Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study

Human activity recognition is an emerging field of ubiquitous and pervasive computing. Although recent smartphones have powerful resources, the execution of machine learning algorithms on a large amount of data is still a burden on smartphones. Three major factors including; classification algorithm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Arshad Awan, Zheng Guangbin, Cheong-Ghil Kim, Shin-Dug Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2014-11-01
Series:International Journal of Networked and Distributed Computing (IJNDC)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/14324.pdf
id doaj-b0ec358a69e14622b83a980d6165d358
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b0ec358a69e14622b83a980d6165d3582020-11-24T21:15:22ZengAtlantis PressInternational Journal of Networked and Distributed Computing (IJNDC)2211-79462014-11-012410.2991/ijndc.2014.2.4.3Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative StudyMuhammad Arshad AwanZheng GuangbinCheong-Ghil KimShin-Dug KimHuman activity recognition is an emerging field of ubiquitous and pervasive computing. Although recent smartphones have powerful resources, the execution of machine learning algorithms on a large amount of data is still a burden on smartphones. Three major factors including; classification algorithm, data feature, and smartphone position influence the recognition accuracy and time. In this paper, we present a comparative study of six classification algorithms, six data features, and four different positions that are most commonly used in the recognition process using smartphone accelerometer. This analysis can be used to select any specific classification algorithm, data feature, and smartphone position for human activity recognition in terms of accuracy and response time. The methodology we used is composed of two major components; a data collector, and a classifier. A set of eleven activities of daily living, four different positions for data collection and ten volunteers contributed to make it a worth-full comparative study. Results show that K-Nearest Neighbor and J48 algorithms performed well both in terms of time and accuracy irrespective of data features whereas the performance of other algorithms is dependent on the selected data features. Similarly, mean and mode features gave good results in terms of accuracy irrespective of the classification algorithm. A short version of the paper has already been presented at ICIS 2014.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/14324.pdfActivity recognition; classification algorithm; data feature; smartphone position; ubiquitous computing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muhammad Arshad Awan
Zheng Guangbin
Cheong-Ghil Kim
Shin-Dug Kim
spellingShingle Muhammad Arshad Awan
Zheng Guangbin
Cheong-Ghil Kim
Shin-Dug Kim
Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study
International Journal of Networked and Distributed Computing (IJNDC)
Activity recognition; classification algorithm; data feature; smartphone position; ubiquitous computing
author_facet Muhammad Arshad Awan
Zheng Guangbin
Cheong-Ghil Kim
Shin-Dug Kim
author_sort Muhammad Arshad Awan
title Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study
title_short Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study
title_full Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Human Activity Recognition in WSN: A Comparative Study
title_sort human activity recognition in wsn: a comparative study
publisher Atlantis Press
series International Journal of Networked and Distributed Computing (IJNDC)
issn 2211-7946
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Human activity recognition is an emerging field of ubiquitous and pervasive computing. Although recent smartphones have powerful resources, the execution of machine learning algorithms on a large amount of data is still a burden on smartphones. Three major factors including; classification algorithm, data feature, and smartphone position influence the recognition accuracy and time. In this paper, we present a comparative study of six classification algorithms, six data features, and four different positions that are most commonly used in the recognition process using smartphone accelerometer. This analysis can be used to select any specific classification algorithm, data feature, and smartphone position for human activity recognition in terms of accuracy and response time. The methodology we used is composed of two major components; a data collector, and a classifier. A set of eleven activities of daily living, four different positions for data collection and ten volunteers contributed to make it a worth-full comparative study. Results show that K-Nearest Neighbor and J48 algorithms performed well both in terms of time and accuracy irrespective of data features whereas the performance of other algorithms is dependent on the selected data features. Similarly, mean and mode features gave good results in terms of accuracy irrespective of the classification algorithm. A short version of the paper has already been presented at ICIS 2014.
topic Activity recognition; classification algorithm; data feature; smartphone position; ubiquitous computing
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/14324.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadarshadawan humanactivityrecognitioninwsnacomparativestudy
AT zhengguangbin humanactivityrecognitioninwsnacomparativestudy
AT cheongghilkim humanactivityrecognitioninwsnacomparativestudy
AT shindugkim humanactivityrecognitioninwsnacomparativestudy
_version_ 1716745523329761280