Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016

Abstract Major advances have been made in the treatment of cancer with targeted therapy and immunotherapy; several FDA-approved agents with associated improvement of 1-year survival rates became available for stage IV melanoma patients. Before 2010, the 1-year survival were quite low, at 30%; in 201...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paolo A. Ascierto, Sanjiv S. Agarwala, Gennaro Ciliberto, Sandra Demaria, Reinhard Dummer, Connie P. M. Duong, Soldano Ferrone, Silvia C. Formenti, Claus Garbe, Ruth Halaban, Samir Khleif, Jason J. Luke, Lluis M. Mir, Willem W. Overwijk, Michael Postow, Igor Puzanov, Paul Sondel, Janis M. Taube, Per Thor Straten, David F. Stroncek, Jennifer A. Wargo, Hassane Zarour, Magdalena Thurin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:Journal of Translational Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1341-2
id doaj-aff33776974e42f8b672304e627ad57e
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paolo A. Ascierto
Sanjiv S. Agarwala
Gennaro Ciliberto
Sandra Demaria
Reinhard Dummer
Connie P. M. Duong
Soldano Ferrone
Silvia C. Formenti
Claus Garbe
Ruth Halaban
Samir Khleif
Jason J. Luke
Lluis M. Mir
Willem W. Overwijk
Michael Postow
Igor Puzanov
Paul Sondel
Janis M. Taube
Per Thor Straten
David F. Stroncek
Jennifer A. Wargo
Hassane Zarour
Magdalena Thurin
spellingShingle Paolo A. Ascierto
Sanjiv S. Agarwala
Gennaro Ciliberto
Sandra Demaria
Reinhard Dummer
Connie P. M. Duong
Soldano Ferrone
Silvia C. Formenti
Claus Garbe
Ruth Halaban
Samir Khleif
Jason J. Luke
Lluis M. Mir
Willem W. Overwijk
Michael Postow
Igor Puzanov
Paul Sondel
Janis M. Taube
Per Thor Straten
David F. Stroncek
Jennifer A. Wargo
Hassane Zarour
Magdalena Thurin
Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
Journal of Translational Medicine
Melanoma
Immunotherapy
Cancer
Checkpoint blockade updates
Combination therapies
Biomarkers
author_facet Paolo A. Ascierto
Sanjiv S. Agarwala
Gennaro Ciliberto
Sandra Demaria
Reinhard Dummer
Connie P. M. Duong
Soldano Ferrone
Silvia C. Formenti
Claus Garbe
Ruth Halaban
Samir Khleif
Jason J. Luke
Lluis M. Mir
Willem W. Overwijk
Michael Postow
Igor Puzanov
Paul Sondel
Janis M. Taube
Per Thor Straten
David F. Stroncek
Jennifer A. Wargo
Hassane Zarour
Magdalena Thurin
author_sort Paolo A. Ascierto
title Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
title_short Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
title_full Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
title_fullStr Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
title_full_unstemmed Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016
title_sort future perspectives in melanoma research “melanoma bridge”, napoli, november 30th–3rd december 2016
publisher BMC
series Journal of Translational Medicine
issn 1479-5876
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract Major advances have been made in the treatment of cancer with targeted therapy and immunotherapy; several FDA-approved agents with associated improvement of 1-year survival rates became available for stage IV melanoma patients. Before 2010, the 1-year survival were quite low, at 30%; in 2011, the rise to nearly 50% in the setting of treatment with Ipilimumab, and rise to 70% with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in 2013 was observed. Even more impressive are 1-year survival rates considering combination strategies with both targeted therapy and immunotherapy, now exceeding 80%. Can we improve response rates even further, and bring these therapies to more patients? In fact, despite these advances, responses are heterogeneous and are not always durable. There is a critical need to better understand who will benefit from therapy, as well as proper timing, sequence and combination of different therapeutic agents. How can we better understand responses to therapy and optimize treatment regimens? The key to better understanding therapy and to optimizing responses is with insights gained from responses to targeted therapy and immunotherapy through translational research in human samples. Combination therapies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, electrochemotherapy with immunotherapy agents such as Immune Checkpoint Blockers are under investigation but there is much room for improvement. Adoptive T cell therapy including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Understanding the mechanisms behind the development of acquired resistance and tests for biomarkers for treatment decisions are also under study and will offer new opportunities for more efficient combination therapies. Knowledge of immunologic features of the tumor microenvironment associated with response and resistance will improve the identification of patients who will derive the most benefit from monotherapy and might reveal additional immunologic determinants that could be targeted in combination with checkpoint blockade. The future of advanced melanoma needs to involve education and trials, biobanks with a focus on primary tumors, bioinformatics and empowerment of patients and clinicians.
topic Melanoma
Immunotherapy
Cancer
Checkpoint blockade updates
Combination therapies
Biomarkers
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1341-2
work_keys_str_mv AT paoloaascierto futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT sanjivsagarwala futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT gennarociliberto futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT sandrademaria futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT reinharddummer futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT conniepmduong futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT soldanoferrone futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT silviacformenti futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT clausgarbe futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT ruthhalaban futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT samirkhleif futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT jasonjluke futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT lluismmir futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT willemwoverwijk futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT michaelpostow futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT igorpuzanov futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT paulsondel futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT janismtaube futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT perthorstraten futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT davidfstroncek futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT jenniferawargo futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT hassanezarour futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
AT magdalenathurin futureperspectivesinmelanomaresearchmelanomabridgenapolinovember30th3rddecember2016
_version_ 1725902574175911936
spelling doaj-aff33776974e42f8b672304e627ad57e2020-11-24T21:46:01ZengBMCJournal of Translational Medicine1479-58762017-11-0115113110.1186/s12967-017-1341-2Future perspectives in melanoma research “Melanoma Bridge”, Napoli, November 30th–3rd December 2016Paolo A. Ascierto0Sanjiv S. Agarwala1Gennaro Ciliberto2Sandra Demaria3Reinhard Dummer4Connie P. M. Duong5Soldano Ferrone6Silvia C. Formenti7Claus Garbe8Ruth Halaban9Samir Khleif10Jason J. Luke11Lluis M. Mir12Willem W. Overwijk13Michael Postow14Igor Puzanov15Paul Sondel16Janis M. Taube17Per Thor Straten18David F. Stroncek19Jennifer A. Wargo20Hassane Zarour21Magdalena Thurin22Unit of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale”Oncology & Hematology, St. Luke’s University Hospital and Temple UniversityIRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer InstituteRadiation Oncology and Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeDepartment of Dermatology, University of Zurich HospitalINSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Institut Gustave RoussyMassachusetts General HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical CollegeDivision of Dermatologic Oncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls UniversityDepartment of Dermatology, Yale University School of MedicineGeorgia Cancer Center, Augusta UniversityDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer CenterCNRS (National Center for Scientific Research, France), University Paris-Saclay, Gustave RoussyDivision of Cancer Medicine, Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology-Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer InstitutePediatrics, Human Oncology and Genetics, University of WisconsinJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineCenter for Cancer Immune Therapy (CCIT), Department of Hematology, University Hospital HerlevClinical Center, National Institutes of HealthDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterMedicine, Immunology and Dermatology Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of MedicineCancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, NIHAbstract Major advances have been made in the treatment of cancer with targeted therapy and immunotherapy; several FDA-approved agents with associated improvement of 1-year survival rates became available for stage IV melanoma patients. Before 2010, the 1-year survival were quite low, at 30%; in 2011, the rise to nearly 50% in the setting of treatment with Ipilimumab, and rise to 70% with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy in 2013 was observed. Even more impressive are 1-year survival rates considering combination strategies with both targeted therapy and immunotherapy, now exceeding 80%. Can we improve response rates even further, and bring these therapies to more patients? In fact, despite these advances, responses are heterogeneous and are not always durable. There is a critical need to better understand who will benefit from therapy, as well as proper timing, sequence and combination of different therapeutic agents. How can we better understand responses to therapy and optimize treatment regimens? The key to better understanding therapy and to optimizing responses is with insights gained from responses to targeted therapy and immunotherapy through translational research in human samples. Combination therapies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, electrochemotherapy with immunotherapy agents such as Immune Checkpoint Blockers are under investigation but there is much room for improvement. Adoptive T cell therapy including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes therapy is also efficacious in metastatic melanoma and outcome enhancement seem likely by improved homing capacity of chemokine receptor transduced T cells. Understanding the mechanisms behind the development of acquired resistance and tests for biomarkers for treatment decisions are also under study and will offer new opportunities for more efficient combination therapies. Knowledge of immunologic features of the tumor microenvironment associated with response and resistance will improve the identification of patients who will derive the most benefit from monotherapy and might reveal additional immunologic determinants that could be targeted in combination with checkpoint blockade. The future of advanced melanoma needs to involve education and trials, biobanks with a focus on primary tumors, bioinformatics and empowerment of patients and clinicians.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12967-017-1341-2MelanomaImmunotherapyCancerCheckpoint blockade updatesCombination therapiesBiomarkers