Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups

The current study investigated the inter-rater reliability and the construct validity of the Rorschach Lerner Defense Scale (LDS). In particular, it aimed to explore the inter-rater reliability, analyzing the most frequent coding mistakes in an attempt to improve the coding guidelines, and to invest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Maria Rosso, Cinzia Airaldi, Andrea Camoirano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708886/full
id doaj-afdcf5d7986d41679c686372b10490ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-afdcf5d7986d41679c686372b10490ea2021-09-24T05:15:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-09-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.708886708886Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical GroupsAnna Maria Rosso0Anna Maria Rosso1Cinzia Airaldi2Andrea Camoirano3Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyAssociazione Psicologia Clinica, Genova, ItalyDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, ItalyAssociazione Psicologia Clinica, Genova, ItalyThe current study investigated the inter-rater reliability and the construct validity of the Rorschach Lerner Defense Scale (LDS). In particular, it aimed to explore the inter-rater reliability, analyzing the most frequent coding mistakes in an attempt to improve the coding guidelines, and to investigate the ability of the scale to distinguish between individuals with neurotic-level and borderline-level personality organization, according to the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual-2 (PDM-2), and non-clinical subjects. Eighty clinical subjects and 80 non-clinical ones participated in the study. Among the clinical subjects, 40 have borderline-level personality organization and 40 have neurotic-level personality organization. Non-clinical subjects were drawn from an archival dataset of non-clinical individuals who previously participated in a Rorschach normative study. The LDS showed substantial inter-rater reliability; however, guidelines could be improved, specifically with regard to the threshold for coding Devaluation and Idealization at level 1. Furthermore, more examples should be included in the manual about the coding of Projective Identification and Denial. The LDS distinguished borderline-level subjects from both the non-clinical and neurotic groups with regard to Devaluation and Projective Identification, with borderline-level personality organization subjects reporting higher scores than either of the two other groups. Only the Denial scale discriminated between the non-clinical and neurotic group, with the latter reporting higher scores of high-level Denial.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708886/fulldefense mechanismsLerner Defense ScaleRorschach testPsychodynamic Diagnostic Manual-second editionlevel of personality organization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Maria Rosso
Anna Maria Rosso
Cinzia Airaldi
Andrea Camoirano
spellingShingle Anna Maria Rosso
Anna Maria Rosso
Cinzia Airaldi
Andrea Camoirano
Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups
Frontiers in Psychology
defense mechanisms
Lerner Defense Scale
Rorschach test
Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual-second edition
level of personality organization
author_facet Anna Maria Rosso
Anna Maria Rosso
Cinzia Airaldi
Andrea Camoirano
author_sort Anna Maria Rosso
title Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups
title_short Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups
title_full Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups
title_fullStr Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups
title_full_unstemmed Inter-rater Reliability and Construct Validity of the Lerner Defense Scale in Clinical and Non-clinical Groups
title_sort inter-rater reliability and construct validity of the lerner defense scale in clinical and non-clinical groups
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The current study investigated the inter-rater reliability and the construct validity of the Rorschach Lerner Defense Scale (LDS). In particular, it aimed to explore the inter-rater reliability, analyzing the most frequent coding mistakes in an attempt to improve the coding guidelines, and to investigate the ability of the scale to distinguish between individuals with neurotic-level and borderline-level personality organization, according to the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual-2 (PDM-2), and non-clinical subjects. Eighty clinical subjects and 80 non-clinical ones participated in the study. Among the clinical subjects, 40 have borderline-level personality organization and 40 have neurotic-level personality organization. Non-clinical subjects were drawn from an archival dataset of non-clinical individuals who previously participated in a Rorschach normative study. The LDS showed substantial inter-rater reliability; however, guidelines could be improved, specifically with regard to the threshold for coding Devaluation and Idealization at level 1. Furthermore, more examples should be included in the manual about the coding of Projective Identification and Denial. The LDS distinguished borderline-level subjects from both the non-clinical and neurotic groups with regard to Devaluation and Projective Identification, with borderline-level personality organization subjects reporting higher scores than either of the two other groups. Only the Denial scale discriminated between the non-clinical and neurotic group, with the latter reporting higher scores of high-level Denial.
topic defense mechanisms
Lerner Defense Scale
Rorschach test
Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual-second edition
level of personality organization
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708886/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annamariarosso interraterreliabilityandconstructvalidityofthelernerdefensescaleinclinicalandnonclinicalgroups
AT annamariarosso interraterreliabilityandconstructvalidityofthelernerdefensescaleinclinicalandnonclinicalgroups
AT cinziaairaldi interraterreliabilityandconstructvalidityofthelernerdefensescaleinclinicalandnonclinicalgroups
AT andreacamoirano interraterreliabilityandconstructvalidityofthelernerdefensescaleinclinicalandnonclinicalgroups
_version_ 1717370132890648576