Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro

The paper discusses the transfer of the Central de Audiência de Custódia from the Rio de Janeiro’s Court of Justice to the José Frederico Marques Jail, in Benfica, in light of three aspects: a) the displacement of the justice service; b) the public dimension of justice; and (c) the understanding abo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: João Vitor Freitas Duarte Abreu, Pedro Heitor Barros Geraldo
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 2019-07-01
Series:Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/dilemas/article/view/23161
id doaj-b088273a9ec24f55a5de2aea1c5c9e7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b088273a9ec24f55a5de2aea1c5c9e7f2020-11-25T04:00:18ZspaUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroDilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social1983-59222178-27922019-07-01009711313011Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de JaneiroJoão Vitor Freitas Duarte Abreu0Pedro Heitor Barros Geraldo1Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, BrasilUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, BrasilThe paper discusses the transfer of the Central de Audiência de Custódia from the Rio de Janeiro’s Court of Justice to the José Frederico Marques Jail, in Benfica, in light of three aspects: a) the displacement of the justice service; b) the public dimension of justice; and (c) the understanding about incarceration device enhancement. The data was collected during fieldwork carried out between June 2017 and May 2018. Conducting the hearings in the public jail restricts public access to the hearing. The change has also favored the decision to keep prisoners in custody, producing an enhancement of the incarceration device.https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/dilemas/article/view/23161audiência de custódia, serviços de justiça, prisão provisória, encarceramento, Rio de Janeiro
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author João Vitor Freitas Duarte Abreu
Pedro Heitor Barros Geraldo
spellingShingle João Vitor Freitas Duarte Abreu
Pedro Heitor Barros Geraldo
Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro
Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social
audiência de custódia, serviços de justiça, prisão provisória, encarceramento, Rio de Janeiro
author_facet João Vitor Freitas Duarte Abreu
Pedro Heitor Barros Geraldo
author_sort João Vitor Freitas Duarte Abreu
title Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro
title_short Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro
title_full Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro
title_fullStr Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro
title_full_unstemmed Detention Hearings: An Analysis of the Displacement Policy of Pretrial Detention Hearings to the Public Jail in the City of Rio de Janeiro
title_sort detention hearings: an analysis of the displacement policy of pretrial detention hearings to the public jail in the city of rio de janeiro
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
series Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social
issn 1983-5922
2178-2792
publishDate 2019-07-01
description The paper discusses the transfer of the Central de Audiência de Custódia from the Rio de Janeiro’s Court of Justice to the José Frederico Marques Jail, in Benfica, in light of three aspects: a) the displacement of the justice service; b) the public dimension of justice; and (c) the understanding about incarceration device enhancement. The data was collected during fieldwork carried out between June 2017 and May 2018. Conducting the hearings in the public jail restricts public access to the hearing. The change has also favored the decision to keep prisoners in custody, producing an enhancement of the incarceration device.
topic audiência de custódia, serviços de justiça, prisão provisória, encarceramento, Rio de Janeiro
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/dilemas/article/view/23161
work_keys_str_mv AT joaovitorfreitasduarteabreu detentionhearingsananalysisofthedisplacementpolicyofpretrialdetentionhearingstothepublicjailinthecityofriodejaneiro
AT pedroheitorbarrosgeraldo detentionhearingsananalysisofthedisplacementpolicyofpretrialdetentionhearingstothepublicjailinthecityofriodejaneiro
_version_ 1724451407980920832