Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Second-line therapy is frequently utilized for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but there are limited data to guide this approach. While an assessment of overall survival based on registry data may not capture the impact of second- and third-line therapies on clinical outcome, this may be reflected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumanta Kumar Pal, Yulan Ingrid Lin, Bertram Yuh, Kara DeWalt, Austin Kazarian, Nicholas Vogelzang, Rebecca A Nelson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4550434?pdf=render
id doaj-b4bc891c132e4639bd4e086a23217980
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4bc891c132e4639bd4e086a232179802020-11-25T02:15:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01108e013662210.1371/journal.pone.0136622Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.Sumanta Kumar PalYulan Ingrid LinBertram YuhKara DeWaltAustin KazarianNicholas VogelzangRebecca A NelsonSecond-line therapy is frequently utilized for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but there are limited data to guide this approach. While an assessment of overall survival based on registry data may not capture the impact of second- and third-line therapies on clinical outcome, this may be reflected in relative conditional survival (RCS).Patients with stage IV urothelial carcinoma diagnosed from 1990-2010 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) dataset. The association of clinicopathologic variables with disease specific survival (DSS) was explored through univariate and multivariate analyses. DSS in subgroups divided by time period (1990-2000 v 2001-2010) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. One-year RCS at annual landmarks up to 5 years was compared in subgroups divided by time period.Of 261,987 patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma from 1990-2010, 3,110 patients met criteria for the current analysis. Characteristics of patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2000 (n = 810) and 2001 to 2010 (n = 2,300) were similar and there was no significant difference in DSS between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, older age (age ≥ 80) was associated with shorter DSS (HR 1.79, 95%CI 1.48-2.15), but no association was found between time period of diagnosis and outcome. One-year RCS improved substantially through successive annual landmarks up to 5 years, but no differences were seen in subgroups divided by time of diagnosis.No difference in RCS was observed amongst patients with stage IV urothelial carcinoma diagnosed from 1990-2000 and 2001-2010. A lack of difference in RCS (more so than cumulative DSS) may reflect a lack of progress in salvage therapies for the disease.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4550434?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumanta Kumar Pal
Yulan Ingrid Lin
Bertram Yuh
Kara DeWalt
Austin Kazarian
Nicholas Vogelzang
Rebecca A Nelson
spellingShingle Sumanta Kumar Pal
Yulan Ingrid Lin
Bertram Yuh
Kara DeWalt
Austin Kazarian
Nicholas Vogelzang
Rebecca A Nelson
Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Sumanta Kumar Pal
Yulan Ingrid Lin
Bertram Yuh
Kara DeWalt
Austin Kazarian
Nicholas Vogelzang
Rebecca A Nelson
author_sort Sumanta Kumar Pal
title Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
title_short Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
title_full Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
title_fullStr Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
title_full_unstemmed Conditional Survival in de novo Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.
title_sort conditional survival in de novo metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Second-line therapy is frequently utilized for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but there are limited data to guide this approach. While an assessment of overall survival based on registry data may not capture the impact of second- and third-line therapies on clinical outcome, this may be reflected in relative conditional survival (RCS).Patients with stage IV urothelial carcinoma diagnosed from 1990-2010 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) dataset. The association of clinicopathologic variables with disease specific survival (DSS) was explored through univariate and multivariate analyses. DSS in subgroups divided by time period (1990-2000 v 2001-2010) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. One-year RCS at annual landmarks up to 5 years was compared in subgroups divided by time period.Of 261,987 patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma from 1990-2010, 3,110 patients met criteria for the current analysis. Characteristics of patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2000 (n = 810) and 2001 to 2010 (n = 2,300) were similar and there was no significant difference in DSS between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, older age (age ≥ 80) was associated with shorter DSS (HR 1.79, 95%CI 1.48-2.15), but no association was found between time period of diagnosis and outcome. One-year RCS improved substantially through successive annual landmarks up to 5 years, but no differences were seen in subgroups divided by time of diagnosis.No difference in RCS was observed amongst patients with stage IV urothelial carcinoma diagnosed from 1990-2000 and 2001-2010. A lack of difference in RCS (more so than cumulative DSS) may reflect a lack of progress in salvage therapies for the disease.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4550434?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sumantakumarpal conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT yulaningridlin conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT bertramyuh conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT karadewalt conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT austinkazarian conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT nicholasvogelzang conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT rebeccaanelson conditionalsurvivalindenovometastaticurothelialcarcinoma
_version_ 1724896085231534080