Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications
As a result of the development of the electronic environment, new actors appear in the scientific communication system, including repositories, mega-journals, and open peer review platforms, all of which operate in accordance with the open science paradigm. At the same time, the results of the work...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
National Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON)
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Наука и научная информация |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.neiconjournal.com/jour/article/view/88 |
id |
doaj-b3329e40e68f4728b475cf03e43e5278 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-b3329e40e68f4728b475cf03e43e52782021-07-28T13:19:24ZrusNational Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON)Наука и научная информация2658-31432020-11-0132-320721810.24108/2658-3143-2020-3-2-3-207-21847Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific PublicationsA. S. Gorbunova0I. I. Zassoursky1N. D. Trishchenko2Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityLomonosov Moscow State UniversityLomonosov Moscow State UniversityAs a result of the development of the electronic environment, new actors appear in the scientific communication system, including repositories, mega-journals, and open peer review platforms, all of which operate in accordance with the open science paradigm. At the same time, the results of the work of scientists are still being assessed by traditional databases and scientometric services based mostly on the citation counts, which is often irrelevant for the new projects due to non-compliance with formal criteria of such services. This article discusses the requirements of the Web of Science, Russian Science Citation Index, Scopus, and the Higher Attestation Commission (VAK) for the sources of scientific information, and analyzes 25 projects for compliance with these requirements. It was revealed that some of the new projects do not meet the criteria due to the lack of traditional markers of the scientific publication. Based on the results obtained, a number of recommendations were formulated that will allow to adjust the requirements to reflect the new realities.https://www.neiconjournal.com/jour/article/view/88scientometricsdatabasesmega journalsopen peer reviewrepositories |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
A. S. Gorbunova I. I. Zassoursky N. D. Trishchenko |
spellingShingle |
A. S. Gorbunova I. I. Zassoursky N. D. Trishchenko Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications Наука и научная информация scientometrics databases mega journals open peer review repositories |
author_facet |
A. S. Gorbunova I. I. Zassoursky N. D. Trishchenko |
author_sort |
A. S. Gorbunova |
title |
Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications |
title_short |
Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications |
title_full |
Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications |
title_fullStr |
Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Compliance of New Scientific Platforms with Formal Requirements for Scientific Publications |
title_sort |
compliance of new scientific platforms with formal requirements for scientific publications |
publisher |
National Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON) |
series |
Наука и научная информация |
issn |
2658-3143 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
As a result of the development of the electronic environment, new actors appear in the scientific communication system, including repositories, mega-journals, and open peer review platforms, all of which operate in accordance with the open science paradigm. At the same time, the results of the work of scientists are still being assessed by traditional databases and scientometric services based mostly on the citation counts, which is often irrelevant for the new projects due to non-compliance with formal criteria of such services. This article discusses the requirements of the Web of Science, Russian Science Citation Index, Scopus, and the Higher Attestation Commission (VAK) for the sources of scientific information, and analyzes 25 projects for compliance with these requirements. It was revealed that some of the new projects do not meet the criteria due to the lack of traditional markers of the scientific publication. Based on the results obtained, a number of recommendations were formulated that will allow to adjust the requirements to reflect the new realities. |
topic |
scientometrics databases mega journals open peer review repositories |
url |
https://www.neiconjournal.com/jour/article/view/88 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT asgorbunova complianceofnewscientificplatformswithformalrequirementsforscientificpublications AT iizassoursky complianceofnewscientificplatformswithformalrequirementsforscientificpublications AT ndtrishchenko complianceofnewscientificplatformswithformalrequirementsforscientificpublications |
_version_ |
1721275678529159168 |