01:25:41ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242016-01-0132320420910.4103/0970-1591.185095Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgeryRishi NayyarSiddharth YadavPrabhjot SinghPrem Nath DograIntroduction: It is believed that the outcomes of robotic surgery depends not only on the experience of the console surgeon but also the patient-side assistant. However, objective data supporting it is lacking. The aim of this study was to objectively determine change in operative outcomes with increasing experience of patient-side assistant. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 222 urologic robotic procedures performed by two teams of surgeon-assistant and split the data into two chronological halves according to date of surgery. We considered that the assistant was inexperienced in the 1st half and had become experienced by the 2nd half, and we compared mean operative time and blood loss between these two halves of his experience. Results: We observed that with increasing experience of the assistant, the mean operative time reduced from 138.06 to 124.32 min (P = 0.001) and mean blood loss decreased from 191.93 to 187.61 ml (P = 0.57). On subset analysis, a consistent trend of reduction in the mean operative time was noted for both the assistants separately and for all surgical procedures included in the analysis. Maximum reduction was noted for pyeloplasty which was the most commonly performed surgery. The mean blood loss had a varied relation to the experience of the assistant and did not reach statistical significance in either direction. Conclusions: With increasing experience of the patient-side surgeon, the mean operative time for all robotic procedures showed a consistent trend of reduction across all types of surgery with greater reduction for commonly performed procedures.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2016;volume=32;issue=3;spage=204;epage=209;aulast=NayyarOutcomes of robotic surgeryrobotic surgeryscrubbed surgeonsurgical robot
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rishi Nayyar
Siddharth Yadav
Prabhjot Singh
Prem Nath Dogra
spellingShingle Rishi Nayyar
Siddharth Yadav
Prabhjot Singh
Prem Nath Dogra
Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
Indian Journal of Urology
Outcomes of robotic surgery
robotic surgery
scrubbed surgeon
surgical robot
author_facet Rishi Nayyar
Siddharth Yadav
Prabhjot Singh
Prem Nath Dogra
author_sort Rishi Nayyar
title Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
title_short Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
title_full Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
title_fullStr Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
title_sort impact of assistant surgeon on outcomes in robotic surgery
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Introduction: It is believed that the outcomes of robotic surgery depends not only on the experience of the console surgeon but also the patient-side assistant. However, objective data supporting it is lacking. The aim of this study was to objectively determine change in operative outcomes with increasing experience of patient-side assistant. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 222 urologic robotic procedures performed by two teams of surgeon-assistant and split the data into two chronological halves according to date of surgery. We considered that the assistant was inexperienced in the 1st half and had become experienced by the 2nd half, and we compared mean operative time and blood loss between these two halves of his experience. Results: We observed that with increasing experience of the assistant, the mean operative time reduced from 138.06 to 124.32 min (P = 0.001) and mean blood loss decreased from 191.93 to 187.61 ml (P = 0.57). On subset analysis, a consistent trend of reduction in the mean operative time was noted for both the assistants separately and for all surgical procedures included in the analysis. Maximum reduction was noted for pyeloplasty which was the most commonly performed surgery. The mean blood loss had a varied relation to the experience of the assistant and did not reach statistical significance in either direction. Conclusions: With increasing experience of the patient-side surgeon, the mean operative time for all robotic procedures showed a consistent trend of reduction across all types of surgery with greater reduction for commonly performed procedures.
topic Outcomes of robotic surgery
robotic surgery
scrubbed surgeon
surgical robot
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2016;volume=32;issue=3;spage=204;epage=209;aulast=Nayyar
work_keys_str_mv AT rishinayyar impactofassistantsurgeononoutcomesinroboticsurgery
AT siddharthyadav impactofassistantsurgeononoutcomesinroboticsurgery
AT prabhjotsingh impactofassistantsurgeononoutcomesinroboticsurgery
AT premnathdogra impactofassistantsurgeononoutcomesinroboticsurgery
_version_ 1725112437237088256