Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy

The article critically examines the EU’s conceptualisation of the rule of law in its enlargement practice. Two main arguments will be advanced. First, it will be argued that legality is a core element of the rule of law, and adherence to it is a fundamental characteristic of any institutional order...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lisa Louwerse
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law 2019-12-01
Series:Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/352
id doaj-b136ffd2034749d98ded3df5a21173fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b136ffd2034749d98ded3df5a21173fb2020-11-25T03:45:57ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of LawCroatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy1845-56621848-99582019-12-0115275510.3935/cyelp.15.2019.352Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement PolicyLisa Louwerse0The Hague University of Applied SciencesThe article critically examines the EU’s conceptualisation of the rule of law in its enlargement practice. Two main arguments will be advanced. First, it will be argued that legality is a core element of the rule of law, and adherence to it is a fundamental characteristic of any institutional order governed by the rule of law, as evidenced in the Treaty (Article 2 TEU) and as acknowledged in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice. Secondly, it will be shown that the EU’s pre-accession process does not sufficiently address this rule of law element, to the extent that a) its main focus is alignment with the acquis, and b) changes made to domestic legislation are measured in terms of quantity and not quality. It will be demonstrated that this generates problems of legality in the candidate states, including legal inflation, instability, lack of generality of law and coherence, as well as problems of enforcement. It will be asserted that even though this is recognised by the Commission, over the years the EU has not amended its methodology, thereby failing to recognise that ensuring respect for the rule of law is not merely a process of adoption of a corpus of rules, but rather a complex process of adaptation to a particular value system. The article continues by arguing that the quality and complexity of the acquis leave considerable room for improvement, while at the same time raising questions as to its suitability as an instrument for development in the (potential) candidate countries. As a conclusion, some policy reflections will be offered on how these issues could be better addressed.https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/352eu rule of lawlegalityeu enlargementeu acquisquantitative approachbenchmarking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa Louwerse
spellingShingle Lisa Louwerse
Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy
Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
eu rule of law
legality
eu enlargement
eu acquis
quantitative approach
benchmarking
author_facet Lisa Louwerse
author_sort Lisa Louwerse
title Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy
title_short Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy
title_full Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy
title_fullStr Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy
title_full_unstemmed Mind the Gap: Issues of Legality in the EU’s Conceptualisation of the Rule of Law in Its Enlargement Policy
title_sort mind the gap: issues of legality in the eu’s conceptualisation of the rule of law in its enlargement policy
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Law
series Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy
issn 1845-5662
1848-9958
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The article critically examines the EU’s conceptualisation of the rule of law in its enlargement practice. Two main arguments will be advanced. First, it will be argued that legality is a core element of the rule of law, and adherence to it is a fundamental characteristic of any institutional order governed by the rule of law, as evidenced in the Treaty (Article 2 TEU) and as acknowledged in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice. Secondly, it will be shown that the EU’s pre-accession process does not sufficiently address this rule of law element, to the extent that a) its main focus is alignment with the acquis, and b) changes made to domestic legislation are measured in terms of quantity and not quality. It will be demonstrated that this generates problems of legality in the candidate states, including legal inflation, instability, lack of generality of law and coherence, as well as problems of enforcement. It will be asserted that even though this is recognised by the Commission, over the years the EU has not amended its methodology, thereby failing to recognise that ensuring respect for the rule of law is not merely a process of adoption of a corpus of rules, but rather a complex process of adaptation to a particular value system. The article continues by arguing that the quality and complexity of the acquis leave considerable room for improvement, while at the same time raising questions as to its suitability as an instrument for development in the (potential) candidate countries. As a conclusion, some policy reflections will be offered on how these issues could be better addressed.
topic eu rule of law
legality
eu enlargement
eu acquis
quantitative approach
benchmarking
url https://www.cyelp.com/index.php/cyelp/article/view/352
work_keys_str_mv AT lisalouwerse mindthegapissuesoflegalityintheeusconceptualisationoftheruleoflawinitsenlargementpolicy
_version_ 1724508719021031424