Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls

'Purpose: 'Studies encompassing the views and aspirations of general practitioners (GPs) concerning the radiology report are rare. We present the results of a large-scale survey among GPs in Flanders, Belgium, and examine its implications for the communication between radiologists and GPs....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JML Bosmans, D Schrans, D Avonts, JM De Maeseneer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2014-11-01
Series:Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jbsr.be/articles/127
id doaj-b4676aa5039043cf91bd758167da3abf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4676aa5039043cf91bd758167da3abf2020-11-24T23:38:51ZengUbiquity PressJournal of the Belgian Society of Radiology2514-82812014-11-0197632533010.5334/jbr-btr.127127Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfallsJML Bosmans0D Schrans1D Avonts2JM De Maeseneer3Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, AntwerpDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium'Purpose: 'Studies encompassing the views and aspirations of general practitioners (GPs) concerning the radiology report are rare. We present the results of a large-scale survey among GPs in Flanders, Belgium, and examine its implications for the communication between radiologists and GPs. 'Materials and methods: 'GPs were invited by e-mail to participate in a survey on the radiology report. Respondents could state their degree of agreement with 46 statements. Besides that, they could freely make suggestions to improve the report. Quantitative results were examined to determine majority convictions. Free text suggestions were searched for motives and convictions. 'Results: 'Of 1323 GPs invited, 282 completed forms were prepared for analysis. 96.8% considered the report an indispensable tool. 85.5% were satisfied with it. Itemized reporting of complex examinations was favoured by a very large majority. 83 GPs (29.4%) made suggestions for improvement. Much emphasis was put upon the clinical role of the radiologist. The need to mark key images, to mention meaningful normal findings, to structure the report and to facilitate communication was also frequently mentioned. 'Conclusion: 'GPs expect the radiologist to think as a clinician and offer clinical answers. An automated electronic information chain may contribute to realize this objective but direct communication should always remain possible.https://www.jbsr.be/articles/127Radiology and radiologists
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author JML Bosmans
D Schrans
D Avonts
JM De Maeseneer
spellingShingle JML Bosmans
D Schrans
D Avonts
JM De Maeseneer
Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
Radiology and radiologists
author_facet JML Bosmans
D Schrans
D Avonts
JM De Maeseneer
author_sort JML Bosmans
title Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
title_short Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
title_full Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
title_fullStr Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
title_full_unstemmed Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
title_sort communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology
issn 2514-8281
publishDate 2014-11-01
description 'Purpose: 'Studies encompassing the views and aspirations of general practitioners (GPs) concerning the radiology report are rare. We present the results of a large-scale survey among GPs in Flanders, Belgium, and examine its implications for the communication between radiologists and GPs. 'Materials and methods: 'GPs were invited by e-mail to participate in a survey on the radiology report. Respondents could state their degree of agreement with 46 statements. Besides that, they could freely make suggestions to improve the report. Quantitative results were examined to determine majority convictions. Free text suggestions were searched for motives and convictions. 'Results: 'Of 1323 GPs invited, 282 completed forms were prepared for analysis. 96.8% considered the report an indispensable tool. 85.5% were satisfied with it. Itemized reporting of complex examinations was favoured by a very large majority. 83 GPs (29.4%) made suggestions for improvement. Much emphasis was put upon the clinical role of the radiologist. The need to mark key images, to mention meaningful normal findings, to structure the report and to facilitate communication was also frequently mentioned. 'Conclusion: 'GPs expect the radiologist to think as a clinician and offer clinical answers. An automated electronic information chain may contribute to realize this objective but direct communication should always remain possible.
topic Radiology and radiologists
url https://www.jbsr.be/articles/127
work_keys_str_mv AT jmlbosmans communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandradiologistsopinionsexperiencepromisespitfalls
AT dschrans communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandradiologistsopinionsexperiencepromisespitfalls
AT davonts communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandradiologistsopinionsexperiencepromisespitfalls
AT jmdemaeseneer communicationbetweengeneralpractitionersandradiologistsopinionsexperiencepromisespitfalls
_version_ 1725515604006273024