Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis

Background<b>: </b>People with respiratory conditions are susceptible to health problems caused by exposure to indoor air pollutants. An economic framework was developed to inform a guideline developed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to estimate the required l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amy Dymond, Stuart Mealing, Jessica McMaster, Hayden Holmes, Lesley Owen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1679
id doaj-b1d2d970a6114333b9ff99929729ddbb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1d2d970a6114333b9ff99929729ddbb2021-02-10T00:06:35ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-02-01181679167910.3390/ijerph18041679Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic AnalysisAmy Dymond0Stuart Mealing1Jessica McMaster2Hayden Holmes3Lesley Owen4York Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NQ, UKYork Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NQ, UKYork Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NQ, UKYork Health Economics Consortium, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NQ, UKNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 10 Spring Gardens, London SW1A 2BU, UKBackground<b>: </b>People with respiratory conditions are susceptible to health problems caused by exposure to indoor air pollutants. An economic framework was developed to inform a guideline developed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to estimate the required level of efficacy necessary for an intervention to be cost-saving in dwellings across England. Methods: An economic modelling framework was built to estimate the incremental costs pre- and post-implementation of interventions designed to reduce exposure to indoor air pollution within dwellings of varying building-related risk factors and profiles. The intervention cost was varied simultaneously with the relative reduction in symptomatic cases of each health condition to estimate the point at which an intervention may become cost-saving. Four health conditions were considered. Results: People living in dwellings with either an extreme risk profile or usable floor area <90m<sup>2</sup> have the greatest capacity to benefit and save National Health Service (NHS) costs from interventions at any given level of effectiveness and upfront cost. Conclusions<b>:</b><b> </b>At any effectiveness level, the threshold for the upfront intervention cost to remain cost-saving is equivalent across the different home characteristics. The flexible model can be used to guide decision-making under a range of scenarios.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1679indoor air pollutionpublic health guidanceeconomic modelcost-effectiveness analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amy Dymond
Stuart Mealing
Jessica McMaster
Hayden Holmes
Lesley Owen
spellingShingle Amy Dymond
Stuart Mealing
Jessica McMaster
Hayden Holmes
Lesley Owen
Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
indoor air pollution
public health guidance
economic model
cost-effectiveness analysis
author_facet Amy Dymond
Stuart Mealing
Jessica McMaster
Hayden Holmes
Lesley Owen
author_sort Amy Dymond
title Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis
title_short Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis
title_full Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis
title_fullStr Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indoor Air Quality at Home—An Economic Analysis
title_sort indoor air quality at home—an economic analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Background<b>: </b>People with respiratory conditions are susceptible to health problems caused by exposure to indoor air pollutants. An economic framework was developed to inform a guideline developed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to estimate the required level of efficacy necessary for an intervention to be cost-saving in dwellings across England. Methods: An economic modelling framework was built to estimate the incremental costs pre- and post-implementation of interventions designed to reduce exposure to indoor air pollution within dwellings of varying building-related risk factors and profiles. The intervention cost was varied simultaneously with the relative reduction in symptomatic cases of each health condition to estimate the point at which an intervention may become cost-saving. Four health conditions were considered. Results: People living in dwellings with either an extreme risk profile or usable floor area <90m<sup>2</sup> have the greatest capacity to benefit and save National Health Service (NHS) costs from interventions at any given level of effectiveness and upfront cost. Conclusions<b>:</b><b> </b>At any effectiveness level, the threshold for the upfront intervention cost to remain cost-saving is equivalent across the different home characteristics. The flexible model can be used to guide decision-making under a range of scenarios.
topic indoor air pollution
public health guidance
economic model
cost-effectiveness analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1679
work_keys_str_mv AT amydymond indoorairqualityathomeaneconomicanalysis
AT stuartmealing indoorairqualityathomeaneconomicanalysis
AT jessicamcmaster indoorairqualityathomeaneconomicanalysis
AT haydenholmes indoorairqualityathomeaneconomicanalysis
AT lesleyowen indoorairqualityathomeaneconomicanalysis
_version_ 1724275768352047104