Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies

Seventy eight seedling progenies of a sweet tamarind type collected from Dindigul region were planted at HorticulturalCollege and Research Institute, Periyakulam during September 2005. These seedling progenies in pre bearing stagewere evaluated to assess the variability existing in respect of growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. Saraladevi, V. Ponnuswami, R.M. Vijayakumar and S.Chitra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indian Society of Plant Breeders 2010-07-01
Series:Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding
Subjects:
Online Access:http://sites.google.com/site/ejpb10/vol-1-4-3/Vol-1-4-542-547.pdf?attredirects=0
id doaj-b2893dfa82ea4a7596fa1b259e820806
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2893dfa82ea4a7596fa1b259e8208062020-11-24T21:33:42ZengIndian Society of Plant BreedersElectronic Journal of Plant Breeding0975-928X2010-07-0114542547Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling ProgeniesD. Saraladevi, V. Ponnuswami, R.M. Vijayakumar and S.ChitraSeventy eight seedling progenies of a sweet tamarind type collected from Dindigul region were planted at HorticulturalCollege and Research Institute, Periyakulam during September 2005. These seedling progenies in pre bearing stagewere evaluated to assess the variability existing in respect of growth parameters viz., tree height, girth and canopyspread. Among the three characters studied, canopy spread exhibited highest correlation with girth (0.61) than treeheight (0.21). Tree height having highest correlation with girth (0.46) than canopy spread (0.21). In Bivariate fitanalysis, TIS40, TIS 49 and TIS 52 were recorded the highest performance and TIS 53 had the lowest performanceamong the 78 progenies studied. In hierarchical clustering analysis, totally six groups were identified. In this, highestperformers TIS 26, TIS 38, TIS 40, TIS 49 and TIS 52 were came under one group and the lowest performers TIS5, TIS55, TIS 7, TIS 16, TIS69, TIS 72, TIS 24, TIS70, TIS 25, TIS 53, TIS 11, TIS 17, TIS 22, TIS 21 and TIS 46 wereclassified under the another group. Other four groups are moderately performing in nature. TIS 36 having dwarfstatured and compact canopy may be exploited for easy harvesting and it can also be possible to accommodate morenumber of trees within the specified area leading to high density planting.http://sites.google.com/site/ejpb10/vol-1-4-3/Vol-1-4-542-547.pdf?attredirects=0Sweet tamarinddiversitycluster analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Saraladevi, V. Ponnuswami, R.M. Vijayakumar and S.Chitra
spellingShingle D. Saraladevi, V. Ponnuswami, R.M. Vijayakumar and S.Chitra
Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies
Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding
Sweet tamarind
diversity
cluster analysis
author_facet D. Saraladevi, V. Ponnuswami, R.M. Vijayakumar and S.Chitra
author_sort D. Saraladevi, V. Ponnuswami, R.M. Vijayakumar and S.Chitra
title Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies
title_short Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies
title_full Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies
title_fullStr Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies
title_full_unstemmed Multivariate and Clustering Analysis in Sweet Tamarind Seedling Progenies
title_sort multivariate and clustering analysis in sweet tamarind seedling progenies
publisher Indian Society of Plant Breeders
series Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding
issn 0975-928X
publishDate 2010-07-01
description Seventy eight seedling progenies of a sweet tamarind type collected from Dindigul region were planted at HorticulturalCollege and Research Institute, Periyakulam during September 2005. These seedling progenies in pre bearing stagewere evaluated to assess the variability existing in respect of growth parameters viz., tree height, girth and canopyspread. Among the three characters studied, canopy spread exhibited highest correlation with girth (0.61) than treeheight (0.21). Tree height having highest correlation with girth (0.46) than canopy spread (0.21). In Bivariate fitanalysis, TIS40, TIS 49 and TIS 52 were recorded the highest performance and TIS 53 had the lowest performanceamong the 78 progenies studied. In hierarchical clustering analysis, totally six groups were identified. In this, highestperformers TIS 26, TIS 38, TIS 40, TIS 49 and TIS 52 were came under one group and the lowest performers TIS5, TIS55, TIS 7, TIS 16, TIS69, TIS 72, TIS 24, TIS70, TIS 25, TIS 53, TIS 11, TIS 17, TIS 22, TIS 21 and TIS 46 wereclassified under the another group. Other four groups are moderately performing in nature. TIS 36 having dwarfstatured and compact canopy may be exploited for easy harvesting and it can also be possible to accommodate morenumber of trees within the specified area leading to high density planting.
topic Sweet tamarind
diversity
cluster analysis
url http://sites.google.com/site/ejpb10/vol-1-4-3/Vol-1-4-542-547.pdf?attredirects=0
work_keys_str_mv AT dsaraladevivponnuswamirmvijayakumarandschitra multivariateandclusteringanalysisinsweettamarindseedlingprogenies
_version_ 1725952335033663488