Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers

Objectives: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing in the U.S. Although marketed as a safer alternative for cigarettes, initial evidence suggests that e-cigarettes may pose a secondhand exposure risk. The current study explored the prevalence and correlates of support for e-cigarette b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie K. Kolar, Brooke G. Rogers, Monica Webb Hooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-11-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/12/12174
id doaj-b15876f5eb5341e39807a50d23d4153e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b15876f5eb5341e39807a50d23d4153e2020-11-24T23:21:12ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012014-11-011112121741218910.3390/ijerph111212174ijerph111212174Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former SmokersStephanie K. Kolar0Brooke G. Rogers1Monica Webb Hooper2Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USADepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USADepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USAObjectives: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing in the U.S. Although marketed as a safer alternative for cigarettes, initial evidence suggests that e-cigarettes may pose a secondhand exposure risk. The current study explored the prevalence and correlates of support for e-cigarette bans. Methods: A sample of 265 current/former smokers completed a cross-sectional telephone survey from June–September 2014; 45% Black, 31% White, 21% Hispanic. Items assessed support for home and workplace bans for cigarettes and e-cigarettes and associated risk perceptions. Results: Most participants were aware of e-cigarettes (99%). Results demonstrated less support for complete e-cigarette bans in homes and workplaces compared to cigarettes. Support for complete e-cigarette bans was strongest among older, higher income, married respondents, and former smokers. Complete e-cigarette bans were most strongly endorsed when perceptions of addictiveness and health risks were high. While both e-cigarette lifetime and never-users strongly supported cigarette smoking bans, endorsement for e-cigarette bans varied by lifetime use and intentions to use e-cigarettes. Conclusions: Support for indoor e-cigarette bans is relatively low among individuals with a smoking history. Support for e-cigarette bans may change as evidence regarding their use emerges. These findings have implications for public health policy.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/12/12174electronic cigaretteE-cigarettevapingsecondhand vapornicotineenvironmental smoke
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie K. Kolar
Brooke G. Rogers
Monica Webb Hooper
spellingShingle Stephanie K. Kolar
Brooke G. Rogers
Monica Webb Hooper
Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
electronic cigarette
E-cigarette
vaping
secondhand vapor
nicotine
environmental smoke
author_facet Stephanie K. Kolar
Brooke G. Rogers
Monica Webb Hooper
author_sort Stephanie K. Kolar
title Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
title_short Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
title_full Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
title_fullStr Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
title_full_unstemmed Support for Indoor Bans on Electronic Cigarettes among Current and Former Smokers
title_sort support for indoor bans on electronic cigarettes among current and former smokers
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2014-11-01
description Objectives: Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is increasing in the U.S. Although marketed as a safer alternative for cigarettes, initial evidence suggests that e-cigarettes may pose a secondhand exposure risk. The current study explored the prevalence and correlates of support for e-cigarette bans. Methods: A sample of 265 current/former smokers completed a cross-sectional telephone survey from June–September 2014; 45% Black, 31% White, 21% Hispanic. Items assessed support for home and workplace bans for cigarettes and e-cigarettes and associated risk perceptions. Results: Most participants were aware of e-cigarettes (99%). Results demonstrated less support for complete e-cigarette bans in homes and workplaces compared to cigarettes. Support for complete e-cigarette bans was strongest among older, higher income, married respondents, and former smokers. Complete e-cigarette bans were most strongly endorsed when perceptions of addictiveness and health risks were high. While both e-cigarette lifetime and never-users strongly supported cigarette smoking bans, endorsement for e-cigarette bans varied by lifetime use and intentions to use e-cigarettes. Conclusions: Support for indoor e-cigarette bans is relatively low among individuals with a smoking history. Support for e-cigarette bans may change as evidence regarding their use emerges. These findings have implications for public health policy.
topic electronic cigarette
E-cigarette
vaping
secondhand vapor
nicotine
environmental smoke
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/12/12174
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaniekkolar supportforindoorbansonelectroniccigarettesamongcurrentandformersmokers
AT brookegrogers supportforindoorbansonelectroniccigarettesamongcurrentandformersmokers
AT monicawebbhooper supportforindoorbansonelectroniccigarettesamongcurrentandformersmokers
_version_ 1725572280753324032