Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities

The benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cadey Korson, Sybille Poaouteta, Gerard Prinsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Prince Edward Island 2020-05-01
Series:Island Studies Journal
Subjects:
id doaj-b1de6a3c4ce447cfa0d1b3a4b3e1c0e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1de6a3c4ce447cfa0d1b3a4b3e1c0e32020-11-25T03:55:43ZengUniversity of Prince Edward IslandIsland Studies Journal1715-25931715-25932020-05-01151678810.24043/isj.112Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authoritiesCadey Korson0Sybille Poaouteta1Gerard Prinsen2Massey University, Aotearoa New ZealandIndependent researcher, New CaledoniaMassey University, Aotearoa New ZealandThe benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples indicated the international community’s formal recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights to political self-determination and govern their own affairs through their own decision-making institutions, and requires states to consult with these organisations to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Yet, few SNIJs with Indigenous peoples have established or restored Indigenous bodies of authority distinct from local governments. In the context of Islandian sovereignty and the unique power relationships organised between metropoles and islands, we consider how Indigenous authorities negotiate independence and dependence, statehood and non-sovereignty, autonomy and control. This article offers a foundational typology for thinking about these multilateral relations between metropoles, SNIJs, and customary or Indigenous authorities.governanceindigenous peoplesislandian sovereigntyislands
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cadey Korson
Sybille Poaouteta
Gerard Prinsen
spellingShingle Cadey Korson
Sybille Poaouteta
Gerard Prinsen
Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
Island Studies Journal
governance
indigenous peoples
islandian sovereignty
islands
author_facet Cadey Korson
Sybille Poaouteta
Gerard Prinsen
author_sort Cadey Korson
title Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
title_short Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
title_full Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
title_fullStr Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
title_full_unstemmed Triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: Indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
title_sort triangular negotiations of island sovereignty: indigenous and customary authorities - metropolitan states - local metropolitan authorities
publisher University of Prince Edward Island
series Island Studies Journal
issn 1715-2593
1715-2593
publishDate 2020-05-01
description The benefits of subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) status are well detailed, but less attention has been given to the diffusion of economic, social and political benefits associated with these islands’ Islandian sovereignty among diverse island populations. The 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples indicated the international community’s formal recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights to political self-determination and govern their own affairs through their own decision-making institutions, and requires states to consult with these organisations to obtain free, prior and informed consent. Yet, few SNIJs with Indigenous peoples have established or restored Indigenous bodies of authority distinct from local governments. In the context of Islandian sovereignty and the unique power relationships organised between metropoles and islands, we consider how Indigenous authorities negotiate independence and dependence, statehood and non-sovereignty, autonomy and control. This article offers a foundational typology for thinking about these multilateral relations between metropoles, SNIJs, and customary or Indigenous authorities.
topic governance
indigenous peoples
islandian sovereignty
islands
work_keys_str_mv AT cadeykorson triangularnegotiationsofislandsovereigntyindigenousandcustomaryauthoritiesmetropolitanstateslocalmetropolitanauthorities
AT sybillepoaouteta triangularnegotiationsofislandsovereigntyindigenousandcustomaryauthoritiesmetropolitanstateslocalmetropolitanauthorities
AT gerardprinsen triangularnegotiationsofislandsovereigntyindigenousandcustomaryauthoritiesmetropolitanstateslocalmetropolitanauthorities
_version_ 1724468582539067392