Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses
That social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of e...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395/full |
id |
doaj-b26a8974e6344fd798695fe6f8c40c4f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b26a8974e6344fd798695fe6f8c40c4f2020-11-25T02:50:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-07-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395545057Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-AnalysesStepan VeselyChristian A. KlöcknerThat social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of environmentally relevant behaviors, intentions, and (broadly defined) attitudes, based on data from 29 previously published papers. The pooled correlations with social desirability are generally small, ranging from 0.06 to 0.11 (0.08–0.13 when correcting for measurement error attenuation). However, our results do not lead to the conclusion that social desirability can be completely disregarded by environmental psychologists as a potential confounder. For example, we found evidence of substantial heterogeneity across studies, so the effect of social desirability may be more pronounced in specific cases. Continued attention to social desirability bias is needed to fully understand its possible subtle effects.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395/fullsocial desirabilityproenvironmental behaviorsproenvironmental intentionsenvironmental attitudesmeta-analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stepan Vesely Christian A. Klöckner |
spellingShingle |
Stepan Vesely Christian A. Klöckner Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses Frontiers in Psychology social desirability proenvironmental behaviors proenvironmental intentions environmental attitudes meta-analysis |
author_facet |
Stepan Vesely Christian A. Klöckner |
author_sort |
Stepan Vesely |
title |
Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses |
title_short |
Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses |
title_full |
Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses |
title_fullStr |
Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses |
title_sort |
social desirability in environmental psychology research: three meta-analyses |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
That social desirability might be a confounder of people's survey responses regarding environmental actions has been discussed for a long time. To produce evidence for or against this assumption, we conducted meta-analyses of correlations between social desirability scales and self-reports of environmentally relevant behaviors, intentions, and (broadly defined) attitudes, based on data from 29 previously published papers. The pooled correlations with social desirability are generally small, ranging from 0.06 to 0.11 (0.08–0.13 when correcting for measurement error attenuation). However, our results do not lead to the conclusion that social desirability can be completely disregarded by environmental psychologists as a potential confounder. For example, we found evidence of substantial heterogeneity across studies, so the effect of social desirability may be more pronounced in specific cases. Continued attention to social desirability bias is needed to fully understand its possible subtle effects. |
topic |
social desirability proenvironmental behaviors proenvironmental intentions environmental attitudes meta-analysis |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01395/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stepanvesely socialdesirabilityinenvironmentalpsychologyresearchthreemetaanalyses AT christianaklockner socialdesirabilityinenvironmentalpsychologyresearchthreemetaanalyses |
_version_ |
1724739866356350976 |