LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES

This article analyses the content of the Ruling of the Constitutional Court21/2010 regarding the statutory institutions of the Council of StatutoryGuarantees and the Ombudsman’s Offi ce, and in particular the sectiondeclared unconstitutional: section 4 of article 76 and the fi rst section ofarticle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joaquín Tornos Mas
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern 2011-03-01
Series:Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Tornos_tcm112-146945.pdf
id doaj-b0052e5179cc4c8fb5266d4b777ef5aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0052e5179cc4c8fb5266d4b777ef5aa2021-03-02T08:15:06ZcatInstitut d'Estudis de l'AutogovernRevista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals1886-26322011-03-0112192210LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGESJoaquín Tornos MasThis article analyses the content of the Ruling of the Constitutional Court21/2010 regarding the statutory institutions of the Council of StatutoryGuarantees and the Ombudsman’s Offi ce, and in particular the sectiondeclared unconstitutional: section 4 of article 76 and the fi rst section ofarticle 78. With regard to the unconstitutionality of section 4 of article 76the positions of the appellant and the defenders of the statutory contentare presented and there is a criticism of the arguments for the Ruling andfi nally the declaration of unconstitutionality in that section. It does notshare the criteria of the Court in which the ruling of the Council in the caseof autonomous laws that violate statutory rights may affect the law of participationof MPs in making the laws or the exclusive powers of the ConstitutionalCourt in controlling them. With respect to the rule relating to theOmbudsman’s Offi ce the positions of the opposing sides are also examinedand the criteria of the Ruling is shared on understanding that article 54 ofthe EC does not allows the Ombudsman to intervene in the guarantee ofbasic rights by violating those rights in Catalonia.http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Tornos_tcm112-146945.pdfstatutory institutionsCouncil of Statutory Guaranteesstatutory rightsOmbudsman’s Offi ceOmbudsman
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joaquín Tornos Mas
spellingShingle Joaquín Tornos Mas
LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES
Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
statutory institutions
Council of Statutory Guarantees
statutory rights
Ombudsman’s Offi ce
Ombudsman
author_facet Joaquín Tornos Mas
author_sort Joaquín Tornos Mas
title LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES
title_short LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES
title_full LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES
title_fullStr LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES
title_full_unstemmed LES INSTITUCIONS DE LA GENERALITAT DAVANT EL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL. LA SENTÈNCIA 31/2010, EL CONSELL DE GARANTIES ESTATUTÀRIES I EL SÍNDIC DE GREUGES
title_sort les institucions de la generalitat davant el tribunal constitucional. la sentència 31/2010, el consell de garanties estatutàries i el síndic de greuges
publisher Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern
series Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
issn 1886-2632
publishDate 2011-03-01
description This article analyses the content of the Ruling of the Constitutional Court21/2010 regarding the statutory institutions of the Council of StatutoryGuarantees and the Ombudsman’s Offi ce, and in particular the sectiondeclared unconstitutional: section 4 of article 76 and the fi rst section ofarticle 78. With regard to the unconstitutionality of section 4 of article 76the positions of the appellant and the defenders of the statutory contentare presented and there is a criticism of the arguments for the Ruling andfi nally the declaration of unconstitutionality in that section. It does notshare the criteria of the Court in which the ruling of the Council in the caseof autonomous laws that violate statutory rights may affect the law of participationof MPs in making the laws or the exclusive powers of the ConstitutionalCourt in controlling them. With respect to the rule relating to theOmbudsman’s Offi ce the positions of the opposing sides are also examinedand the criteria of the Ruling is shared on understanding that article 54 ofthe EC does not allows the Ombudsman to intervene in the guarantee ofbasic rights by violating those rights in Catalonia.
topic statutory institutions
Council of Statutory Guarantees
statutory rights
Ombudsman’s Offi ce
Ombudsman
url http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Tornos_tcm112-146945.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT joaquintornosmas lesinstitucionsdelageneralitatdavanteltribunalconstitucionallasentencia312010elconselldegarantiesestatutariesielsindicdegreuges
_version_ 1724240769532821504