Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
The benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Prince Edward Island
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Island Studies Journal |
Subjects: |
id |
doaj-b1de6a3c4ce447cfa0d1b3a4b3e1c0e3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1de6a3c4ce447cfa0d1b3a4b3e1c0e32020-11-25T03:55:43ZengUniversity of Prince Edward IslandIsland Studies Journal1715-25931715-25932020-05-01151678810.24043/isj.112Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authoritiesCadey Korson0Sybille Poaouteta1Gerard Prinsen2Massey University, Aotearoa New ZealandIndependent researcher, New CaledoniaMassey University, Aotearoa New ZealandThe benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples indicated the international community’s formal recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights to political self-determination and govern their own affairs through their own decision-making institutions, and requires states to consult with these organisations to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Yet, few SNIJs with Indigenous peoples have established or restored Indigenous bodies of authority distinct from local governments. In the context of Islandian sovereignty and the unique power relationships organised between metropoles and islands, we consider how Indigenous authorities negotiate independence and dependence, statehood and non-sovereignty, autonomy and control. This article offers a foundational typology for thinking about these multilateral relations between metropoles, SNIJs, and customary or Indigenous authorities.governanceindigenous peoplesislandian sovereigntyislands |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cadey Korson Sybille Poaouteta Gerard Prinsen |
spellingShingle |
Cadey Korson Sybille Poaouteta Gerard Prinsen Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities Island Studies Journal governance indigenous peoples islandian sovereignty islands |
author_facet |
Cadey Korson Sybille Poaouteta Gerard Prinsen |
author_sort |
Cadey Korson |
title |
Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities |
title_short |
Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities |
title_full |
Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities |
title_fullStr |
Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities |
title_sort |
triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities |
publisher |
University of Prince Edward Island |
series |
Island Studies Journal |
issn |
1715-2593 1715-2593 |
publishDate |
2020-05-01 |
description |
The benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples indicated the international community’s formal recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights to political self-determination and govern their own affairs through their own decision-making institutions, and requires states to consult with these organisations to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Yet, few SNIJs with Indigenous peoples have established or restored Indigenous bodies of authority distinct from local governments. In the context of Islandian sovereignty and the unique power relationships organised between metropoles and islands, we consider how Indigenous authorities negotiate independence and dependence, statehood and non-sovereignty, autonomy and control. This article offers a foundational typology for thinking about these multilateral relations between metropoles, SNIJs, and customary or Indigenous authorities. |
topic |
governance indigenous peoples islandian sovereignty islands |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cadeykorson triangularnegotiationsofislandsovereigntyindigenousandcustomaryauthoritiesmetropolitanstateslocalmetropolitanauthorities AT sybillepoaouteta triangularnegotiationsofislandsovereigntyindigenousandcustomaryauthoritiesmetropolitanstateslocalmetropolitanauthorities AT gerardprinsen triangularnegotiationsofislandsovereigntyindigenousandcustomaryauthoritiesmetropolitanstateslocalmetropolitanauthorities |
_version_ |
1724468582539067392 |