Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem

Susceptibility tests by disk diffusion and by E-test and molecular typing by macrorestriction analysis were performed to determine the relatedness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from three distinct hospitals. The resistance profile of 124 isolates to 8 antimicrobial agents was determined in thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freitas Ana Lúcia Peixoto de, Barth Afonso Luis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2002-01-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702002000100001
id doaj-b3f6cd09696a4c61890ddd6a9ec665df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b3f6cd09696a4c61890ddd6a9ec665df2020-11-25T03:48:42ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases1413-86701678-43912002-01-01610106Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenemFreitas Ana Lúcia Peixoto deBarth Afonso LuisSusceptibility tests by disk diffusion and by E-test and molecular typing by macrorestriction analysis were performed to determine the relatedness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from three distinct hospitals. The resistance profile of 124 isolates to 8 antimicrobial agents was determined in three different hospitals, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Frequencies of susceptibility ranged from 43.9% for carbenicillin to 87.7% for ceftazidime. Cross-resistance data of imipenem-resistant isolates indicated that most (70%) were also resistant to carbenicillin, although 30% remained susceptible to ceftazidime and cefepime. In general, susceptibility profiles were not able to determine relatedness among isolates of P. aeruginosa. On the other hand, molecular typing by macrorestriction analysis demonstrated high discriminatory power and identified 66 strains among 72 isolates of P. aeruginosa. Imipenem-susceptible isolates were all different. However, identical clones of imipenem-resistant isolates were found in two of the hospitals, despite variable response to other antibiotics. No clustering of infection among the different medical centers was observed. In conclusion, clones of P. aeruginosa did not spread among the different hospitals in our city even though related isolates of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were found.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702002000100001Pseudomonas aeruginosaantibiotic resistanceimipenem
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Freitas Ana Lúcia Peixoto de
Barth Afonso Luis
spellingShingle Freitas Ana Lúcia Peixoto de
Barth Afonso Luis
Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
antibiotic resistance
imipenem
author_facet Freitas Ana Lúcia Peixoto de
Barth Afonso Luis
author_sort Freitas Ana Lúcia Peixoto de
title Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
title_short Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
title_full Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
title_fullStr Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
title_sort antibiotic resistance and molecular typing of pseudomonas aeruginosa: focus on imipenem
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1413-8670
1678-4391
publishDate 2002-01-01
description Susceptibility tests by disk diffusion and by E-test and molecular typing by macrorestriction analysis were performed to determine the relatedness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from three distinct hospitals. The resistance profile of 124 isolates to 8 antimicrobial agents was determined in three different hospitals, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Frequencies of susceptibility ranged from 43.9% for carbenicillin to 87.7% for ceftazidime. Cross-resistance data of imipenem-resistant isolates indicated that most (70%) were also resistant to carbenicillin, although 30% remained susceptible to ceftazidime and cefepime. In general, susceptibility profiles were not able to determine relatedness among isolates of P. aeruginosa. On the other hand, molecular typing by macrorestriction analysis demonstrated high discriminatory power and identified 66 strains among 72 isolates of P. aeruginosa. Imipenem-susceptible isolates were all different. However, identical clones of imipenem-resistant isolates were found in two of the hospitals, despite variable response to other antibiotics. No clustering of infection among the different medical centers was observed. In conclusion, clones of P. aeruginosa did not spread among the different hospitals in our city even though related isolates of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were found.
topic Pseudomonas aeruginosa
antibiotic resistance
imipenem
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-86702002000100001
work_keys_str_mv AT freitasanaluciapeixotode antibioticresistanceandmoleculartypingofpseudomonasaeruginosafocusonimipenem
AT barthafonsoluis antibioticresistanceandmoleculartypingofpseudomonasaeruginosafocusonimipenem
_version_ 1724497605093752832