The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.

BACKGROUND: The use of biologic mesh to repair abdominal wall defects in contaminated surgical fields is becoming the standard of practice. However, failure rates and infections of these materials persist clinically. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanical properties of biologic me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles F Bellows, Benjamin M Wheatley, Krzysztof Moroz, Stephanie C Rosales, Lisa A Morici
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3116894?pdf=render
id doaj-b2acb1031077435d96a16fffa5b597d9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2acb1031077435d96a16fffa5b597d92020-11-25T01:24:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-01-0166e2122810.1371/journal.pone.0021228The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.Charles F BellowsBenjamin M WheatleyKrzysztof MorozStephanie C RosalesLisa A MoriciBACKGROUND: The use of biologic mesh to repair abdominal wall defects in contaminated surgical fields is becoming the standard of practice. However, failure rates and infections of these materials persist clinically. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanical properties of biologic mesh in response to a bacterial encounter. METHODS: A rat model of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection of subcutaneously implanted biologic mesh was used. Samples of biologic meshes (acellular human dermis (ADM) and porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS)) were inoculated with various concentrations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [10(5), 10(9) colony-forming units] or saline (control) prior to wound closure (n = 6 per group). After 10 or 20 days, meshes were explanted, and cultured for bacteria. Histological changes and bacterial recovery together with biomechanical properties were assessed. Data were compared using a 1-way ANOVA or a Mann-Whitney test, with p<0.05. RESULTS: The overall rate of staphylococcal mesh colonization was 81% and was comparable in the ADM and SIS groups. Initially (day 0) both biologic meshes had similar biomechanical properties. However after implantation, the SIS control material was significantly weaker than ADM at 20 days (p = 0.03), but their corresponding modulus of elasticity were similar at this time point (p>0.05). After inoculation with MRSA, a time, dose and material dependent decrease in the ultimate tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of SIS and ADM were noted compared to control values. CONCLUSION: The biomechanical properties of biologic mesh significantly decline after colonization with MRSA. Surgeons selecting a repair material should be aware of its biomechanical fate relative to other biologic materials when placed in a contaminated environment.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3116894?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charles F Bellows
Benjamin M Wheatley
Krzysztof Moroz
Stephanie C Rosales
Lisa A Morici
spellingShingle Charles F Bellows
Benjamin M Wheatley
Krzysztof Moroz
Stephanie C Rosales
Lisa A Morici
The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Charles F Bellows
Benjamin M Wheatley
Krzysztof Moroz
Stephanie C Rosales
Lisa A Morici
author_sort Charles F Bellows
title The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
title_short The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
title_full The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
title_fullStr The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
title_sort effect of bacterial infection on the biomechanical properties of biological mesh in a rat model.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2011-01-01
description BACKGROUND: The use of biologic mesh to repair abdominal wall defects in contaminated surgical fields is becoming the standard of practice. However, failure rates and infections of these materials persist clinically. The purpose of this study was to determine the mechanical properties of biologic mesh in response to a bacterial encounter. METHODS: A rat model of Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection of subcutaneously implanted biologic mesh was used. Samples of biologic meshes (acellular human dermis (ADM) and porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS)) were inoculated with various concentrations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [10(5), 10(9) colony-forming units] or saline (control) prior to wound closure (n = 6 per group). After 10 or 20 days, meshes were explanted, and cultured for bacteria. Histological changes and bacterial recovery together with biomechanical properties were assessed. Data were compared using a 1-way ANOVA or a Mann-Whitney test, with p<0.05. RESULTS: The overall rate of staphylococcal mesh colonization was 81% and was comparable in the ADM and SIS groups. Initially (day 0) both biologic meshes had similar biomechanical properties. However after implantation, the SIS control material was significantly weaker than ADM at 20 days (p = 0.03), but their corresponding modulus of elasticity were similar at this time point (p>0.05). After inoculation with MRSA, a time, dose and material dependent decrease in the ultimate tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of SIS and ADM were noted compared to control values. CONCLUSION: The biomechanical properties of biologic mesh significantly decline after colonization with MRSA. Surgeons selecting a repair material should be aware of its biomechanical fate relative to other biologic materials when placed in a contaminated environment.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3116894?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesfbellows theeffectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT benjaminmwheatley theeffectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT krzysztofmoroz theeffectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT stephaniecrosales theeffectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT lisaamorici theeffectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT charlesfbellows effectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT benjaminmwheatley effectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT krzysztofmoroz effectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT stephaniecrosales effectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
AT lisaamorici effectofbacterialinfectiononthebiomechanicalpropertiesofbiologicalmeshinaratmodel
_version_ 1725116580941004800