Etiology of hearing loss in children.

Introduction and objective: The neonatal hearing loss is one of the most common disabilities, with lifelong implications for the child and his family. The implementation of the universal newborn hearing screening and the development in molecular medicine, genetic and integrative neuroscience has per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José Ignacio BENITO-OREJAS, Beatriz RAMÍREZ-CANO, Marleny CASASOLA-GIRÓN, Ana SÁNCHEZ-MARTÍNEZ, Viviana Andrea CIFUENTES-NAVAS, Darío MORAIS-PÉREZ
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca 2017-06-01
Series:Revista ORL
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/2444-7986/article/view/15088
Description
Summary:Introduction and objective: The neonatal hearing loss is one of the most common disabilities, with lifelong implications for the child and his family. The implementation of the universal newborn hearing screening and the development in molecular medicine, genetic and integrative neuroscience has perfected the early diagnosis of the hearing loss children and consequently its intervention. With this work, we want to clarify the audiological aspects and causes of the permanent hearing loss diagnosed during the past 20 years. Method: We reviewed retrospectively the records of the children diagnosed with less than 3 years of age of permanent hearing loss, during the period 1994-2015, in a tertiary center. Evaluate the time of home, laterality, type and degree of hearing loss. Depending on the background, genetic testing and other complementary explorations, we present the results of our diagnostic study. Results: In the study-population (n = 183), 71% of the permanent hearing loss > 30 dB HL was diagnosed at birth (congenital). Its main features are the bilaterality (81%), the predominance sensorineural (85%) and the grade profound (42%) or moderate (30%), more prevalent in the unilateral forms. About the etiologic diagnosis, a 47% of the cases are of origin genetic (29% of which are syndromic), a 25% of cause environmental and a 28% unknown. Discussion: Our results are consistent for the generally accepted distribution of causes, but there are discrepancies in the literature. Despite the different tests used, we had to infer the etiology in 62% of children with hearing loss, finally unknown by 28%. Conclusions: We consider fundamental the monitoring for a consensus standardized etiological protocol that orient in the diagnostic process of hearing loss in children.
ISSN:2444-7986