Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?

A growing body of research points to the value of multiple group memberships for individual well-being. However, much of this work considers group memberships very broadly and in terms of number alone. We conducted two correlational studies exploring how the relationship between multiple group membe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anders L. Sønderlund, Thomas A. Morton, Michelle K. Ryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01038/full
id doaj-b1b693effd754191aeba7b8851212c01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1b693effd754191aeba7b8851212c012020-11-24T23:25:47ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782017-06-01810.3389/fpsyg.2017.01038239312Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?Anders L. Sønderlund0Anders L. Sønderlund1Thomas A. Morton2Michelle K. Ryan3Michelle K. Ryan4Social, Environmental and Organisational Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of ExeterExeter, United KingdomDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern DenmarkOdense, DenmarkSocial, Environmental and Organisational Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of ExeterExeter, United KingdomSocial, Environmental and Organisational Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of ExeterExeter, United KingdomDepartment of Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior, University of GroningenGroningen, NetherlandsA growing body of research points to the value of multiple group memberships for individual well-being. However, much of this work considers group memberships very broadly and in terms of number alone. We conducted two correlational studies exploring how the relationship between multiple group membership and well-being is shaped by (a) the complexity of those groups within the overall self-concept (i.e., social identity complexity: SIC), and (b) the perceived value and visibility of individual group memberships to others (i.e., stigma). Study 1 (N = 112) found a positive relationship between multiple group membership and well-being, but only for individuals high in SIC. This effect was mediated by perceived identity expression and access to social support. Study 2 (N = 104) also found that multiple group memberships indirectly contributed to well-being via perceived identity expression and social support, as well as identity compatibility and perceived social inclusion. But, in this study the relationship between multiple group memberships and well-being outcomes was moderated by the perceived value and visibility of group memberships to others. Specifically, possessing multiple, devalued and visible group memberships compromised well-being relative to multiple valued group memberships, or devalued group memberships that were invisible. Together, these studies suggest that the benefits of multiple group membership depend on factors beyond their number. Specifically, the features of group memberships, individually and in combination, and the way in which these guide self-expression and social action, determine whether these are a benefit or burden for individual well-being.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01038/fullsocial identity complexitystigma visibilityidentity compatibilitymultiple identitieswell-being
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anders L. Sønderlund
Anders L. Sønderlund
Thomas A. Morton
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan
spellingShingle Anders L. Sønderlund
Anders L. Sønderlund
Thomas A. Morton
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan
Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?
Frontiers in Psychology
social identity complexity
stigma visibility
identity compatibility
multiple identities
well-being
author_facet Anders L. Sønderlund
Anders L. Sønderlund
Thomas A. Morton
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan
author_sort Anders L. Sønderlund
title Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?
title_short Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?
title_full Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?
title_fullStr Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Group Membership and Well-Being: Is There Always Strength in Numbers?
title_sort multiple group membership and well-being: is there always strength in numbers?
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2017-06-01
description A growing body of research points to the value of multiple group memberships for individual well-being. However, much of this work considers group memberships very broadly and in terms of number alone. We conducted two correlational studies exploring how the relationship between multiple group membership and well-being is shaped by (a) the complexity of those groups within the overall self-concept (i.e., social identity complexity: SIC), and (b) the perceived value and visibility of individual group memberships to others (i.e., stigma). Study 1 (N = 112) found a positive relationship between multiple group membership and well-being, but only for individuals high in SIC. This effect was mediated by perceived identity expression and access to social support. Study 2 (N = 104) also found that multiple group memberships indirectly contributed to well-being via perceived identity expression and social support, as well as identity compatibility and perceived social inclusion. But, in this study the relationship between multiple group memberships and well-being outcomes was moderated by the perceived value and visibility of group memberships to others. Specifically, possessing multiple, devalued and visible group memberships compromised well-being relative to multiple valued group memberships, or devalued group memberships that were invisible. Together, these studies suggest that the benefits of multiple group membership depend on factors beyond their number. Specifically, the features of group memberships, individually and in combination, and the way in which these guide self-expression and social action, determine whether these are a benefit or burden for individual well-being.
topic social identity complexity
stigma visibility
identity compatibility
multiple identities
well-being
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01038/full
work_keys_str_mv AT anderslsønderlund multiplegroupmembershipandwellbeingistherealwaysstrengthinnumbers
AT anderslsønderlund multiplegroupmembershipandwellbeingistherealwaysstrengthinnumbers
AT thomasamorton multiplegroupmembershipandwellbeingistherealwaysstrengthinnumbers
AT michellekryan multiplegroupmembershipandwellbeingistherealwaysstrengthinnumbers
AT michellekryan multiplegroupmembershipandwellbeingistherealwaysstrengthinnumbers
_version_ 1725556010875092992