Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection

Introduction: Current guidelines for prophylactic resection of ascending aortic aneurysms are based on post-dissection aortic diameter. However, this may not reflect the diameter prior to dissection. Report: Pre- and post-dissection aortic diameters were compared in 34 patients with available comput...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qais W. Saleh, Axel C.P. Diederichsen, Jes S. Lindholt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-01-01
Series:EJVES Vascular Forum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X2030068X
id doaj-b10eadd18249420cb31349eaccee5ae1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b10eadd18249420cb31349eaccee5ae12020-12-30T04:24:18ZengElsevierEJVES Vascular Forum2666-688X2020-01-01492022Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before DissectionQais W. Saleh0Axel C.P. Diederichsen1Jes S. Lindholt2Department of Thoracic-, Cardiac- and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Centre for Individualised Medicine in Arterial Diseases (CIMA), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Centre of Clinical Excellence in Southern Denmark (CAVAC), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Corresponding author. Fuglsang 77, third floor, 5270 Odense N, Denmark.Centre for Individualised Medicine in Arterial Diseases (CIMA), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Centre of Clinical Excellence in Southern Denmark (CAVAC), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, DenmarkDepartment of Thoracic-, Cardiac- and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Centre for Individualised Medicine in Arterial Diseases (CIMA), Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Centre of Clinical Excellence in Southern Denmark (CAVAC), Odense University Hospital, DenmarkIntroduction: Current guidelines for prophylactic resection of ascending aortic aneurysms are based on post-dissection aortic diameter. However, this may not reflect the diameter prior to dissection. Report: Pre- and post-dissection aortic diameters were compared in 34 patients with available computerised tomography scans. The median time interval between these scans was 536 days (interquartile range 354 – 1237). Discussion: There was a statistically significant difference in diameters from the sinotubular junction to the proximal abdominal aorta, the largest was in the ascending aorta with a mean of 7.6 mm (standard deviation 4.5). This suggests that the ascending aortic diameter is a poor predictor of dissection in most patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X2030068XAcute diseaseAortic aneurysmComputed tomographyDissectingOrgan SizeThoracic aneurysm
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qais W. Saleh
Axel C.P. Diederichsen
Jes S. Lindholt
spellingShingle Qais W. Saleh
Axel C.P. Diederichsen
Jes S. Lindholt
Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection
EJVES Vascular Forum
Acute disease
Aortic aneurysm
Computed tomography
Dissecting
Organ Size
Thoracic aneurysm
author_facet Qais W. Saleh
Axel C.P. Diederichsen
Jes S. Lindholt
author_sort Qais W. Saleh
title Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection
title_short Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection
title_full Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection
title_fullStr Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection
title_full_unstemmed Ascending Aortic Diameter after Dissection Does Not Reflect Size before Dissection
title_sort ascending aortic diameter after dissection does not reflect size before dissection
publisher Elsevier
series EJVES Vascular Forum
issn 2666-688X
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Introduction: Current guidelines for prophylactic resection of ascending aortic aneurysms are based on post-dissection aortic diameter. However, this may not reflect the diameter prior to dissection. Report: Pre- and post-dissection aortic diameters were compared in 34 patients with available computerised tomography scans. The median time interval between these scans was 536 days (interquartile range 354 – 1237). Discussion: There was a statistically significant difference in diameters from the sinotubular junction to the proximal abdominal aorta, the largest was in the ascending aorta with a mean of 7.6 mm (standard deviation 4.5). This suggests that the ascending aortic diameter is a poor predictor of dissection in most patients.
topic Acute disease
Aortic aneurysm
Computed tomography
Dissecting
Organ Size
Thoracic aneurysm
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X2030068X
work_keys_str_mv AT qaiswsaleh ascendingaorticdiameterafterdissectiondoesnotreflectsizebeforedissection
AT axelcpdiederichsen ascendingaorticdiameterafterdissectiondoesnotreflectsizebeforedissection
AT jesslindholt ascendingaorticdiameterafterdissectiondoesnotreflectsizebeforedissection
_version_ 1724366034639519744