Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?

Unrestrained proliferation is a common feature of malignant neoplasms. Targeting the cell cycle is a therapeutic strategy to prevent unlimited cell division. Recently developed rationales for these selective inhibitors can be subdivided into two categories with antithetical functionality. One applie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kiyohiro Ando, Akira Nakagawara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Biomolecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/5/750
id doaj-b2e6b276ff284008a998b9bfd9c74b0f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2e6b276ff284008a998b9bfd9c74b0f2021-06-01T00:19:30ZengMDPI AGBiomolecules2218-273X2021-05-011175075010.3390/biom11050750Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?Kiyohiro Ando0Akira Nakagawara1Research Institute for Clinical Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, 818 Komuro, Ina, Saitama 362-0806, JapanSaga International Carbon Particle Beam Radiation Cancer Therapy Center, Saga HIMAT Foundation, 3049 Harakoga-Machi, Saga 841-0071, JapanUnrestrained proliferation is a common feature of malignant neoplasms. Targeting the cell cycle is a therapeutic strategy to prevent unlimited cell division. Recently developed rationales for these selective inhibitors can be subdivided into two categories with antithetical functionality. One applies a “brake” to the cell cycle to halt cell proliferation, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle kinases. The other “accelerates” the cell cycle to initiate replication/mitotic catastrophe, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. The fate of cell cycle progression or arrest is tightly regulated by the presence of tolerable or excessive DNA damage, respectively. This suggests that there is compatibility between inhibitors of DNA repair kinases, such as PARP inhibitors, and inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. In the present review, we explore alterations to the cell cycle that are concomitant with altered DNA damage repair machinery in unfavorable neuroblastomas, with respect to their unique genomic and molecular features. We highlight the vulnerabilities of these alterations that are attributable to the features of each. Based on the assessment, we offer possible therapeutic approaches for personalized medicine, which are seemingly antithetical, but both are promising strategies for targeting the altered cell cycle in unfavorable neuroblastomas.https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/5/750neuroblastomacell cycleMYCN11q losscheckpointDNA damage response
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kiyohiro Ando
Akira Nakagawara
spellingShingle Kiyohiro Ando
Akira Nakagawara
Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?
Biomolecules
neuroblastoma
cell cycle
MYCN
11q loss
checkpoint
DNA damage response
author_facet Kiyohiro Ando
Akira Nakagawara
author_sort Kiyohiro Ando
title Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?
title_short Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?
title_full Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?
title_fullStr Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?
title_full_unstemmed Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?
title_sort acceleration or brakes: which is rational for cell cycle-targeting neuroblastoma therapy?
publisher MDPI AG
series Biomolecules
issn 2218-273X
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Unrestrained proliferation is a common feature of malignant neoplasms. Targeting the cell cycle is a therapeutic strategy to prevent unlimited cell division. Recently developed rationales for these selective inhibitors can be subdivided into two categories with antithetical functionality. One applies a “brake” to the cell cycle to halt cell proliferation, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle kinases. The other “accelerates” the cell cycle to initiate replication/mitotic catastrophe, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. The fate of cell cycle progression or arrest is tightly regulated by the presence of tolerable or excessive DNA damage, respectively. This suggests that there is compatibility between inhibitors of DNA repair kinases, such as PARP inhibitors, and inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. In the present review, we explore alterations to the cell cycle that are concomitant with altered DNA damage repair machinery in unfavorable neuroblastomas, with respect to their unique genomic and molecular features. We highlight the vulnerabilities of these alterations that are attributable to the features of each. Based on the assessment, we offer possible therapeutic approaches for personalized medicine, which are seemingly antithetical, but both are promising strategies for targeting the altered cell cycle in unfavorable neuroblastomas.
topic neuroblastoma
cell cycle
MYCN
11q loss
checkpoint
DNA damage response
url https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/11/5/750
work_keys_str_mv AT kiyohiroando accelerationorbrakeswhichisrationalforcellcycletargetingneuroblastomatherapy
AT akiranakagawara accelerationorbrakeswhichisrationalforcellcycletargetingneuroblastomatherapy
_version_ 1721415257811845120