Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: This meta-analysis was performed to compare polymyxin monotherapy and polymyxin-based combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) infections. Methods: We conducted searches on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Collaborative database for both observational studie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Si-Yuan Hou, Dan Wu, Xing-Huo Feng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716520302320
id doaj-b1936db216a74504ae017e16ec0e950d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1936db216a74504ae017e16ec0e950d2021-05-21T04:21:01ZengElsevierJournal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance2213-71652020-12-0123197202Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysisSi-Yuan Hou0Dan Wu1Xing-Huo Feng2Intensive Care Unit, The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Province, NO. 33 Wenyi Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China; Corresponding authors.Second Department of Rheumatology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, 39 Huaxiang Road, Tiexi District, Shenyang, Liaoning 110022, ChinaIntensive Care Unit, The People’s Hospital of Liaoning Province, NO. 33 Wenyi Road, Shenhe District, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China; Corresponding authors.Objectives: This meta-analysis was performed to compare polymyxin monotherapy and polymyxin-based combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) infections. Methods: We conducted searches on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Collaborative database for both observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing polymyxin monotherapy with polymyxin-based combination therapy in patients with CR-KP infection. The primary outcome was mortality. We divided all included studies into several groups according to different combination-combination and different infection types. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcome analysis. Results: Ten studies with 481 patients were included. Polymyxin monotherapy was associated with higher mortality than polymyxin-based combination therapy in treatment of CR-KP bloodstream infections (BSI) (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14–3.27, P = 0.01) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)/hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.15–12.71, P = 0.03). In subgroup analysis of different combinations, mortality was significantly higher with polymyxin monotherapy compared with combination therapy with tigecycline (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.05–3.37, P = 0.03), or with cabapenem (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.25–7.74, P = 0.01), but no differences were found in combinations with aminoglycosides (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72–2.29, P = 0.38). Three-drug combination therapy including polymyxin was also associated with significant survival benefit (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.60–9.32, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Polymyxin-based combination therapy provides significant survival benefit in treatment of CR-KP, which appears to be more pronounced when a carbapenem or tigecycline is included in the regimen.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716520302320PolymyxinMonotherapyCombination therapyCarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Si-Yuan Hou
Dan Wu
Xing-Huo Feng
spellingShingle Si-Yuan Hou
Dan Wu
Xing-Huo Feng
Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
Polymyxin
Monotherapy
Combination therapy
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
author_facet Si-Yuan Hou
Dan Wu
Xing-Huo Feng
author_sort Si-Yuan Hou
title Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort polymyxin monotherapy versus polymyxin-based combination therapy against carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
issn 2213-7165
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Objectives: This meta-analysis was performed to compare polymyxin monotherapy and polymyxin-based combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP) infections. Methods: We conducted searches on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Collaborative database for both observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing polymyxin monotherapy with polymyxin-based combination therapy in patients with CR-KP infection. The primary outcome was mortality. We divided all included studies into several groups according to different combination-combination and different infection types. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcome analysis. Results: Ten studies with 481 patients were included. Polymyxin monotherapy was associated with higher mortality than polymyxin-based combination therapy in treatment of CR-KP bloodstream infections (BSI) (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.14–3.27, P = 0.01) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)/hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.15–12.71, P = 0.03). In subgroup analysis of different combinations, mortality was significantly higher with polymyxin monotherapy compared with combination therapy with tigecycline (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.05–3.37, P = 0.03), or with cabapenem (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.25–7.74, P = 0.01), but no differences were found in combinations with aminoglycosides (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72–2.29, P = 0.38). Three-drug combination therapy including polymyxin was also associated with significant survival benefit (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.60–9.32, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Polymyxin-based combination therapy provides significant survival benefit in treatment of CR-KP, which appears to be more pronounced when a carbapenem or tigecycline is included in the regimen.
topic Polymyxin
Monotherapy
Combination therapy
Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213716520302320
work_keys_str_mv AT siyuanhou polymyxinmonotherapyversuspolymyxinbasedcombinationtherapyagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT danwu polymyxinmonotherapyversuspolymyxinbasedcombinationtherapyagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xinghuofeng polymyxinmonotherapyversuspolymyxinbasedcombinationtherapyagainstcarbapenemresistantklebsiellapneumoniaeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721432710937837568