Effect of Etching Procedures on the Adhesion of Biofilm-Coated Dentin

• Main Authors: Bo-Kyung Jeon, Chang-Ha Lee, A Reum Kim, Seung Hyun Han, Hyun-Jung Kim, Sibel A. Antonson, Sun-Young Kim
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
• Series: Materials
• Subjects: acid etching; biofilm; confocal laser scanning microscopy; micro-shear bond strength; <i>S. mutans</i>
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/12/2762

Oral biofilms coat all surfaces in the oral cavity including the exposed dentin surface. This study aimed to investigate biofilm removal by acid etching procedures and the effects of the residual biofilm on dentin surfaces on composite–dentin adhesion. Dentin discs were assigned to five groups: no biofilm formation (C); biofilm formation and no surface treatment (BF); biofilm formation and acid etching (BF-E); biofilm formation and acid etching followed by chlorhexidine soaking (BF-EC); and biofilm formation and rubbing with pumice, followed by acid etching (BF-RE). Biofilms were formed on saliva-precoated dentin discs by soaking the discs in <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> (<i>S. mutans</i>) suspension. Biofilm removal from the dentin surface was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively by confocal laser scanning microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. To compare the bond strength of the biofilm-coated dentin discs with the surface treatments, specimens were assigned to four groups: no biofilm formation and acid etching (C-E); BF-E; BF-EC; and BF-RE. Assessments of the micro-shear bond strength and subsequent failure modes were performed. BF-E and BF-EC did not remove the biofilm, whereas BF-RE partially removed the biofilm attached to the dentin (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The bond strength of BF-RE was significantly higher than those of BF-E and BF-EC, but lower than that of C-E (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, mechanical biofilm removal is recommended before etching procedures to enhance adhesion to the biofilm-coated dentin.