AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE

Purpose. The article is devoted to the development trends of pedagogical communication in particular and the educational paradigm in general, as being relevant to a rapidly changing reality. The subject of the analysis is modern pedagogical discourse, as well as the complex of pragma-communicative c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatyana Pavlovna Paliy, Alexander Yurevich Bagiyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science and Innovation Center Publishing House 2020-10-01
Series:Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal-s.org/index.php/mrsp/article/view/12908
id doaj-b0bd2c2595e34b74b3261f381e4faf82
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0bd2c2595e34b74b3261f381e4faf822021-10-02T19:14:14ZengScience and Innovation Center Publishing HouseSovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem2077-17702218-74052020-10-0112527228310.12731/2077-1770-2020-5-272-2837912AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSETatyana Pavlovna Paliy0Alexander Yurevich Bagiyan1ФГБОУ ВО Пятигорский государственный университетФГБОУ ВО Пятигорский государственный университетPurpose. The article is devoted to the development trends of pedagogical communication in particular and the educational paradigm in general, as being relevant to a rapidly changing reality. The subject of the analysis is modern pedagogical discourse, as well as the complex of pragma-communicative characteristics of metadialogue activity of communication subjects. The purpose of the study is to identify the characteristic features of the pedagogical discourse subjects functioning on a pragma-communicative approach. Methodology. The research is based on the descriptive, convergent and phenomenological methods, as well as the principle of discursive modeling of a pedagogical communicative situation. Results. The institutional nature of pedagogical discourse implies a special nature of the interaction of communicants in the framework of metadialogue communication. The categories of addressee and addresser are essential here, since each category has a special set of pragmatic units that helps participants achieve the main goal of communication. It should also be noted that the functions of the addressee and addresser are not static and can be transferred, merged, changed within the framework of one pedagogical communicative situation in a particular social context. Practical implications. The results of the study can be applied as a theoretical and practical material in courses on the theory of discourse, intercultural communication theory and practice of translation, axiology and stylistics.http://journal-s.org/index.php/mrsp/article/view/12908дискурскоммуникативная ситуацияадресатадресантпрагматический подходконвергентностьфасцинация
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tatyana Pavlovna Paliy
Alexander Yurevich Bagiyan
spellingShingle Tatyana Pavlovna Paliy
Alexander Yurevich Bagiyan
AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE
Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem
дискурс
коммуникативная ситуация
адресат
адресант
прагматический подход
конвергентность
фасцинация
author_facet Tatyana Pavlovna Paliy
Alexander Yurevich Bagiyan
author_sort Tatyana Pavlovna Paliy
title AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE
title_short AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE
title_full AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE
title_fullStr AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE
title_full_unstemmed AUTHORITY AND MINORITY LINGUISTIC IDENTITIES IN MODERN PEDAGOGICAL DISCOURSE
title_sort authority and minority linguistic identities in modern pedagogical discourse
publisher Science and Innovation Center Publishing House
series Sovremennye Issledovaniâ Socialʹnyh Problem
issn 2077-1770
2218-7405
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Purpose. The article is devoted to the development trends of pedagogical communication in particular and the educational paradigm in general, as being relevant to a rapidly changing reality. The subject of the analysis is modern pedagogical discourse, as well as the complex of pragma-communicative characteristics of metadialogue activity of communication subjects. The purpose of the study is to identify the characteristic features of the pedagogical discourse subjects functioning on a pragma-communicative approach. Methodology. The research is based on the descriptive, convergent and phenomenological methods, as well as the principle of discursive modeling of a pedagogical communicative situation. Results. The institutional nature of pedagogical discourse implies a special nature of the interaction of communicants in the framework of metadialogue communication. The categories of addressee and addresser are essential here, since each category has a special set of pragmatic units that helps participants achieve the main goal of communication. It should also be noted that the functions of the addressee and addresser are not static and can be transferred, merged, changed within the framework of one pedagogical communicative situation in a particular social context. Practical implications. The results of the study can be applied as a theoretical and practical material in courses on the theory of discourse, intercultural communication theory and practice of translation, axiology and stylistics.
topic дискурс
коммуникативная ситуация
адресат
адресант
прагматический подход
конвергентность
фасцинация
url http://journal-s.org/index.php/mrsp/article/view/12908
work_keys_str_mv AT tatyanapavlovnapaliy authorityandminoritylinguisticidentitiesinmodernpedagogicaldiscourse
AT alexanderyurevichbagiyan authorityandminoritylinguisticidentitiesinmodernpedagogicaldiscourse
_version_ 1716847682469756928