Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina

Abstract Increases in impervious surfaces and land‐use changes associated with urbanization have long been the focus of urban hydrological research. However, studies and calculations that consider impervious surfaces alone do not encompass all factors that influence urban hydrologic response, as alt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Logan D. Ress, Chen‐Ling J. Hung, L. Allan James
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Flood Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12643
id doaj-b30949b8fde744999abbce0a250dc82d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b30949b8fde744999abbce0a250dc82d2020-11-25T03:14:49ZengWileyJournal of Flood Risk Management1753-318X2020-09-01133n/an/a10.1111/jfr3.12643Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South CarolinaLogan D. Ress0Chen‐Ling J. Hung1L. Allan James2South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Columbia South Carolina USADepartment of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Tamkang University New Taipei City 25137 TaiwanDepartment of Geography University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USAAbstract Increases in impervious surfaces and land‐use changes associated with urbanization have long been the focus of urban hydrological research. However, studies and calculations that consider impervious surfaces alone do not encompass all factors that influence urban hydrologic response, as alternative urban structures may have a substantial effect on stormflow. This study examines several descriptors to improve estimations of hydrologic impacts of urbanization in small watersheds. Configurations of drainage densities that include storm sewers were computed for the highly urbanized Rocky Branch Watershed. Storm sewer configurations resulted in an approximate tripling of the drainage density. In addition, rainfall and stormflow data were analyzed to compare the hydrologic response of two subcatchments with varying percentages of impervious areas and drainage densities. The subcatchment with a higher percentage of impervious area produced significantly (p < .01) higher runoff volumes with an average runoff coefficient of 0.446, while the subcatchment with higher storm sewer densities displayed significantly shorter lag times of 9 min. In this case, the percentage of impervious area increased the volume of runoff but, storm sewer densities accelerated hydrologic responses, suggesting that hydrologically relevant metrics should be considered to accurate assess flood risk alternatives.https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12643flood generationhydrologyrainfall runoffurban drainage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Logan D. Ress
Chen‐Ling J. Hung
L. Allan James
spellingShingle Logan D. Ress
Chen‐Ling J. Hung
L. Allan James
Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina
Journal of Flood Risk Management
flood generation
hydrology
rainfall runoff
urban drainage
author_facet Logan D. Ress
Chen‐Ling J. Hung
L. Allan James
author_sort Logan D. Ress
title Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina
title_short Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina
title_full Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina
title_fullStr Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: Rocky Branch Watershed, Columbia, South Carolina
title_sort impacts of urban drainage systems on stormwater hydrology: rocky branch watershed, columbia, south carolina
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Flood Risk Management
issn 1753-318X
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Increases in impervious surfaces and land‐use changes associated with urbanization have long been the focus of urban hydrological research. However, studies and calculations that consider impervious surfaces alone do not encompass all factors that influence urban hydrologic response, as alternative urban structures may have a substantial effect on stormflow. This study examines several descriptors to improve estimations of hydrologic impacts of urbanization in small watersheds. Configurations of drainage densities that include storm sewers were computed for the highly urbanized Rocky Branch Watershed. Storm sewer configurations resulted in an approximate tripling of the drainage density. In addition, rainfall and stormflow data were analyzed to compare the hydrologic response of two subcatchments with varying percentages of impervious areas and drainage densities. The subcatchment with a higher percentage of impervious area produced significantly (p < .01) higher runoff volumes with an average runoff coefficient of 0.446, while the subcatchment with higher storm sewer densities displayed significantly shorter lag times of 9 min. In this case, the percentage of impervious area increased the volume of runoff but, storm sewer densities accelerated hydrologic responses, suggesting that hydrologically relevant metrics should be considered to accurate assess flood risk alternatives.
topic flood generation
hydrology
rainfall runoff
urban drainage
url https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12643
work_keys_str_mv AT logandress impactsofurbandrainagesystemsonstormwaterhydrologyrockybranchwatershedcolumbiasouthcarolina
AT chenlingjhung impactsofurbandrainagesystemsonstormwaterhydrologyrockybranchwatershedcolumbiasouthcarolina
AT lallanjames impactsofurbandrainagesystemsonstormwaterhydrologyrockybranchwatershedcolumbiasouthcarolina
_version_ 1724642194791333888