Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability

To make fast and accurate behavioural choices, we need to integrate the noisy sensory input, take into account prior knowledge, and adjust our decision criteria. It was shown previously that in a two alternative forced choice tasks, optimal decision making can be formalized in the framework of a seq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sophie eDeneve
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00075/full
id doaj-b08b3e2515dd4e15914b09fa90b2fe2f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b08b3e2515dd4e15914b09fa90b2fe2f2020-11-24T21:01:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2012-06-01610.3389/fnins.2012.0007521473Making decisions with unknown sensory reliabilitySophie eDeneve0Ecole Normale SupérieureTo make fast and accurate behavioural choices, we need to integrate the noisy sensory input, take into account prior knowledge, and adjust our decision criteria. It was shown previously that in a two alternative forced choice tasks, optimal decision making can be formalized in the framework of a sequential probability ratio test and is then equivalent to a diffusion model. However, this analogy hides a chicken and egg problem: To know how quickly we should integrate the sensory input and to set the optimal decision threshold, the reliability of the sensory observations has to be known in advance. Most of the time, we cannot know this reliability without first observing the decision outcome. We consider here a Bayesian decision model simultaneously inferring the probability of two different choice alternatives and estimating at the same time the reliability of the sensory information on which this choice is based. We show that this can be done within a single trial, based on the noisy responses of sensory spiking neurons. The resulting model is a non-linear diffusion to bound where the weight of the sensory inputs and the decision threshold are both dynamically changing over time. In difficult decision trials, sensory inputs early in the trial have a stronger impact on the decision, and the threshold collapse such that choices are made faster but with low accuracy. The reverse is true in easy trial: the sensory weight and the threshold increase over time, leading to slower decisions but at much higher accuracy. In contrast to standard diffusion model, adaptive sensory weights construct an accurate representation for the probability of each choice. This information can thus be appropriately combined with other unreliable cues, such as priors. We show that this model can account for recent findings in a motion discrimination task, and can be implemented in a neural architecture by fast Hebbian learning.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00075/fullDecision MakingadaptationPriorBayesianuncertaintyexpectation-maximization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sophie eDeneve
spellingShingle Sophie eDeneve
Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Decision Making
adaptation
Prior
Bayesian
uncertainty
expectation-maximization
author_facet Sophie eDeneve
author_sort Sophie eDeneve
title Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
title_short Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
title_full Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
title_fullStr Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
title_full_unstemmed Making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
title_sort making decisions with unknown sensory reliability
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2012-06-01
description To make fast and accurate behavioural choices, we need to integrate the noisy sensory input, take into account prior knowledge, and adjust our decision criteria. It was shown previously that in a two alternative forced choice tasks, optimal decision making can be formalized in the framework of a sequential probability ratio test and is then equivalent to a diffusion model. However, this analogy hides a chicken and egg problem: To know how quickly we should integrate the sensory input and to set the optimal decision threshold, the reliability of the sensory observations has to be known in advance. Most of the time, we cannot know this reliability without first observing the decision outcome. We consider here a Bayesian decision model simultaneously inferring the probability of two different choice alternatives and estimating at the same time the reliability of the sensory information on which this choice is based. We show that this can be done within a single trial, based on the noisy responses of sensory spiking neurons. The resulting model is a non-linear diffusion to bound where the weight of the sensory inputs and the decision threshold are both dynamically changing over time. In difficult decision trials, sensory inputs early in the trial have a stronger impact on the decision, and the threshold collapse such that choices are made faster but with low accuracy. The reverse is true in easy trial: the sensory weight and the threshold increase over time, leading to slower decisions but at much higher accuracy. In contrast to standard diffusion model, adaptive sensory weights construct an accurate representation for the probability of each choice. This information can thus be appropriately combined with other unreliable cues, such as priors. We show that this model can account for recent findings in a motion discrimination task, and can be implemented in a neural architecture by fast Hebbian learning.
topic Decision Making
adaptation
Prior
Bayesian
uncertainty
expectation-maximization
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2012.00075/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sophieedeneve makingdecisionswithunknownsensoryreliability
_version_ 1716777786405814272