Biceps-Related Physical Findings Are Useful to Prevent Misdiagnosis of Cervical Spondylotic Amyotrophy as a Rotator Cuff Tear

Study DesignCase–control study.PurposeThe aim of the present study was to identify physical findings useful for differentiating between cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) and rotator cuff tears to prevent the misdiagnosis of CSA as a rotator cuff tear.Overview of LiteratureCSA and rotator cuff te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eiichiro Iwata, Hideki Shigematsu, Kazuya Inoue, Takuya Egawa, Masato Tanaka, Akinori Okuda, Yasuhiko Morimoto, Keisuke Masuda, Yusuke Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Munehisa Koizumi, Yasuhito Tanaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2018-02-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-12-69.pdf
Description
Summary:Study DesignCase–control study.PurposeThe aim of the present study was to identify physical findings useful for differentiating between cervical spondylotic amyotrophy (CSA) and rotator cuff tears to prevent the misdiagnosis of CSA as a rotator cuff tear.Overview of LiteratureCSA and rotator cuff tears are often confused among patients presenting with difficulty in shoulder elevation.MethodsTwenty-five patients with CSA and 27 with rotator cuff tears were enrolled. We included five physical findings specific to CSA that were observed in both CSA and rotator cuff tear patients. The findings were as follows: (1) weakness of the deltoid muscle, (2) weakness of the biceps muscle, (3) atrophy of the deltoid muscle, (4) atrophy of the biceps muscle, and (5) swallow-tail sign (assessment of the posterior fibers of the deltoid).ResultsAmong 25 CSA patients, 10 (40.0%) were misdiagnosed with a rotator cuff tear on initial diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity of each physical finding were as follows: (1) deltoid weakness (sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 55.6%), (2) biceps weakness (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 100%), (3) deltoid atrophy (sensitivity, 96.0%; specificity, 77.8%), (4) biceps atrophy (sensitivity, 88.8%; specificity, 92.6%), and (5) swallow-tail sign (sensitivity, 56.0%; specificity, 74.1%). There were statistically significant differences in each physical finding.ConclusionsCSA is likely to be misdiagnosed as a rotator cuff tear; however, weakness and atrophy of the biceps are useful findings for differentiating between CSA and rotator cuff tears to prevent misdiagnosis.
ISSN:1976-1902
1976-7846