Towards Better Concordance among Contextualized Evaluations in FAST-GDM Problems

• Main Authors: Marcelo Loor, Ana Tapia-Rosero, Guy De Tré
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
• Series: Mathematics
• Subjects: augmented intuitionistic fuzzy sets; contextualized evaluations; group decision-making; recurrent evaluations; consensus reaching process; computational intelligence
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/1/93

A flexible attribute-set group decision-making (FAST-GDM) problem consists in finding the most suitable option(s) out of the options under consideration, with a general agreement among a heterogeneous group of experts who can focus on different attributes to evaluate those options. An open challenge in FAST-GDM problems is to design consensus reaching processes (CRPs) by which the participants can perform evaluations with a high level of consensus. To address this challenge, a novel algorithm for reaching consensus is proposed in this paper. By means of the algorithm, called FAST-CR-XMIS, a participant can reconsider his/her evaluations after studying the most influential samples that have been shared by others through contextualized evaluations. Since exchanging those samples may make participants’ understandings more like each other, an increase of the level of consensus is expected. A simulation of a CRP where contextualized evaluations of newswire stories are characterized as augmented intuitionistic fuzzy sets (AIFS) shows how FAST-CR-XMIS can increase the level of consensus among the participants during the CRP.