Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments

Recent data suggest that the parietal operculum acts as an integration center within a multimodal network, originating from different primary sensory and motor cortices and projecting to frontal, parietal and temporal cortical hubs, which in turn govern cognitive and motor functions. Thus, parietal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvia M. Marchese, Roberto Esposti, Francesco Bolzoni, Paolo Cavallari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01159/full
id doaj-afdad20146f5477283fa5477dc8c8114
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afdad20146f5477283fa5477dc8c81142020-11-24T22:01:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2019-09-011010.3389/fphys.2019.01159481071Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural AdjustmentsSilvia M. MarcheseRoberto EspostiFrancesco BolzoniPaolo CavallariRecent data suggest that the parietal operculum acts as an integration center within a multimodal network, originating from different primary sensory and motor cortices and projecting to frontal, parietal and temporal cortical hubs, which in turn govern cognitive and motor functions. Thus, parietal operculum might also play a crucial role in the integrated control of voluntary movement and posture. As a first step to test this hypothesis, the Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APAs) stabilizing the arm when the index-finger is briskly flexed were recorded, on the preferred side, in three groups of 10 healthy subjects, before, during and after CATHODAL or ANODAL transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS, 20 min at 2 mA) applied over the contralateral Parietal Operculum (coPO). Results were compared to those obtained in a SHAM group. In agreement with literature, in the SHAM group the activation of the prime mover Flexor Digitorum Superficialis was preceded by an inhibitory APA in Biceps Brachii and Anterior Deltoid, and almost simultaneous to an excitatory APA in Triceps Brachii. The same pattern was observed in both the CATHODAL and ANODAL groups, with no significant tDCS effects on APAs amplitude and timing. Index-finger kinematics were also unchanged. These negative results suggest that the coPO does not disturb the key network governing APAs in index-finger flexion. Since it has been well documented that such APAs share many features with those observed in trunk and limb muscles when performing several other movements, we suggest that coPO may not be crucial to the general APA control.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01159/fulltDCSparietal operculumintra-limb APAsintegration of voluntary movement and posturehuman
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Silvia M. Marchese
Roberto Esposti
Francesco Bolzoni
Paolo Cavallari
spellingShingle Silvia M. Marchese
Roberto Esposti
Francesco Bolzoni
Paolo Cavallari
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
Frontiers in Physiology
tDCS
parietal operculum
intra-limb APAs
integration of voluntary movement and posture
human
author_facet Silvia M. Marchese
Roberto Esposti
Francesco Bolzoni
Paolo Cavallari
author_sort Silvia M. Marchese
title Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
title_short Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
title_full Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
title_fullStr Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parietal Operculum Contralateral to the Moving Limb Does Not Affect the Programming of Intra-Limb Anticipatory Postural Adjustments
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation on parietal operculum contralateral to the moving limb does not affect the programming of intra-limb anticipatory postural adjustments
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Physiology
issn 1664-042X
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Recent data suggest that the parietal operculum acts as an integration center within a multimodal network, originating from different primary sensory and motor cortices and projecting to frontal, parietal and temporal cortical hubs, which in turn govern cognitive and motor functions. Thus, parietal operculum might also play a crucial role in the integrated control of voluntary movement and posture. As a first step to test this hypothesis, the Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APAs) stabilizing the arm when the index-finger is briskly flexed were recorded, on the preferred side, in three groups of 10 healthy subjects, before, during and after CATHODAL or ANODAL transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS, 20 min at 2 mA) applied over the contralateral Parietal Operculum (coPO). Results were compared to those obtained in a SHAM group. In agreement with literature, in the SHAM group the activation of the prime mover Flexor Digitorum Superficialis was preceded by an inhibitory APA in Biceps Brachii and Anterior Deltoid, and almost simultaneous to an excitatory APA in Triceps Brachii. The same pattern was observed in both the CATHODAL and ANODAL groups, with no significant tDCS effects on APAs amplitude and timing. Index-finger kinematics were also unchanged. These negative results suggest that the coPO does not disturb the key network governing APAs in index-finger flexion. Since it has been well documented that such APAs share many features with those observed in trunk and limb muscles when performing several other movements, we suggest that coPO may not be crucial to the general APA control.
topic tDCS
parietal operculum
intra-limb APAs
integration of voluntary movement and posture
human
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01159/full
work_keys_str_mv AT silviammarchese transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparietaloperculumcontralateraltothemovinglimbdoesnotaffecttheprogrammingofintralimbanticipatoryposturaladjustments
AT robertoesposti transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparietaloperculumcontralateraltothemovinglimbdoesnotaffecttheprogrammingofintralimbanticipatoryposturaladjustments
AT francescobolzoni transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparietaloperculumcontralateraltothemovinglimbdoesnotaffecttheprogrammingofintralimbanticipatoryposturaladjustments
AT paolocavallari transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparietaloperculumcontralateraltothemovinglimbdoesnotaffecttheprogrammingofintralimbanticipatoryposturaladjustments
_version_ 1725842153773465600