Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis

Purpose. Experimental data suggest that tumour cells can reversibly transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states (EMT and MET), a phenomenon known as cellular plasticity. The aim of this review was to appraise the clinical evidence for the role of cellular plasticity in prostate cancer (PC)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dima Y. Jadaan, Mutaz M. Jadaan, John P. McCabe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651580
id doaj-b2f510d89a474ae883f264a98a8b8d04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b2f510d89a474ae883f264a98a8b8d042020-11-24T21:24:41ZengHindawi LimitedProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2015-01-01201510.1155/2015/651580651580Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone MetastasisDima Y. Jadaan0Mutaz M. Jadaan1John P. McCabe2University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, IrelandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, IrelandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, IrelandPurpose. Experimental data suggest that tumour cells can reversibly transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states (EMT and MET), a phenomenon known as cellular plasticity. The aim of this review was to appraise the clinical evidence for the role of cellular plasticity in prostate cancer (PC) bone metastasis. Methods. An electronic search was performed using PubMed for studies that have examined the differential expression of epithelial, mesenchymal, and stem cell markers in human PC bone metastasis tissues. Results. The review included nineteen studies. More than 60% of the studies used ≤20 bone metastasis samples, and there were several sources of heterogeneity between studies. Overall, most stem cell markers analysed, except for CXCR4, were positively expressed in bone metastasis tissues, while the expression of EMT and MET markers was heterogeneous between and within samples. Several EMT and stemness markers that are involved in osteomimicry, such as Notch, Met receptor, and Wnt/β pathway, were highly expressed in bone metastases. Conclusions. Clinical findings support the role of cellular plasticity in PC bone metastasis and suggest that epithelial and mesenchymal states cannot be taken in isolation when targeting PC bone metastasis. The paper also highlights several challenges in the clinical detection of cellular plasticity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651580
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dima Y. Jadaan
Mutaz M. Jadaan
John P. McCabe
spellingShingle Dima Y. Jadaan
Mutaz M. Jadaan
John P. McCabe
Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
Prostate Cancer
author_facet Dima Y. Jadaan
Mutaz M. Jadaan
John P. McCabe
author_sort Dima Y. Jadaan
title Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
title_short Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
title_full Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
title_fullStr Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed Cellular Plasticity in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis
title_sort cellular plasticity in prostate cancer bone metastasis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Prostate Cancer
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Purpose. Experimental data suggest that tumour cells can reversibly transition between epithelial and mesenchymal states (EMT and MET), a phenomenon known as cellular plasticity. The aim of this review was to appraise the clinical evidence for the role of cellular plasticity in prostate cancer (PC) bone metastasis. Methods. An electronic search was performed using PubMed for studies that have examined the differential expression of epithelial, mesenchymal, and stem cell markers in human PC bone metastasis tissues. Results. The review included nineteen studies. More than 60% of the studies used ≤20 bone metastasis samples, and there were several sources of heterogeneity between studies. Overall, most stem cell markers analysed, except for CXCR4, were positively expressed in bone metastasis tissues, while the expression of EMT and MET markers was heterogeneous between and within samples. Several EMT and stemness markers that are involved in osteomimicry, such as Notch, Met receptor, and Wnt/β pathway, were highly expressed in bone metastases. Conclusions. Clinical findings support the role of cellular plasticity in PC bone metastasis and suggest that epithelial and mesenchymal states cannot be taken in isolation when targeting PC bone metastasis. The paper also highlights several challenges in the clinical detection of cellular plasticity.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/651580
work_keys_str_mv AT dimayjadaan cellularplasticityinprostatecancerbonemetastasis
AT mutazmjadaan cellularplasticityinprostatecancerbonemetastasis
AT johnpmccabe cellularplasticityinprostatecancerbonemetastasis
_version_ 1725986775862607872