Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Florian Hitzenbichler, Stilla Bauernfeind, Bernd Salzberger, Barbara Schmidt, Jürgen J. Wenzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Viruses
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/4/653
id doaj-b081f79e86f24d47b8f810f982abd794
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b081f79e86f24d47b8f810f982abd7942021-04-10T23:00:17ZengMDPI AGViruses1999-49152021-04-011365365310.3390/v13040653Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2Florian Hitzenbichler0Stilla Bauernfeind1Bernd Salzberger2Barbara Schmidt3Jürgen J. Wenzel4Department of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyDepartment of Infection Prevention and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, GermanySevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed by RT-qPCR with absolute quantification. The median concentrations and diagnostic sensitivities were <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> copies/mL, 85% (NS), <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 79% (OS) and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 85% (TW). Concentration differences were significant between NS and TW (<i>P</i> = 0.019). Saliva (SA) was available from 21 patients (median <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). OS and TW can be considered for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, although with slightly lower concentrations.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/4/653SARS-CoV-2COVID-19throat washingnasopharyngeal swaboropharyngeal swabsaliva
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Florian Hitzenbichler
Stilla Bauernfeind
Bernd Salzberger
Barbara Schmidt
Jürgen J. Wenzel
spellingShingle Florian Hitzenbichler
Stilla Bauernfeind
Bernd Salzberger
Barbara Schmidt
Jürgen J. Wenzel
Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Viruses
SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
throat washing
nasopharyngeal swab
oropharyngeal swab
saliva
author_facet Florian Hitzenbichler
Stilla Bauernfeind
Bernd Salzberger
Barbara Schmidt
Jürgen J. Wenzel
author_sort Florian Hitzenbichler
title Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_short Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Throat Washings, Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Oropharyngeal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort comparison of throat washings, nasopharyngeal swabs and oropharyngeal swabs for detection of sars-cov-2
publisher MDPI AG
series Viruses
issn 1999-4915
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is detected by reverse-transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) from respiratory specimens. This study compares throat washings (TW), nasopharyngeal swabs (NS) and oropharyngeal swabs (OS). A total of 102 samples from 34 adult patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were analysed by RT-qPCR with absolute quantification. The median concentrations and diagnostic sensitivities were <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>5</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>8</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> copies/mL, 85% (NS), <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>4</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 79% (OS) and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>4</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>3</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, 85% (TW). Concentration differences were significant between NS and TW (<i>P</i> = 0.019). Saliva (SA) was available from 21 patients (median <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>3</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>4</mn><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mn>3</mn></msup></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). OS and TW can be considered for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics, although with slightly lower concentrations.
topic SARS-CoV-2
COVID-19
throat washing
nasopharyngeal swab
oropharyngeal swab
saliva
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/13/4/653
work_keys_str_mv AT florianhitzenbichler comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2
AT stillabauernfeind comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2
AT berndsalzberger comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2
AT barbaraschmidt comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2
AT jurgenjwenzel comparisonofthroatwashingsnasopharyngealswabsandoropharyngealswabsfordetectionofsarscov2
_version_ 1721531750680625152