Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
Introduction: Early Internal fixation of any fracture now days given us great advantage with relation to early mobilization and early returns to daily activity. Rate of infection related to implant surgery reported by numerous study ranges from 0.5% to 4-5% in closed fractures and up to 10% in cases...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jotr.in/article.asp?issn=0975-7341;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=29;epage=37;aulast=S. |
id |
doaj-b1f0fd86f2784f9498380f1c25b6fd42 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b1f0fd86f2784f9498380f1c25b6fd422020-11-25T03:58:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation0975-73412017-01-0191293710.4103/0975-7341.207164Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experienceS. P S. GillManish RajPulkesh SinghDinesh KumarJasveer SinghPrateek RastogiIntroduction: Early Internal fixation of any fracture now days given us great advantage with relation to early mobilization and early returns to daily activity. Rate of infection related to implant surgery reported by numerous study ranges from 0.5% to 4-5% in closed fractures and up to 10% in cases of compound fractures. Post operative infection with implant in place is one of the most difficult conditions to manage. In our study we tried to retain the implants in these cases and evaluated long term result in these cases. Material and Method: We selected total 108 cases of infected implant without union from regular follow cases of operated post operative cases of upper and lower limb long bones managed by nailing and plating 2006 to 2014. Out of 108 cases 94 cases completed their follow up duration. We managed these cases with retention of implant for as long as possible with regular debridement, incision and drainage, pus culture and sensitivity and antibiotics accordingly off and on till attainment of bony union. Final results were evaluated and any implant failure and other revision surgery rates recorded. Results: Out of 94 cases bony union were achieved in 76 cases (81%) with retention of same implant with proper antibiotic coverage, regular follow up and guarded weight bearing. 8 of our cases shows implant failure due to delayed and non union. In 10 cases, removal of implant was required before bony union. Infection related to implant was also cured once implant were removed after attaining bony union without any long term complications. Conclusion: This increase incidence of infection related to implant also aggravated by various drug resistant microorganism. In most of these cases of infected implant, implants can be retained in situ till bony union achieved. Low grade infection with implant didn't have any severe negative consequence on bony union. This infection can be cured with removal of implant once bony union achieved.http://www.jotr.in/article.asp?issn=0975-7341;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=29;epage=37;aulast=S.infected implantlong bone infected implantspostoperative infectionretention of infected implant |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. P S. Gill Manish Raj Pulkesh Singh Dinesh Kumar Jasveer Singh Prateek Rastogi |
spellingShingle |
S. P S. Gill Manish Raj Pulkesh Singh Dinesh Kumar Jasveer Singh Prateek Rastogi Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation infected implant long bone infected implants postoperative infection retention of infected implant |
author_facet |
S. P S. Gill Manish Raj Pulkesh Singh Dinesh Kumar Jasveer Singh Prateek Rastogi |
author_sort |
S. P S. Gill |
title |
Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience |
title_short |
Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience |
title_full |
Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience |
title_fullStr |
Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience |
title_full_unstemmed |
Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience |
title_sort |
infected nonunion with implant in situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation |
issn |
0975-7341 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: Early Internal fixation of any fracture now days given us great advantage with relation to early mobilization and early returns to daily activity. Rate of infection related to implant surgery reported by numerous study ranges from 0.5% to 4-5% in closed fractures and up to 10% in cases of compound fractures. Post operative infection with implant in place is one of the most difficult conditions to manage. In our study we tried to retain the implants in these cases and evaluated long term result in these cases. Material and Method: We selected total 108 cases of infected implant without union from regular follow cases of operated post operative cases of upper and lower limb long bones managed by nailing and plating 2006 to 2014. Out of 108 cases 94 cases completed their follow up duration. We managed these cases with retention of implant for as long as possible with regular debridement, incision and drainage, pus culture and sensitivity and antibiotics accordingly off and on till attainment of bony union. Final results were evaluated and any implant failure and other revision surgery rates recorded. Results: Out of 94 cases bony union were achieved in 76 cases (81%) with retention of same implant with proper antibiotic coverage, regular follow up and guarded weight bearing. 8 of our cases shows implant failure due to delayed and non union. In 10 cases, removal of implant was required before bony union. Infection related to implant was also cured once implant were removed after attaining bony union without any long term complications. Conclusion: This increase incidence of infection related to implant also aggravated by various drug resistant microorganism. In most of these cases of infected implant, implants can be retained in situ till bony union achieved. Low grade infection with implant didn't have any severe negative consequence on bony union. This infection can be cured with removal of implant once bony union achieved. |
topic |
infected implant long bone infected implants postoperative infection retention of infected implant |
url |
http://www.jotr.in/article.asp?issn=0975-7341;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=29;epage=37;aulast=S. |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT spsgill infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience AT manishraj infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience AT pulkeshsingh infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience AT dineshkumar infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience AT jasveersingh infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience AT prateekrastogi infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience |
_version_ |
1724458381017612288 |