Do rats learn conditional independence?

If acquired associations are to accurately represent real relevance relations, there is motivation for the hypothesis that learning will, in some circumstances, be more appropriately modelled, not as direct dependence, but as conditional independence. In a serial compound conditioning experiment, tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Ian Bowers, William Timberlake
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2017-01-01
Series:Royal Society Open Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160994
id doaj-b279b3b0d7b4497a807ca1ebd9b19f75
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b279b3b0d7b4497a807ca1ebd9b19f752020-11-25T04:05:19ZengThe Royal SocietyRoyal Society Open Science2054-57032017-01-014210.1098/rsos.160994160994Do rats learn conditional independence?Robert Ian BowersWilliam TimberlakeIf acquired associations are to accurately represent real relevance relations, there is motivation for the hypothesis that learning will, in some circumstances, be more appropriately modelled, not as direct dependence, but as conditional independence. In a serial compound conditioning experiment, two groups of rats were presented with a conditioned stimulus (CS1) that imperfectly (50%) predicted food, and was itself imperfectly predicted by a CS2. Groups differed in the proportion of CS2 presentations that were ultimately followed by food (25% versus 75%). Thus, the information presented regarding the relevance of CS2 to food was ambiguous between direct dependence and conditional independence (given CS1). If rats learnt that food was conditionally independent of CS2, given CS1, subjects of both groups should thereafter respond similarly to CS2 alone. Contrary to the conditionality hypothesis, subjects attended to the direct food predictability of CS2, suggesting that rats treat even distal stimuli in a CS sequence as immediately relevant to food, not conditional on an intermediate stimulus. These results urge caution in representing indirect associations as conditional associations, accentuate the theoretical weight of the Markov condition in graphical models, and challenge theories to articulate the conditions under which animals are expected to learn conditional associations, if ever.https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160994rattus norvegicusconditionalitycausal reasoningassociative learninggraphical modelsmarkov condition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Ian Bowers
William Timberlake
spellingShingle Robert Ian Bowers
William Timberlake
Do rats learn conditional independence?
Royal Society Open Science
rattus norvegicus
conditionality
causal reasoning
associative learning
graphical models
markov condition
author_facet Robert Ian Bowers
William Timberlake
author_sort Robert Ian Bowers
title Do rats learn conditional independence?
title_short Do rats learn conditional independence?
title_full Do rats learn conditional independence?
title_fullStr Do rats learn conditional independence?
title_full_unstemmed Do rats learn conditional independence?
title_sort do rats learn conditional independence?
publisher The Royal Society
series Royal Society Open Science
issn 2054-5703
publishDate 2017-01-01
description If acquired associations are to accurately represent real relevance relations, there is motivation for the hypothesis that learning will, in some circumstances, be more appropriately modelled, not as direct dependence, but as conditional independence. In a serial compound conditioning experiment, two groups of rats were presented with a conditioned stimulus (CS1) that imperfectly (50%) predicted food, and was itself imperfectly predicted by a CS2. Groups differed in the proportion of CS2 presentations that were ultimately followed by food (25% versus 75%). Thus, the information presented regarding the relevance of CS2 to food was ambiguous between direct dependence and conditional independence (given CS1). If rats learnt that food was conditionally independent of CS2, given CS1, subjects of both groups should thereafter respond similarly to CS2 alone. Contrary to the conditionality hypothesis, subjects attended to the direct food predictability of CS2, suggesting that rats treat even distal stimuli in a CS sequence as immediately relevant to food, not conditional on an intermediate stimulus. These results urge caution in representing indirect associations as conditional associations, accentuate the theoretical weight of the Markov condition in graphical models, and challenge theories to articulate the conditions under which animals are expected to learn conditional associations, if ever.
topic rattus norvegicus
conditionality
causal reasoning
associative learning
graphical models
markov condition
url https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.160994
work_keys_str_mv AT robertianbowers doratslearnconditionalindependence
AT williamtimberlake doratslearnconditionalindependence
_version_ 1724434674432868352