Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant

Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of urushiol against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) to that of NaOCl. Materials and Methods The canals of thirty two single rooted human teeth were instrumented with Ni-Ti files (ProTaper Next X1, X2, X3, Dentspl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sang-Wan Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2017-02-01
Series:Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.54
id doaj-b1ff4efe8e9f4b6a8bae5a867ee6f8d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b1ff4efe8e9f4b6a8bae5a867ee6f8d62020-11-25T00:30:35ZengKorean Academy of Conservative DentistryRestorative Dentistry & Endodontics2234-76582234-76662017-02-01421545910.5395/rde.2017.42.1.54 Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigantSang-Wan Kim0Dong-Hoon Shin1Dankook University College of DentistryDankook University College of DentistryObjectives The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of urushiol against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) to that of NaOCl. Materials and Methods The canals of thirty two single rooted human teeth were instrumented with Ni-Ti files (ProTaper Next X1, X2, X3, Dentsply). A pure culture of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was prepared in sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth. The teeth were submerged in the suspension of E. faecalis and were incubated at 37℃ for 7 days to allow biofilm formation. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups according to the irrigant used, and a negative control group where no irrigant was used (n = 8). Group 1 used physiologic normal saline, group 2 used 6% NaOCl, and group 3 used 10 wt% urushiol solution. After canal irrigation, each sample was collected by the sequential placement of 2 sterile paper points (ProTaper NEXT paper points, size X3, Dentsply). Ten-fold serial dilutions on each vials, and 100 µL were cultured on a BHI agar plate for 8 hours, and colony forming unit (CFU) analysis was done. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-whitney U tests. Results Saline group exhibited no difference in the CFU counts with control group, while NaOCl and urushiol groups showed significantly less CFU counts than saline and control groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions The result of this study suggests 10% urushiol and 6% NaOCl solution had powerful antibacterial activity against E. faecalis when they were used as root canal irrigants.https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.54
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sang-Wan Kim
Dong-Hoon Shin
spellingShingle Sang-Wan Kim
Dong-Hoon Shin
Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
author_facet Sang-Wan Kim
Dong-Hoon Shin
author_sort Sang-Wan Kim
title Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
title_short Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
title_full Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
title_fullStr Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial effect of urushiol on E. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
title_sort antibacterial effect of urushiol on e. faecalis as a root canal irrigant
publisher Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
series Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the antibacterial activity of urushiol against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) to that of NaOCl. Materials and Methods The canals of thirty two single rooted human teeth were instrumented with Ni-Ti files (ProTaper Next X1, X2, X3, Dentsply). A pure culture of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was prepared in sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth. The teeth were submerged in the suspension of E. faecalis and were incubated at 37℃ for 7 days to allow biofilm formation. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups according to the irrigant used, and a negative control group where no irrigant was used (n = 8). Group 1 used physiologic normal saline, group 2 used 6% NaOCl, and group 3 used 10 wt% urushiol solution. After canal irrigation, each sample was collected by the sequential placement of 2 sterile paper points (ProTaper NEXT paper points, size X3, Dentsply). Ten-fold serial dilutions on each vials, and 100 µL were cultured on a BHI agar plate for 8 hours, and colony forming unit (CFU) analysis was done. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-whitney U tests. Results Saline group exhibited no difference in the CFU counts with control group, while NaOCl and urushiol groups showed significantly less CFU counts than saline and control groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions The result of this study suggests 10% urushiol and 6% NaOCl solution had powerful antibacterial activity against E. faecalis when they were used as root canal irrigants.
url https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.1.54
work_keys_str_mv AT sangwankim antibacterialeffectofurushiolonefaecalisasarootcanalirrigant
AT donghoonshin antibacterialeffectofurushiolonefaecalisasarootcanalirrigant
_version_ 1725325961405136896