Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory

The objective of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14) using a Rasch model approach in a cross-sectional design. The scale was administered to N = 130 British patients with different psychosomatic conditions. The scale failed to show clear...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siobhan Lynch, Niko Kohls, Martin Offenbächer, Sebastian Sauer, Harald Walach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2011-12-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/2/4/693/
id doaj-afc1a07cc945447db75cebe09755a1d8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afc1a07cc945447db75cebe09755a1d82020-11-25T00:21:06ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442011-12-012469370610.3390/rel2040693Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness InventorySiobhan LynchNiko KohlsMartin OffenbächerSebastian SauerHarald WalachThe objective of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14) using a Rasch model approach in a cross-sectional design. The scale was administered to N = 130 British patients with different psychosomatic conditions. The scale failed to show clear one-factoriality and item 13 did not fit the Rasch model. A two-factorial solution without item 13, however, appeared to fit well. The scale seemed to work equally well in different subgroups such as patients with or without mindfulness practice. However, some limitations of the validity of both the one-factorial and the two-factorial version of the scale were observed. Sizeable floor and ceiling effects limit the diagnostical use of the instrument. In summary, the study demonstrates that the two-factorial version of the FMI-13 shows acceptable approximation to Rasch requirements, but is in need of further improvement. The one-factorial solution did not fit well, and cannot be recommended for further use.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/2/4/693/mindfulnessmeasurementassessmentRaschitem response theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siobhan Lynch
Niko Kohls
Martin Offenbächer
Sebastian Sauer
Harald Walach
spellingShingle Siobhan Lynch
Niko Kohls
Martin Offenbächer
Sebastian Sauer
Harald Walach
Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
Religions
mindfulness
measurement
assessment
Rasch
item response theory
author_facet Siobhan Lynch
Niko Kohls
Martin Offenbächer
Sebastian Sauer
Harald Walach
author_sort Siobhan Lynch
title Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
title_short Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
title_full Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
title_fullStr Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Mindfulness: A Rasch Analysis of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory
title_sort measuring mindfulness: a rasch analysis of the freiburg mindfulness inventory
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2011-12-01
description The objective of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI-14) using a Rasch model approach in a cross-sectional design. The scale was administered to N = 130 British patients with different psychosomatic conditions. The scale failed to show clear one-factoriality and item 13 did not fit the Rasch model. A two-factorial solution without item 13, however, appeared to fit well. The scale seemed to work equally well in different subgroups such as patients with or without mindfulness practice. However, some limitations of the validity of both the one-factorial and the two-factorial version of the scale were observed. Sizeable floor and ceiling effects limit the diagnostical use of the instrument. In summary, the study demonstrates that the two-factorial version of the FMI-13 shows acceptable approximation to Rasch requirements, but is in need of further improvement. The one-factorial solution did not fit well, and cannot be recommended for further use.
topic mindfulness
measurement
assessment
Rasch
item response theory
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/2/4/693/
work_keys_str_mv AT siobhanlynch measuringmindfulnessaraschanalysisofthefreiburgmindfulnessinventory
AT nikokohls measuringmindfulnessaraschanalysisofthefreiburgmindfulnessinventory
AT martinoffenbacher measuringmindfulnessaraschanalysisofthefreiburgmindfulnessinventory
AT sebastiansauer measuringmindfulnessaraschanalysisofthefreiburgmindfulnessinventory
AT haraldwalach measuringmindfulnessaraschanalysisofthefreiburgmindfulnessinventory
_version_ 1725363908729896960