Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience

Introduction: Early Internal fixation of any fracture now days given us great advantage with relation to early mobilization and early returns to daily activity. Rate of infection related to implant surgery reported by numerous study ranges from 0.5% to 4-5% in closed fractures and up to 10% in cases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. P S. Gill, Manish Raj, Pulkesh Singh, Dinesh Kumar, Jasveer Singh, Prateek Rastogi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jotr.in/article.asp?issn=0975-7341;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=29;epage=37;aulast=S.
id doaj-b1f0fd86f2784f9498380f1c25b6fd42
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1f0fd86f2784f9498380f1c25b6fd422020-11-25T03:58:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation0975-73412017-01-0191293710.4103/0975-7341.207164Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experienceS. P S. GillManish RajPulkesh SinghDinesh KumarJasveer SinghPrateek RastogiIntroduction: Early Internal fixation of any fracture now days given us great advantage with relation to early mobilization and early returns to daily activity. Rate of infection related to implant surgery reported by numerous study ranges from 0.5% to 4-5% in closed fractures and up to 10% in cases of compound fractures. Post operative infection with implant in place is one of the most difficult conditions to manage. In our study we tried to retain the implants in these cases and evaluated long term result in these cases. Material and Method: We selected total 108 cases of infected implant without union from regular follow cases of operated post operative cases of upper and lower limb long bones managed by nailing and plating 2006 to 2014. Out of 108 cases 94 cases completed their follow up duration. We managed these cases with retention of implant for as long as possible with regular debridement, incision and drainage, pus culture and sensitivity and antibiotics accordingly off and on till attainment of bony union. Final results were evaluated and any implant failure and other revision surgery rates recorded. Results: Out of 94 cases bony union were achieved in 76 cases (81%) with retention of same implant with proper antibiotic coverage, regular follow up and guarded weight bearing. 8 of our cases shows implant failure due to delayed and non union. In 10 cases, removal of implant was required before bony union. Infection related to implant was also cured once implant were removed after attaining bony union without any long term complications. Conclusion: This increase incidence of infection related to implant also aggravated by various drug resistant microorganism. In most of these cases of infected implant, implants can be retained in situ till bony union achieved. Low grade infection with implant didn't have any severe negative consequence on bony union. This infection can be cured with removal of implant once bony union achieved.http://www.jotr.in/article.asp?issn=0975-7341;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=29;epage=37;aulast=S.infected implantlong bone infected implantspostoperative infectionretention of infected implant
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. P S. Gill
Manish Raj
Pulkesh Singh
Dinesh Kumar
Jasveer Singh
Prateek Rastogi
spellingShingle S. P S. Gill
Manish Raj
Pulkesh Singh
Dinesh Kumar
Jasveer Singh
Prateek Rastogi
Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
infected implant
long bone infected implants
postoperative infection
retention of infected implant
author_facet S. P S. Gill
Manish Raj
Pulkesh Singh
Dinesh Kumar
Jasveer Singh
Prateek Rastogi
author_sort S. P S. Gill
title Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
title_short Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
title_full Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
title_fullStr Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
title_full_unstemmed Infected nonunion with implant In Situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
title_sort infected nonunion with implant in situ in long bone fractures, managed by retention of implant-our experience
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Rehabilitation
issn 0975-7341
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Introduction: Early Internal fixation of any fracture now days given us great advantage with relation to early mobilization and early returns to daily activity. Rate of infection related to implant surgery reported by numerous study ranges from 0.5% to 4-5% in closed fractures and up to 10% in cases of compound fractures. Post operative infection with implant in place is one of the most difficult conditions to manage. In our study we tried to retain the implants in these cases and evaluated long term result in these cases. Material and Method: We selected total 108 cases of infected implant without union from regular follow cases of operated post operative cases of upper and lower limb long bones managed by nailing and plating 2006 to 2014. Out of 108 cases 94 cases completed their follow up duration. We managed these cases with retention of implant for as long as possible with regular debridement, incision and drainage, pus culture and sensitivity and antibiotics accordingly off and on till attainment of bony union. Final results were evaluated and any implant failure and other revision surgery rates recorded. Results: Out of 94 cases bony union were achieved in 76 cases (81%) with retention of same implant with proper antibiotic coverage, regular follow up and guarded weight bearing. 8 of our cases shows implant failure due to delayed and non union. In 10 cases, removal of implant was required before bony union. Infection related to implant was also cured once implant were removed after attaining bony union without any long term complications. Conclusion: This increase incidence of infection related to implant also aggravated by various drug resistant microorganism. In most of these cases of infected implant, implants can be retained in situ till bony union achieved. Low grade infection with implant didn't have any severe negative consequence on bony union. This infection can be cured with removal of implant once bony union achieved.
topic infected implant
long bone infected implants
postoperative infection
retention of infected implant
url http://www.jotr.in/article.asp?issn=0975-7341;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=29;epage=37;aulast=S.
work_keys_str_mv AT spsgill infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience
AT manishraj infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience
AT pulkeshsingh infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience
AT dineshkumar infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience
AT jasveersingh infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience
AT prateekrastogi infectednonunionwithimplantinsituinlongbonefracturesmanagedbyretentionofimplantourexperience
_version_ 1724458381017612288