Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex

Microstimulation in the somatosensory cortex can evoke artificial tactile percepts and can be incorporated into bidirectional brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to restore function after injury or disease. However, little is known about how stimulation parameters themselves affect perception. Here, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher L Hughes, Sharlene N Flesher, Jeffrey M Weiss, Michael Boninger, Jennifer L Collinger, Robert A Gaunt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2021-07-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/65128
id doaj-b292a2356f114af5b7f270e4b414ead8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b292a2356f114af5b7f270e4b414ead82021-08-19T14:07:58ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2021-07-011010.7554/eLife.65128Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortexChristopher L Hughes0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9257-8659Sharlene N Flesher1Jeffrey M Weiss2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1332-674XMichael Boninger3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6966-919XJennifer L Collinger4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-5395Robert A Gaunt5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-5818Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United StatesRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, United StatesRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United StatesRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Center of Excellence, Department of Veterans Affairs, Pittsburgh, United StatesRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Center of Excellence, Department of Veterans Affairs, Pittsburgh, United StatesRehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United StatesMicrostimulation in the somatosensory cortex can evoke artificial tactile percepts and can be incorporated into bidirectional brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to restore function after injury or disease. However, little is known about how stimulation parameters themselves affect perception. Here, we stimulated through microelectrode arrays implanted in the somatosensory cortex of two human participants with cervical spinal cord injury and varied the stimulus amplitude, frequency, and train duration. Increasing the amplitude and train duration increased the perceived intensity on all tested electrodes. Surprisingly, we found that increasing the frequency evoked more intense percepts on some electrodes but evoked less-intense percepts on other electrodes. These different frequency–intensity relationships were divided into three groups, which also evoked distinct percept qualities at different stimulus frequencies. Neighboring electrode sites were more likely to belong to the same group. These results support the idea that stimulation frequency directly controls tactile perception and that these different percepts may be related to the organization of somatosensory cortex, which will facilitate principled development of stimulation strategies for bidirectional BCIs.https://elifesciences.org/articles/65128intracortical microstimulationbrain-computer interfacessomatosensory cortexsensory feedback
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher L Hughes
Sharlene N Flesher
Jeffrey M Weiss
Michael Boninger
Jennifer L Collinger
Robert A Gaunt
spellingShingle Christopher L Hughes
Sharlene N Flesher
Jeffrey M Weiss
Michael Boninger
Jennifer L Collinger
Robert A Gaunt
Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
eLife
intracortical microstimulation
brain-computer interfaces
somatosensory cortex
sensory feedback
author_facet Christopher L Hughes
Sharlene N Flesher
Jeffrey M Weiss
Michael Boninger
Jennifer L Collinger
Robert A Gaunt
author_sort Christopher L Hughes
title Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
title_short Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
title_full Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
title_fullStr Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
title_full_unstemmed Perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
title_sort perception of microstimulation frequency in human somatosensory cortex
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
series eLife
issn 2050-084X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Microstimulation in the somatosensory cortex can evoke artificial tactile percepts and can be incorporated into bidirectional brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to restore function after injury or disease. However, little is known about how stimulation parameters themselves affect perception. Here, we stimulated through microelectrode arrays implanted in the somatosensory cortex of two human participants with cervical spinal cord injury and varied the stimulus amplitude, frequency, and train duration. Increasing the amplitude and train duration increased the perceived intensity on all tested electrodes. Surprisingly, we found that increasing the frequency evoked more intense percepts on some electrodes but evoked less-intense percepts on other electrodes. These different frequency–intensity relationships were divided into three groups, which also evoked distinct percept qualities at different stimulus frequencies. Neighboring electrode sites were more likely to belong to the same group. These results support the idea that stimulation frequency directly controls tactile perception and that these different percepts may be related to the organization of somatosensory cortex, which will facilitate principled development of stimulation strategies for bidirectional BCIs.
topic intracortical microstimulation
brain-computer interfaces
somatosensory cortex
sensory feedback
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/65128
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherlhughes perceptionofmicrostimulationfrequencyinhumansomatosensorycortex
AT sharlenenflesher perceptionofmicrostimulationfrequencyinhumansomatosensorycortex
AT jeffreymweiss perceptionofmicrostimulationfrequencyinhumansomatosensorycortex
AT michaelboninger perceptionofmicrostimulationfrequencyinhumansomatosensorycortex
AT jenniferlcollinger perceptionofmicrostimulationfrequencyinhumansomatosensorycortex
AT robertagaunt perceptionofmicrostimulationfrequencyinhumansomatosensorycortex
_version_ 1721202241305575424