Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS

Background: The majority of cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by focal cortical atrophy with an underlying tau or TDP-43 proteinopathy. A subset of FTLD cases, however, lack tau and TDP-43 immunoreactivity, but have neuronal inclusions positive for ubiquitin, refer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin F Bieniek, Keith Anthony Josephs, Wen-Lang Lin, Dennis W Dickson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Münster / Open Journals System 2020-03-01
Series:Free Neuropathology
Subjects:
FUS
Online Access:https://www.uni-muenster.de/Ejournals/index.php/fnp/article/view/2639
id doaj-b1053bf272a349769d3e5604473f566c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1053bf272a349769d3e5604473f566c2021-02-17T17:09:04ZengUniversity of Münster / Open Journals SystemFree Neuropathology2699-44452020-03-01110.17879/freeneuropathology-2020-26392639Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUSKevin F Bieniek0Keith Anthony Josephs1Wen-Lang Lin2Dennis W Dickson3Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USADepartment of Neurology (Behavioral Neurology & Movement Disorders) Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADepartment of Neuroscience (Neuropathology), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USADepartment of Neuroscience (Neuropathology), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA Background: The majority of cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by focal cortical atrophy with an underlying tau or TDP-43 proteinopathy. A subset of FTLD cases, however, lack tau and TDP-43 immunoreactivity, but have neuronal inclusions positive for ubiquitin, referred to as atypical FTLD (aFTLD-U). Studies have demonstrated that ubiquitin-positive inclusions in aFTLD-U are immunoreactive for fused in sarcoma (FUS). As such, the current nosology for this entity is FTLD-FUS, which is thought to include not only aFTLD-U but also neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease (NIFID) and basophilic inclusion body disease. Objective: To compare pathological features of cases of aFTLD-U and NIFID. Methods: We reviewed the neuropathology of 15 patients (10 males and 5 females; average age at death 54 years (range 41-69 years)) with an antemortem clinical diagnosis of a frontotemporal dementia and pathological diagnosis of aFTLD-U (n=8) or NIFID (n=7). Sections were processed for immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy with FUS, TDP-43, and α-internexin (αINX) antibodies. Results: Eight cases had pathologic features consistent with FTLD-FUS, with severe striatal atrophy (7/8 cases), as well as FUS-positive neuronal cytoplasmic and vermiform intranuclear inclusions, but no αINX immunoreactivity. Five cases had features consistent with NIFID, with neuronal inclusions positive for both FUS and αINX. Striatal atrophy was present in only two of the NIFID cases. Two cases had αINX-positive neuronal inclusions consistent with NIFID, but both lacked striatal atrophy and FUS immunoreactivity. Surprisingly, one of these two NIFID cases had lesions immunoreactive for TDP-43. Discussion: While FUS pathology remains a prominent feature of aFTLD-U, there is pathologic heterogeneity, including rare cases of NIFID with TDP-43- rather than FUS-positive inclusions. https://www.uni-muenster.de/Ejournals/index.php/fnp/article/view/2639FUSTDP-43Atypical frontotemporal lobar degenerationNIFIDElectron microscope
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin F Bieniek
Keith Anthony Josephs
Wen-Lang Lin
Dennis W Dickson
spellingShingle Kevin F Bieniek
Keith Anthony Josephs
Wen-Lang Lin
Dennis W Dickson
Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS
Free Neuropathology
FUS
TDP-43
Atypical frontotemporal lobar degeneration
NIFID
Electron microscope
author_facet Kevin F Bieniek
Keith Anthony Josephs
Wen-Lang Lin
Dennis W Dickson
author_sort Kevin F Bieniek
title Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS
title_short Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS
title_full Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS
title_fullStr Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS
title_full_unstemmed Neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of FTLD-FUS
title_sort neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease may be incorrectly classified as a subtype of ftld-fus
publisher University of Münster / Open Journals System
series Free Neuropathology
issn 2699-4445
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Background: The majority of cases of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are characterized by focal cortical atrophy with an underlying tau or TDP-43 proteinopathy. A subset of FTLD cases, however, lack tau and TDP-43 immunoreactivity, but have neuronal inclusions positive for ubiquitin, referred to as atypical FTLD (aFTLD-U). Studies have demonstrated that ubiquitin-positive inclusions in aFTLD-U are immunoreactive for fused in sarcoma (FUS). As such, the current nosology for this entity is FTLD-FUS, which is thought to include not only aFTLD-U but also neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease (NIFID) and basophilic inclusion body disease. Objective: To compare pathological features of cases of aFTLD-U and NIFID. Methods: We reviewed the neuropathology of 15 patients (10 males and 5 females; average age at death 54 years (range 41-69 years)) with an antemortem clinical diagnosis of a frontotemporal dementia and pathological diagnosis of aFTLD-U (n=8) or NIFID (n=7). Sections were processed for immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy with FUS, TDP-43, and α-internexin (αINX) antibodies. Results: Eight cases had pathologic features consistent with FTLD-FUS, with severe striatal atrophy (7/8 cases), as well as FUS-positive neuronal cytoplasmic and vermiform intranuclear inclusions, but no αINX immunoreactivity. Five cases had features consistent with NIFID, with neuronal inclusions positive for both FUS and αINX. Striatal atrophy was present in only two of the NIFID cases. Two cases had αINX-positive neuronal inclusions consistent with NIFID, but both lacked striatal atrophy and FUS immunoreactivity. Surprisingly, one of these two NIFID cases had lesions immunoreactive for TDP-43. Discussion: While FUS pathology remains a prominent feature of aFTLD-U, there is pathologic heterogeneity, including rare cases of NIFID with TDP-43- rather than FUS-positive inclusions.
topic FUS
TDP-43
Atypical frontotemporal lobar degeneration
NIFID
Electron microscope
url https://www.uni-muenster.de/Ejournals/index.php/fnp/article/view/2639
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinfbieniek neuronalintermediatefilamentinclusiondiseasemaybeincorrectlyclassifiedasasubtypeofftldfus
AT keithanthonyjosephs neuronalintermediatefilamentinclusiondiseasemaybeincorrectlyclassifiedasasubtypeofftldfus
AT wenlanglin neuronalintermediatefilamentinclusiondiseasemaybeincorrectlyclassifiedasasubtypeofftldfus
AT denniswdickson neuronalintermediatefilamentinclusiondiseasemaybeincorrectlyclassifiedasasubtypeofftldfus
_version_ 1724264918006366208