Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adul...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Viruses |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/4/653 |
id |
doaj-b081f79e86f24d47b8f810f982abd794 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b081f79e86f24d47b8f810f982abd7942021-04-10T23:00:17ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-04-011365365310.3390/v13040653Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2Florian Hitzenbichler0Stilla Bauernfeind1Bernd Salzberger2Barbara Schmidt3Jürgen J. Wenzel4Department of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanySevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed by RT-qPCR with absolute quantification. The median concentrations and diagnostic sensitivities were <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> copies/mL, 85% (NS), <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 79% (OS) and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 85% (TW). Concentration differences were significant between NS and TW (<i>P</i> = 0.019). Saliva (SA) was available from 21 patients (median <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). OS and TW can be considered for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, although with slightly lower concentrations.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/4/653SARS-CoV-2COVID-19throat washingnasopharyngeal swaboropharyngeal swabsaliva |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Florian Hitzenbichler Stilla Bauernfeind Bernd Salzberger Barbara Schmidt Jürgen J. Wenzel |
spellingShingle |
Florian Hitzenbichler Stilla Bauernfeind Bernd Salzberger Barbara Schmidt Jürgen J. Wenzel Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Viruses SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 throat washing nasopharyngeal swab oropharyngeal swab saliva |
author_facet |
Florian Hitzenbichler Stilla Bauernfeind Bernd Salzberger Barbara Schmidt Jürgen J. Wenzel |
author_sort |
Florian Hitzenbichler |
title |
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short |
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full |
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort |
comparison of throat washings, nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs for detection of sars-cov-2 |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Viruses |
issn |
1999-4915 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed by RT-qPCR with absolute quantification. The median concentrations and diagnostic sensitivities were <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> copies/mL, 85% (NS), <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 79% (OS) and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 85% (TW). Concentration differences were significant between NS and TW (<i>P</i> = 0.019). Saliva (SA) was available from 21 patients (median <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). OS and TW can be considered for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, although with slightly lower concentrations. |
topic |
SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 throat washing nasopharyngeal swab oropharyngeal swab saliva |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/4/653 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT florianhitzenbichler comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2 AT stillabauernfeind comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2 AT berndsalzberger comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2 AT barbaraschmidt comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2 AT jurgenjwenzel comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2 |
_version_ |
1721531750680625152 |