Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses

That social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stepan Vesely, Christian A. Klöckner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395/full
id doaj-b26a8974e6344fd798695fe6f8c40c4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b26a8974e6344fd798695fe6f8c40c4f2020-11-25T02:50:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-07-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395545057Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-AnalysesStepan VeselyChristian A. KlöcknerThat social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of environmentally relevant behaviors, intentions, and (broadly defined) attitudes, based on data from 29 previously published papers. The pooled correlations with social desirability are generally small, ranging from 0.06 to 0.11 (0.08–0.13 when correcting for measurement error attenuation). However, our results do not lead to the conclusion that social desirability can be completely disregarded by environmental psychologists as a potential confounder. For example, we found evidence of substantial heterogeneity across studies, so the effect of social desirability may be more pronounced in specific cases. Continued attention to social desirability bias is needed to fully understand its possible subtle effects.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395/fullsocial desirabilityproenvironmental behaviorsproenvironmental intentionsenvironmental attitudesmeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stepan Vesely
Christian A. Klöckner
spellingShingle Stepan Vesely
Christian A. Klöckner
Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
Frontiers in Psychology
social desirability
proenvironmental behaviors
proenvironmental intentions
environmental attitudes
meta-analysis
author_facet Stepan Vesely
Christian A. Klöckner
author_sort Stepan Vesely
title Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
title_short Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
title_full Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
title_fullStr Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
title_sort social desirability in environmental psychology research: three meta-analyses
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2020-07-01
description That social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of environmentally relevant behaviors, intentions, and (broadly defined) attitudes, based on data from 29 previously published papers. The pooled correlations with social desirability are generally small, ranging from 0.06 to 0.11 (0.08–0.13 when correcting for measurement error attenuation). However, our results do not lead to the conclusion that social desirability can be completely disregarded by environmental psychologists as a potential confounder. For example, we found evidence of substantial heterogeneity across studies, so the effect of social desirability may be more pronounced in specific cases. Continued attention to social desirability bias is needed to fully understand its possible subtle effects.
topic social desirability
proenvironmental behaviors
proenvironmental intentions
environmental attitudes
meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stepanvesely socialdesirabilityinenvironmentalpsychologyresearchthreemetaanalyses
AT christianaklockner socialdesirabilityinenvironmentalpsychologyresearchthreemetaanalyses
_version_ 1724739866356350976