Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Plantar pressures are commonly used as clinical measures, especially to determine optimum foot orthotic design. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) high plantar foot pressures have been linked to metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint radiological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowen Catherine J, Culliford David, Allen Ruth, Beacroft James, Gay Anita, Hooper Lindsey, Burridge Jane, Edwards Christopher J, Arden Nigel K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-11-01
Series:Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Online Access:http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/25
id doaj-b2a92b846bc04ad2b42bdbcb76b24c5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2a92b846bc04ad2b42bdbcb76b24c5c2020-11-24T21:53:00ZengBMCJournal of Foot and Ankle Research1757-11462011-11-01412510.1186/1757-1146-4-25Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve monthsBowen Catherine JCulliford DavidAllen RuthBeacroft JamesGay AnitaHooper LindseyBurridge JaneEdwards Christopher JArden Nigel K<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Plantar pressures are commonly used as clinical measures, especially to determine optimum foot orthotic design. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) high plantar foot pressures have been linked to metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint radiological erosion scores. However, the sensitivity of foot pressure measurement to soft tissue pathology within the foot is unknown. The aim of this study was to observe plantar foot pressures and forefoot soft tissue pathology in patients who have RA.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 114 patients with established RA (1987 ACR criteria) and 50 healthy volunteers were assessed at baseline. All RA participants returned for reassessment at twelve months. Interface foot-shoe plantar pressures were recorded using an F-Scan<sup>® </sup>system. The presence of forefoot soft tissue pathology was assessed using a DIASUS musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) system. Chi-square analyses and independent t-tests were used to determine statistical differences between baseline and twelve months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine interrelationships between soft tissue pathology and foot pressures.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At baseline, RA patients had a significantly higher peak foot pressures compared to healthy participants and peak pressures were located in the medial aspect of the forefoot in both groups. In contrast, RA participants had US detectable soft tissue pathology in the lateral aspect of the forefoot. Analysis of person specific data suggests that there are considerable variations over time with more than half the RA cohort having unstable presence of US detectable forefoot soft tissue pathology. Findings also indicated that, over time, changes in US detectable soft tissue pathology are out of phase with changes in foot-shoe interface pressures both temporally and spatially.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found that US detectable forefoot soft tissue pathology may be unrelated to peak forefoot pressures and suggest that patients with RA may biomechanically adapt to soft tissue forefoot pathology. In addition, we have observed that, in patients with RA, interface foot-shoe pressures and the presence of US detectable forefoot pathology may vary substantially over time. This has implications for clinical strategies that aim to offload peak plantar pressures.</p> http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/25
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bowen Catherine J
Culliford David
Allen Ruth
Beacroft James
Gay Anita
Hooper Lindsey
Burridge Jane
Edwards Christopher J
Arden Nigel K
spellingShingle Bowen Catherine J
Culliford David
Allen Ruth
Beacroft James
Gay Anita
Hooper Lindsey
Burridge Jane
Edwards Christopher J
Arden Nigel K
Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
author_facet Bowen Catherine J
Culliford David
Allen Ruth
Beacroft James
Gay Anita
Hooper Lindsey
Burridge Jane
Edwards Christopher J
Arden Nigel K
author_sort Bowen Catherine J
title Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
title_short Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
title_full Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
title_fullStr Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
title_full_unstemmed Forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
title_sort forefoot pathology in rheumatoid arthritis identified with ultrasound may not localise to areas of highest pressure: cohort observations at baseline and twelve months
publisher BMC
series Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
issn 1757-1146
publishDate 2011-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Plantar pressures are commonly used as clinical measures, especially to determine optimum foot orthotic design. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) high plantar foot pressures have been linked to metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint radiological erosion scores. However, the sensitivity of foot pressure measurement to soft tissue pathology within the foot is unknown. The aim of this study was to observe plantar foot pressures and forefoot soft tissue pathology in patients who have RA.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 114 patients with established RA (1987 ACR criteria) and 50 healthy volunteers were assessed at baseline. All RA participants returned for reassessment at twelve months. Interface foot-shoe plantar pressures were recorded using an F-Scan<sup>® </sup>system. The presence of forefoot soft tissue pathology was assessed using a DIASUS musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) system. Chi-square analyses and independent t-tests were used to determine statistical differences between baseline and twelve months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine interrelationships between soft tissue pathology and foot pressures.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>At baseline, RA patients had a significantly higher peak foot pressures compared to healthy participants and peak pressures were located in the medial aspect of the forefoot in both groups. In contrast, RA participants had US detectable soft tissue pathology in the lateral aspect of the forefoot. Analysis of person specific data suggests that there are considerable variations over time with more than half the RA cohort having unstable presence of US detectable forefoot soft tissue pathology. Findings also indicated that, over time, changes in US detectable soft tissue pathology are out of phase with changes in foot-shoe interface pressures both temporally and spatially.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found that US detectable forefoot soft tissue pathology may be unrelated to peak forefoot pressures and suggest that patients with RA may biomechanically adapt to soft tissue forefoot pathology. In addition, we have observed that, in patients with RA, interface foot-shoe pressures and the presence of US detectable forefoot pathology may vary substantially over time. This has implications for clinical strategies that aim to offload peak plantar pressures.</p>
url http://www.jfootankleres.com/content/4/1/25
work_keys_str_mv AT bowencatherinej forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT culliforddavid forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT allenruth forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT beacroftjames forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT gayanita forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT hooperlindsey forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT burridgejane forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT edwardschristopherj forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
AT ardennigelk forefootpathologyinrheumatoidarthritisidentifiedwithultrasoundmaynotlocalisetoareasofhighestpressurecohortobservationsatbaselineandtwelvemonths
_version_ 1725873509793529856