Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification

This article discusses three reasons for the typology of metacommunicative statements: the object of statements (the referent and reflexivity / non-reflexivity of the statements), a way of expressing metacommunicative intentions, and the pragmatic orientation of the statements, the article as well...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatyana Bobko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University 2015-10-01
Series:Respectus Philologicus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journals.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/13631
id doaj-b227eee6cfe1441c8d03398c770a4dfc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b227eee6cfe1441c8d03398c770a4dfc2020-11-24T21:12:38ZengVilnius University Respectus Philologicus1392-82952335-23882015-10-012833AMetacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for ClassificationTatyana Bobko0Minsk State Linguistic University, Belarus This article discusses three reasons for the typology of metacommunicative statements: the object of statements (the referent and reflexivity / non-reflexivity of the statements), a way of expressing metacommunicative intentions, and the pragmatic orientation of the statements, the article as well discusses the problems of classification, in particular, the difficulties of distinguishing metatext and metacommunicative comments. The analysis is performed on the basis of the popular Belarusian Internet resources. Three reasons for the typology of metacommunicative statements give the opportunity to construct their model, systematizing all the variety of real metacommunicative statements. Modelling structural and substantial characteristics of metacommunicative statements allows to identify those aspects of communication that are important or, on the contrary, unimportant in the eyes of a speaker, as well as the preferences of native speakers in the expression of metacommunicative intentions. http://www.journals.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/13631metalanguagemetatextmetacommunicationfolk linguistics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tatyana Bobko
spellingShingle Tatyana Bobko
Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification
Respectus Philologicus
metalanguage
metatext
metacommunication
folk linguistics
author_facet Tatyana Bobko
author_sort Tatyana Bobko
title Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification
title_short Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification
title_full Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification
title_fullStr Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification
title_full_unstemmed Metacommunicative Comments in the Internet Dialogue: Possible Grounds for Classification
title_sort metacommunicative comments in the internet dialogue: possible grounds for classification
publisher Vilnius University
series Respectus Philologicus
issn 1392-8295
2335-2388
publishDate 2015-10-01
description This article discusses three reasons for the typology of metacommunicative statements: the object of statements (the referent and reflexivity / non-reflexivity of the statements), a way of expressing metacommunicative intentions, and the pragmatic orientation of the statements, the article as well discusses the problems of classification, in particular, the difficulties of distinguishing metatext and metacommunicative comments. The analysis is performed on the basis of the popular Belarusian Internet resources. Three reasons for the typology of metacommunicative statements give the opportunity to construct their model, systematizing all the variety of real metacommunicative statements. Modelling structural and substantial characteristics of metacommunicative statements allows to identify those aspects of communication that are important or, on the contrary, unimportant in the eyes of a speaker, as well as the preferences of native speakers in the expression of metacommunicative intentions.
topic metalanguage
metatext
metacommunication
folk linguistics
url http://www.journals.vu.lt/respectus-philologicus/article/view/13631
work_keys_str_mv AT tatyanabobko metacommunicativecommentsintheinternetdialoguepossiblegroundsforclassification
_version_ 1716750362698842112