Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions

Background: The goal of this study is to extend the applications of parametric survival models so that they include cases in which accelerated failure time (AFT) assumption is not satisfied, and examine parametric and semiparametric models under different proportional hazards (PH) and AFT assumption...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Abadi, Farzaneh Amanpour, Chris Bajdik, Parvin Yavari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Preventive Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2008-7802;year=2012;volume=3;issue=9;spage=644;epage=651;aulast=Abadi
id doaj-b0d658a9015f43afac1929288b9538c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0d658a9015f43afac1929288b9538c82020-11-24T23:16:51ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsInternational Journal of Preventive Medicine2008-78022008-82132012-01-0139644651Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptionsAlireza AbadiFarzaneh AmanpourChris BajdikParvin YavariBackground: The goal of this study is to extend the applications of parametric survival models so that they include cases in which accelerated failure time (AFT) assumption is not satisfied, and examine parametric and semiparametric models under different proportional hazards (PH) and AFT assumptions. Methods: The data for 12,531 women diagnosed with breast cancer in British Columbia, Canada, during 1990-1999 were divided into eight groups according to patients′ ages and stage of disease, and each group was assumed to have different AFT and PH assumptions. For parametric models, we fitted the saturated generalized gamma (GG) distribution, and compared this with the conventional AFT model. Using a likelihood ratio statistic, both models were compared to the simpler forms including the Weibull and lognormal. For semiparametric models, either Cox′s PH model or stratified Cox model was fitted according to the PH assumption and tested using Schoenfeld residuals. The GG family was compared to the log-logistic model using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Baysian information criterion (BIC). Results: When PH and AFT assumptions were satisfied, semiparametric and parametric models both provided valid descriptions of breast cancer patient survival. When PH assumption was not satisfied but AFT condition held, the parametric models performed better than the stratified Cox model. When neither the PH nor the AFT assumptions were met, the log normal distribution provided a reasonable fit. Conclusions: When both the PH and AFT assumptions are satisfied, the parametric and semiparametric models provide complementary information. When PH assumption is not satisfied, the parametric models should be considered, whether the AFT assumption is met or not.http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2008-7802;year=2012;volume=3;issue=9;spage=644;epage=651;aulast=AbadiBreast cancergeneralized gamma distributionparametric regressionstratified Cox modelsurvival analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alireza Abadi
Farzaneh Amanpour
Chris Bajdik
Parvin Yavari
spellingShingle Alireza Abadi
Farzaneh Amanpour
Chris Bajdik
Parvin Yavari
Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
International Journal of Preventive Medicine
Breast cancer
generalized gamma distribution
parametric regression
stratified Cox model
survival analysis
author_facet Alireza Abadi
Farzaneh Amanpour
Chris Bajdik
Parvin Yavari
author_sort Alireza Abadi
title Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
title_short Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
title_full Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
title_fullStr Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer survival analysis: Applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
title_sort breast cancer survival analysis: applying the generalized gamma distribution under different conditions of the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time assumptions
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series International Journal of Preventive Medicine
issn 2008-7802
2008-8213
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: The goal of this study is to extend the applications of parametric survival models so that they include cases in which accelerated failure time (AFT) assumption is not satisfied, and examine parametric and semiparametric models under different proportional hazards (PH) and AFT assumptions. Methods: The data for 12,531 women diagnosed with breast cancer in British Columbia, Canada, during 1990-1999 were divided into eight groups according to patients′ ages and stage of disease, and each group was assumed to have different AFT and PH assumptions. For parametric models, we fitted the saturated generalized gamma (GG) distribution, and compared this with the conventional AFT model. Using a likelihood ratio statistic, both models were compared to the simpler forms including the Weibull and lognormal. For semiparametric models, either Cox′s PH model or stratified Cox model was fitted according to the PH assumption and tested using Schoenfeld residuals. The GG family was compared to the log-logistic model using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Baysian information criterion (BIC). Results: When PH and AFT assumptions were satisfied, semiparametric and parametric models both provided valid descriptions of breast cancer patient survival. When PH assumption was not satisfied but AFT condition held, the parametric models performed better than the stratified Cox model. When neither the PH nor the AFT assumptions were met, the log normal distribution provided a reasonable fit. Conclusions: When both the PH and AFT assumptions are satisfied, the parametric and semiparametric models provide complementary information. When PH assumption is not satisfied, the parametric models should be considered, whether the AFT assumption is met or not.
topic Breast cancer
generalized gamma distribution
parametric regression
stratified Cox model
survival analysis
url http://www.ijpvmjournal.net/article.asp?issn=2008-7802;year=2012;volume=3;issue=9;spage=644;epage=651;aulast=Abadi
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezaabadi breastcancersurvivalanalysisapplyingthegeneralizedgammadistributionunderdifferentconditionsoftheproportionalhazardsandacceleratedfailuretimeassumptions
AT farzanehamanpour breastcancersurvivalanalysisapplyingthegeneralizedgammadistributionunderdifferentconditionsoftheproportionalhazardsandacceleratedfailuretimeassumptions
AT chrisbajdik breastcancersurvivalanalysisapplyingthegeneralizedgammadistributionunderdifferentconditionsoftheproportionalhazardsandacceleratedfailuretimeassumptions
AT parvinyavari breastcancersurvivalanalysisapplyingthegeneralizedgammadistributionunderdifferentconditionsoftheproportionalhazardsandacceleratedfailuretimeassumptions
_version_ 1725586085447204864