The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation

Abstract Background The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hadeel R. Bakhsh, Nilüfer Kablan, Walaa Alammar, Yaşar Tatar, Giorgio Ferriero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-04-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1
id doaj-b4a772adea6741c78831773886baf8fd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4a772adea6741c78831773886baf8fd2021-05-02T11:18:35ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252021-04-011911910.1186/s12955-021-01773-1The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputationHadeel R. Bakhsh0Nilüfer Kablan1Walaa Alammar2Yaşar Tatar3Giorgio Ferriero4Department of Rehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityDepartment of Rehabilitation, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityFaculty of Sports Sciences, Marmara ÜniversityPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Scientific Institute of Tradate, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCSAbstract Background The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users. Methods The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1. Results Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation. Conclusion This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users’ satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1Rasch analysisProsthesisPatient satisfactionPsychometricsRehabilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hadeel R. Bakhsh
Nilüfer Kablan
Walaa Alammar
Yaşar Tatar
Giorgio Ferriero
spellingShingle Hadeel R. Bakhsh
Nilüfer Kablan
Walaa Alammar
Yaşar Tatar
Giorgio Ferriero
The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Rasch analysis
Prosthesis
Patient satisfaction
Psychometrics
Rehabilitation
author_facet Hadeel R. Bakhsh
Nilüfer Kablan
Walaa Alammar
Yaşar Tatar
Giorgio Ferriero
author_sort Hadeel R. Bakhsh
title The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
title_short The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
title_full The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
title_fullStr The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
title_full_unstemmed The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
title_sort client satisfaction with device: a rasch validation of the arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation
publisher BMC
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
issn 1477-7525
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Background The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients’ satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users. Methods The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1. Results Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation. Conclusion This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users’ satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure.
topic Rasch analysis
Prosthesis
Patient satisfaction
Psychometrics
Rehabilitation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01773-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hadeelrbakhsh theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT niluferkablan theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT walaaalammar theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT yasartatar theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT giorgioferriero theclientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT hadeelrbakhsh clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT niluferkablan clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT walaaalammar clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT yasartatar clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
AT giorgioferriero clientsatisfactionwithdevicearaschvalidationofthearabicversioninpatientswithupperandlowerlimbamputation
_version_ 1721492437753397248