In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size
<p>Sometime during the middle to late Holocene (8.2 <span class="inline-formula">ka</span> to <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 1850–1900 CE), the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) was smaller than its current configuration. Determining the exact dimens...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Climate of the Past |
Online Access: | https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/419/2021/cp-17-419-2021.pdf |
id |
doaj-b3d2a184b3204d7385753d3927eb9fdb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
N. E. Young A. J. Lesnek J. K. Cuzzone J. P. Briner J. A. Badgeley A. Balter-Kennedy B. L. Graham A. Cluett J. L. Lamp R. Schwartz T. Tuna E. Bard M. W. Caffee M. W. Caffee S. R. H. Zimmerman J. M. Schaefer |
spellingShingle |
N. E. Young A. J. Lesnek J. K. Cuzzone J. P. Briner J. A. Badgeley A. Balter-Kennedy B. L. Graham A. Cluett J. L. Lamp R. Schwartz T. Tuna E. Bard M. W. Caffee M. W. Caffee S. R. H. Zimmerman J. M. Schaefer In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size Climate of the Past |
author_facet |
N. E. Young A. J. Lesnek J. K. Cuzzone J. P. Briner J. A. Badgeley A. Balter-Kennedy B. L. Graham A. Cluett J. L. Lamp R. Schwartz T. Tuna E. Bard M. W. Caffee M. W. Caffee S. R. H. Zimmerman J. M. Schaefer |
author_sort |
N. E. Young |
title |
In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size |
title_short |
In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size |
title_full |
In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size |
title_fullStr |
In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size |
title_full_unstemmed |
In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet size |
title_sort |
in situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>be–<sup>14</sup>c–<sup>26</sup>al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in greenland ice sheet size |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Climate of the Past |
issn |
1814-9324 1814-9332 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
<p>Sometime during the middle to late Holocene (8.2 <span class="inline-formula">ka</span> to <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 1850–1900 CE), the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) was smaller than its current
configuration. Determining the exact dimensions of the Holocene ice-sheet
minimum and the duration that the ice margin rested inboard of its current
position remains challenging. Contemporary retreat of the GrIS from its
historical maximum extent in southwestern Greenland is exposing a landscape
that holds clues regarding the configuration and timing of past ice-sheet
minima. To quantify the duration of the time the GrIS margin was near its
modern extent we develop a new technique for Greenland that utilizes in situ
cosmogenic <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>26</sup>Al</span> in bedrock samples that have become
ice-free only in the last few decades due to the retreating ice-sheet margin at
Kangiata Nunaata Sermia (<span class="inline-formula"><i>n</i>=12</span> sites, 36 measurements; KNS), southwest Greenland. To maximize
the utility of this approach, we refine the deglaciation history of the region
with stand-alone <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span> measurements (<span class="inline-formula"><i>n</i>=49</span>) and traditional <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span> ages
from sedimentary deposits contained in proglacial–threshold lakes. We combine
our reconstructed ice-margin history in the KNS region with additional
geologic records from southwestern Greenland and recent model simulations of
GrIS change to constrain the timing of the GrIS minimum in southwest
Greenland and the magnitude of Holocene inland GrIS retreat, as well as to explore the
regional climate history influencing Holocene ice-sheet behavior. Our
<span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>26</sup>Al</span> measurements reveal that (1) KNS retreated behind
its modern margin just before 10 <span class="inline-formula">ka</span>, but it likely stabilized near the
present GrIS margin for several thousand years before retreating farther
inland, and (2) pre-Holocene <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span> detected in several of our sample sites
is most easily explained by several thousand years of surface exposure during
the last interglaciation. Moreover, our new results indicate that the minimum
extent of the GrIS likely occurred after <span class="inline-formula">∼5</span> <span class="inline-formula">ka</span>, and the GrIS
margin may have approached its eventual historical maximum extent as early as
<span class="inline-formula">∼2</span> <span class="inline-formula">ka</span>. Recent simulations of GrIS change are able to match the
geologic record of ice-sheet change in regions dominated by surface mass
balance, but they produce a poorer model–data fit in areas influenced by oceanic
and dynamic processes. Simulations that achieve<span id="page420"/> the best model–data fit
suggest that inland retreat of the ice margin driven by early to middle
Holocene warmth may have been mitigated by increased precipitation. Triple
<span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>26</sup>Al</span> measurements in recently deglaciated bedrock
provide a new tool to help decipher the duration of smaller-than-present ice
over multiple timescales. Modern retreat of the GrIS margin in southwest
Greenland is revealing a bedrock landscape that was also exposed during the
migration of the GrIS margin towards its Holocene minimum extent, but it has yet
to tap into a landscape that remained ice-covered throughout the entire
Holocene.</p> |
url |
https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/419/2021/cp-17-419-2021.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT neyoung insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT ajlesnek insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT jkcuzzone insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT jpbriner insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT jabadgeley insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT abalterkennedy insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT blgraham insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT acluett insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT jllamp insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT rschwartz insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT ttuna insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT ebard insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT mwcaffee insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT mwcaffee insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT srhzimmerman insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize AT jmschaefer insitucosmogenicsup10supbesup14supcsup26supalmeasurementsfromrecentlydeglaciatedbedrockasanewtooltodecipherchangesingreenlandicesheetsize |
_version_ |
1724265376197378048 |
spelling |
doaj-b3d2a184b3204d7385753d3927eb9fdb2021-02-17T08:50:38ZengCopernicus PublicationsClimate of the Past1814-93241814-93322021-02-011741945010.5194/cp-17-419-2021In situ cosmogenic <sup>10</sup>Be–<sup>14</sup>C–<sup>26</sup>Al measurements from recently deglaciated bedrock as a new tool to decipher changes in Greenland Ice Sheet sizeN. E. Young0A. J. Lesnek1J. K. Cuzzone2J. P. Briner3J. A. Badgeley4A. Balter-Kennedy5B. L. Graham6A. Cluett7J. L. Lamp8R. Schwartz9T. Tuna10E. Bard11M. W. Caffee12M. W. Caffee13S. R. H. Zimmerman14J. M. Schaefer15Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USADepartment of Earth Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USADepartment of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USADepartment of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USADepartment of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USALamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USADepartment of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USADepartment of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USALamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USALamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USACEREGE, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Collège de France, Technopôle de l'Arbois, Aix-en-Provence, FranceCEREGE, Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, Collège de France, Technopôle de l'Arbois, Aix-en-Provence, FranceDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, PRIME Lab, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USADepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USACenter for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USALamont–Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA<p>Sometime during the middle to late Holocene (8.2 <span class="inline-formula">ka</span> to <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 1850–1900 CE), the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) was smaller than its current configuration. Determining the exact dimensions of the Holocene ice-sheet minimum and the duration that the ice margin rested inboard of its current position remains challenging. Contemporary retreat of the GrIS from its historical maximum extent in southwestern Greenland is exposing a landscape that holds clues regarding the configuration and timing of past ice-sheet minima. To quantify the duration of the time the GrIS margin was near its modern extent we develop a new technique for Greenland that utilizes in situ cosmogenic <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>26</sup>Al</span> in bedrock samples that have become ice-free only in the last few decades due to the retreating ice-sheet margin at Kangiata Nunaata Sermia (<span class="inline-formula"><i>n</i>=12</span> sites, 36 measurements; KNS), southwest Greenland. To maximize the utility of this approach, we refine the deglaciation history of the region with stand-alone <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span> measurements (<span class="inline-formula"><i>n</i>=49</span>) and traditional <span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span> ages from sedimentary deposits contained in proglacial–threshold lakes. We combine our reconstructed ice-margin history in the KNS region with additional geologic records from southwestern Greenland and recent model simulations of GrIS change to constrain the timing of the GrIS minimum in southwest Greenland and the magnitude of Holocene inland GrIS retreat, as well as to explore the regional climate history influencing Holocene ice-sheet behavior. Our <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>26</sup>Al</span> measurements reveal that (1) KNS retreated behind its modern margin just before 10 <span class="inline-formula">ka</span>, but it likely stabilized near the present GrIS margin for several thousand years before retreating farther inland, and (2) pre-Holocene <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span> detected in several of our sample sites is most easily explained by several thousand years of surface exposure during the last interglaciation. Moreover, our new results indicate that the minimum extent of the GrIS likely occurred after <span class="inline-formula">∼5</span> <span class="inline-formula">ka</span>, and the GrIS margin may have approached its eventual historical maximum extent as early as <span class="inline-formula">∼2</span> <span class="inline-formula">ka</span>. Recent simulations of GrIS change are able to match the geologic record of ice-sheet change in regions dominated by surface mass balance, but they produce a poorer model–data fit in areas influenced by oceanic and dynamic processes. Simulations that achieve<span id="page420"/> the best model–data fit suggest that inland retreat of the ice margin driven by early to middle Holocene warmth may have been mitigated by increased precipitation. Triple <span class="inline-formula"><sup>10</sup>Be</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>14</sup>C</span>–<span class="inline-formula"><sup>26</sup>Al</span> measurements in recently deglaciated bedrock provide a new tool to help decipher the duration of smaller-than-present ice over multiple timescales. Modern retreat of the GrIS margin in southwest Greenland is revealing a bedrock landscape that was also exposed during the migration of the GrIS margin towards its Holocene minimum extent, but it has yet to tap into a landscape that remained ice-covered throughout the entire Holocene.</p>https://cp.copernicus.org/articles/17/419/2021/cp-17-419-2021.pdf |