Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT

Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol has been proposed as a potentially proper option for the patients with limited ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, there is no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy between the GnRH antagonist and agonist cycles. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahbod Ebrahimi, Firouzeh Akbari-Asbagh, Mojgan Ghalandar-Attar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences 2017-08-01
Series:International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
Online Access:http://www.ssu.ac.ir/ijrm/index.php/ijrm/article/view/2415/pdf
id doaj-b123ca31b04549fdb5352c9fce5f1458
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b123ca31b04549fdb5352c9fce5f14582020-11-25T01:18:06ZengShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine2476-41082476-37722017-08-01152101108Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCTMahbod Ebrahimi0Firouzeh Akbari-Asbagh1Mojgan Ghalandar-Attar2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Unit, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol has been proposed as a potentially proper option for the patients with limited ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, there is no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy between the GnRH antagonist and agonist cycles. The use of aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole was suggested by some studies. Objective: The object of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of letrozole cotreatment with GnRH-antagonist protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Materials and Methods: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted on 70 infertile women with poor ovarian response based on Bologna criteria in two groups: letrozole+GnRH-antagonist (LA) group and placebo+GnRH-antagonist (PA) group (n=35/each). The LA group involved at letrozole 2.5 mg daily over 5 days and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone 225 IU/daily. The PA group received placebo over 5 days and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone at the same starting day and dose, similar to LA group. GnRH-antagonist was introduced once one or more follicle reached ≥14 mm. The main outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, implantation rate, cycle cancellation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (p=0.81), number of embryos transferred (p=0.82), fertilization rate (p=0.225), implantation rate (p=0.72), total cycle cancelation rate (p=0.08), and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.12). Conclusion: The use of letrozole in GnRH-antagonist cycles does not improve clinical outcomes in poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.http://www.ssu.ac.ir/ijrm/index.php/ijrm/article/view/2415/pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahbod Ebrahimi
Firouzeh Akbari-Asbagh
Mojgan Ghalandar-Attar
spellingShingle Mahbod Ebrahimi
Firouzeh Akbari-Asbagh
Mojgan Ghalandar-Attar
Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
author_facet Mahbod Ebrahimi
Firouzeh Akbari-Asbagh
Mojgan Ghalandar-Attar
author_sort Mahbod Ebrahimi
title Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
title_short Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
title_full Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
title_fullStr Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
title_full_unstemmed Letrozole+ GnRH antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: An RCT
title_sort letrozole+ gnrh antagonist stimulation protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: an rct
publisher Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
series International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine
issn 2476-4108
2476-3772
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol has been proposed as a potentially proper option for the patients with limited ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, there is no significant difference in terms of clinical pregnancy between the GnRH antagonist and agonist cycles. The use of aromatase inhibitors such as letrozole was suggested by some studies. Objective: The object of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of letrozole cotreatment with GnRH-antagonist protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Materials and Methods: A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted on 70 infertile women with poor ovarian response based on Bologna criteria in two groups: letrozole+GnRH-antagonist (LA) group and placebo+GnRH-antagonist (PA) group (n=35/each). The LA group involved at letrozole 2.5 mg daily over 5 days and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone 225 IU/daily. The PA group received placebo over 5 days and recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone at the same starting day and dose, similar to LA group. GnRH-antagonist was introduced once one or more follicle reached ≥14 mm. The main outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, implantation rate, cycle cancellation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between groups. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the number of oocytes retrieved (p=0.81), number of embryos transferred (p=0.82), fertilization rate (p=0.225), implantation rate (p=0.72), total cycle cancelation rate (p=0.08), and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.12). Conclusion: The use of letrozole in GnRH-antagonist cycles does not improve clinical outcomes in poor responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
url http://www.ssu.ac.ir/ijrm/index.php/ijrm/article/view/2415/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mahbodebrahimi letrozolegnrhantagoniststimulationprotocolinpoorovarianrespondersundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncyclesanrct
AT firouzehakbariasbagh letrozolegnrhantagoniststimulationprotocolinpoorovarianrespondersundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncyclesanrct
AT mojganghalandarattar letrozolegnrhantagoniststimulationprotocolinpoorovarianrespondersundergoingintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncyclesanrct
_version_ 1725143701731147776