Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat

Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) aims to modulate attentional biases, but questions remain about its efficacy and there may be new variants yet to explore. The current study tested effects of a novel version of ABM, predictive ABM (predABM), using visually neutral cues predicting the locations of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas E. Gladwin, Martin Möbius, Eni S. Becker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2019-09-01
Series:Europe's Journal of Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1633
id doaj-b4d9ef7acd384b579583ef9c47fa9243
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b4d9ef7acd384b579583ef9c47fa92432020-11-25T02:57:35ZengPsychOpenEurope's Journal of Psychology1841-04132019-09-0115347949010.5964/ejop.v15i3.1633ejop.v15i3.1633Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for ThreatThomas E. Gladwin0Martin Möbius1Eni S. Becker2Institute of Education, Health and Social Sciences, University of Chichester, Chichester, United KingdomBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsAttentional Bias Modification (ABM) aims to modulate attentional biases, but questions remain about its efficacy and there may be new variants yet to explore. The current study tested effects of a novel version of ABM, predictive ABM (predABM), using visually neutral cues predicting the locations of future threatening and neutral stimuli that had a chance of appearing after a delay. Such effects could also help understand anticipatory attentional biases measured using cued Visual Probe Tasks. One hundred and two participants completed the experiment online. We tested whether training Towards Threat versus Away from Threat contingencies on the predABM would cause subsequent attentional biases towards versus away from threat versus neutral stimuli, respectively. Participants were randomly assigned and compared on attentional bias measured via a post-training Dot-Probe task. A significant difference was found between the attentional bias in the Towards Threat versus Away from Threat group. The training contingencies induced effects on bias in the expected direction, although the bias in each group separately did not reach significance. Stronger effects may require multiple training sessions. Nevertheless, the primary test confirmed the hypothesis, showing that the predABM is a potentially interesting variant of ABM. Theoretically, the results show that automatization may involve the process of selecting the outcome of a cognitive response, rather than a simple stimulus-response association. Training based on contingencies involving predicted stimuli affect subsequent attentional measures and could be of interest in future clinical studies.http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1633attentional bias modificationattentionthreatpredictive cuesattention bias
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas E. Gladwin
Martin Möbius
Eni S. Becker
spellingShingle Thomas E. Gladwin
Martin Möbius
Eni S. Becker
Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat
Europe's Journal of Psychology
attentional bias modification
attention
threat
predictive cues
attention bias
author_facet Thomas E. Gladwin
Martin Möbius
Eni S. Becker
author_sort Thomas E. Gladwin
title Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat
title_short Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat
title_full Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat
title_fullStr Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Attentional Bias Modification Induces Stimulus-Evoked Attentional Bias for Threat
title_sort predictive attentional bias modification induces stimulus-evoked attentional bias for threat
publisher PsychOpen
series Europe's Journal of Psychology
issn 1841-0413
publishDate 2019-09-01
description Attentional Bias Modification (ABM) aims to modulate attentional biases, but questions remain about its efficacy and there may be new variants yet to explore. The current study tested effects of a novel version of ABM, predictive ABM (predABM), using visually neutral cues predicting the locations of future threatening and neutral stimuli that had a chance of appearing after a delay. Such effects could also help understand anticipatory attentional biases measured using cued Visual Probe Tasks. One hundred and two participants completed the experiment online. We tested whether training Towards Threat versus Away from Threat contingencies on the predABM would cause subsequent attentional biases towards versus away from threat versus neutral stimuli, respectively. Participants were randomly assigned and compared on attentional bias measured via a post-training Dot-Probe task. A significant difference was found between the attentional bias in the Towards Threat versus Away from Threat group. The training contingencies induced effects on bias in the expected direction, although the bias in each group separately did not reach significance. Stronger effects may require multiple training sessions. Nevertheless, the primary test confirmed the hypothesis, showing that the predABM is a potentially interesting variant of ABM. Theoretically, the results show that automatization may involve the process of selecting the outcome of a cognitive response, rather than a simple stimulus-response association. Training based on contingencies involving predicted stimuli affect subsequent attentional measures and could be of interest in future clinical studies.
topic attentional bias modification
attention
threat
predictive cues
attention bias
url http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1633
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasegladwin predictiveattentionalbiasmodificationinducesstimulusevokedattentionalbiasforthreat
AT martinmobius predictiveattentionalbiasmodificationinducesstimulusevokedattentionalbiasforthreat
AT enisbecker predictiveattentionalbiasmodificationinducesstimulusevokedattentionalbiasforthreat
_version_ 1724710408863875072