Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)

This article aims to determine whether the inequal distribution of social groups in space is worsening in the three largest French cities (Paris, Lyon, Marseille) from 1999 to 2013. Following a previous study, this one proposes an approach at sub-communal level (IRIS) on a large scale (urban area) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Quentin Godoye, Sébastien Oliveau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille 2019-09-01
Series:Espace populations sociétés
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/eps/8914
id doaj-b1008b31fc164d7b9e069197119ad0c4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1008b31fc164d7b9e069197119ad0c42020-11-25T01:59:00ZengUniversité des Sciences et Technologies de LilleEspace populations sociétés0755-78092019-09-012019210.4000/eps.8914Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)Quentin GodoyeSébastien OliveauThis article aims to determine whether the inequal distribution of social groups in space is worsening in the three largest French cities (Paris, Lyon, Marseille) from 1999 to 2013. Following a previous study, this one proposes an approach at sub-communal level (IRIS) on a large scale (urban area) and takes different dates of census into account (1999-2006-2013). It also mobilizes and crosses a wide range of methods: cartography, statistics (segregation indices, classifications) and geostatistics (measurement of spatial autocorrelation).The results remind us that the spatial structures of the three cities, although different, show that similar logics. Thus we note that age groups are much less unequally distributed than groups of workers. On the other side, the diachronic approach emphasizes that the identified structures remain surprisingly stable during the last 20 years. Contrary to wisdom, spatial inequalities do not seem to widen over time, with the exception of managers and professionals, which seem to be more and more grouped over time.http://journals.openedition.org/eps/8914spatial inequalitiesurban structureLISAsegregation indices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Quentin Godoye
Sébastien Oliveau
spellingShingle Quentin Godoye
Sébastien Oliveau
Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)
Espace populations sociétés
spatial inequalities
urban structure
LISA
segregation indices
author_facet Quentin Godoye
Sébastien Oliveau
author_sort Quentin Godoye
title Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)
title_short Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)
title_full Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)
title_fullStr Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)
title_full_unstemmed Explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. Analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de Paris, Lyon et Marseille (1999-2013)
title_sort explorer les inégalités sociales dans l’espace et le temps. analyse diachronique des aires urbaines de paris, lyon et marseille (1999-2013)
publisher Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille
series Espace populations sociétés
issn 0755-7809
publishDate 2019-09-01
description This article aims to determine whether the inequal distribution of social groups in space is worsening in the three largest French cities (Paris, Lyon, Marseille) from 1999 to 2013. Following a previous study, this one proposes an approach at sub-communal level (IRIS) on a large scale (urban area) and takes different dates of census into account (1999-2006-2013). It also mobilizes and crosses a wide range of methods: cartography, statistics (segregation indices, classifications) and geostatistics (measurement of spatial autocorrelation).The results remind us that the spatial structures of the three cities, although different, show that similar logics. Thus we note that age groups are much less unequally distributed than groups of workers. On the other side, the diachronic approach emphasizes that the identified structures remain surprisingly stable during the last 20 years. Contrary to wisdom, spatial inequalities do not seem to widen over time, with the exception of managers and professionals, which seem to be more and more grouped over time.
topic spatial inequalities
urban structure
LISA
segregation indices
url http://journals.openedition.org/eps/8914
work_keys_str_mv AT quentingodoye explorerlesinegalitessocialesdanslespaceetletempsanalysediachroniquedesairesurbainesdeparislyonetmarseille19992013
AT sebastienoliveau explorerlesinegalitessocialesdanslespaceetletempsanalysediachroniquedesairesurbainesdeparislyonetmarseille19992013
_version_ 1724966563992305664